Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24): Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis
Analysis of Google's Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24) and comparison to other AI models across key metrics including quality, price, performance (tokens per second & time to first token), context window & more. Click on any model to compare API providers for that model. For more details including relating to our methodology, see our FAQs.
Google has launched a newer model, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking exp. (Jan '25). We suggest considering this model instead of Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking exp. (Dec '24). See the following pages for a comparison of Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking exp. (Jan '25) to other models and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking exp. (Jan '25) API provider benchmarks.
Comparison Summary
Intelligence:
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking exp. (Dec '24) is of lower quality compared to average, with Intelligence Index across evaluations of 35.
Price:Speed:Latency:Context Window:Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking exp. (Dec '24) has a larger context windows than average, with a context window of 2.0M tokens.
Highlights
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index; Higher is better
Loading chart...
Speed
Output Tokens per Second; Higher is better
Loading chart...
Price
USD per 1M Tokens; Lower is better
Loading chart...
Parallel Queries:
Prompt Length:
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24) Model Details
Comparisons to Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking exp. (Dec '24)
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking exp. (Dec '24)
o4-mini (high)
GPT-4.1
o3
o3-pro
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Maverick
Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning)
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Claude 4 Opus Thinking
Claude 4 Sonnet Thinking
Magistral Small
DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)
DeepSeek V3 0324 (Mar '25)
Grok 4
Nova Premier
Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning)
MiniMax M1 80k
Kimi K2
Qwen3 235B (Reasoning)
GPT-4o (Nov '24)
Further details