Gemini 2.5 Flash Native Audio Dialog Thinking: Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis
Analysis of Google's Gemini 2.5 Flash Native Audio Dialog Thinking and comparison to other AI models across key metrics including quality, price, performance (tokens per second & time to first token), context window & more. Click on any model to compare API providers for that model. For more details including relating to our methodology, see our FAQs.
Comparison Summary
Intelligence:Price:Speed:Latency:Context Window:
Gemini 2.5 Flash Native Audio Dialog Thinking has a smaller context windows than average, with a context window of 32k tokens.
Highlights
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index; Higher is better
Speed
Output Tokens per Second; Higher is better
Price
USD per 1M Tokens; Lower is better
Parallel Queries:
Prompt Length:
Gemini 2.5 Flash Native Audio Dialog Thinking Model Details
Comparisons to Gemini 2.5 Flash Native Audio Dialog Thinking
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Native Audio Dialog Thinking
gpt-oss-20B (high)- GPT-4.1
- gpt-oss-120B (high)
- GPT-5 (minimal)
- GPT-5 (high)
Llama 4 Maverick- Gemini 2.5 Pro
- Gemini 2.5 Flash
Claude 4.1 Opus- Claude 4 Sonnet
Magistral Medium 1.2
DeepSeek R1 0528- DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
- DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Grok Code Fast 1- Grok 4
- Grok 4 Fast
Solar Pro 2
Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5
Kimi K2 0905
EXAONE 4.0 32B
GLM-4.5
Qwen3 235B 2507- DeepSeek V3.1
Further details
R1 1776
Nova Premier
Phi-4
LFM2 1.2B
MiniMax-Text-01
Granite 3.3 Instruct 8B
Reka Flash 3
Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 405B
Aya Expanse 32B
Jamba 1.7 Large
OpenChat 3.5 (1210)
DBRX Instruct
Llama 3.1 Tulu3 405B
Arctic Instruct
Yi-Large