Independent analysis of AI
Understand the AI landscape to choose the best model and provider for your use case
Optima
by Artificial Analysis
Build your own custom benchmark
Model Recommender
Get personalized model recommendations that optimize for your priorities across intelligence, speed, and cost
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0
GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium)GPT-6.1 Terra (High)GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh)GPT-6.1 Terra (Max)
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB (Reasoning)
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)See moreIntelligence, speed, and cost of leading language models, based on our independent evaluations
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task, by Model Release
Artificial Analysis Progress Index v1, Over Time
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index
Artificial Analysis Cyber Index
Artificial Analysis Decision Index
Capability Index Comparison
| Finance & Accounting | Strategy & Ops | Legal | Healthcare & Medical | Engineering | Economics | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) | 1 (59) | 1 (61) | 1 (58) | 1 (58) | 1 (65) | 1 (62) |
| GPT-6 Astra (Max) | 2 (57) | 3 (58) | 2 (56) | 3 (54) | 2 (62) | 3 (58) |
| GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) | 3 (56) | 7 (58) | 4 (54) | 4 (52) | 3 (59) | 4 (57) |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) | 4 (56) | 2 (58) | 5 (52) | 2 (54) | 4 (58) | 5 (56) |
| Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) | 6 (54) | 4 (58) | 3 (54) | 7 (51) | 5 (57) | 2 (59) |
| Muse Wonder Full (Max) | 5 (55) | 5 (58) | 6 (51) | 5 (52) | 6 (55) | 6 (56) |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 7 (53) | 6 (58) | 7 (49) | 6 (52) | 8 (50) | 7 (51) |
| Muse Wonder (Max) | 9 (51) | 9 (54) | 9 (47) | 8 (49) | 9 (49) | 8 (51) |
| GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) | 10 (49) | 10 (50) | 10 (46) | 10 (45) | 7 (54) | 9 (49) |
| Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | 8 (52) | 8 (55) | 8 (47) | 9 (47) | 11 (41) | 10 (48) |
| Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 11 (45) | 13 (47) | 12 (41) | 12 (41) | 12 (39) | 12 (44) |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | 14 (42) | 11 (49) | 14 (38) | 11 (41) | 15 (37) | 14 (40) |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | 13 (42) | 14 (47) | 11 (42) | 14 (38) | 13 (38) | 13 (41) |
| Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) | 12 (44) | 15 (39) | 13 (39) | 15 (37) | 10 (42) | 11 (44) |
| GLM-5.3 (Max) | 15 (42) | 12 (47) | 15 (36) | 13 (39) | 14 (38) | 15 (39) |
Evaluations
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Agentic SaaS workflows
Agentic scientific research workflows in a terminal
Agentic software engineering in open-source repositories
Reasoning & knowledge
Professional document reasoning, All-pass
Agentic coding & terminal use
Physics reasoning
Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents
Legal agentic work, Hallucination-Gated All-Pass Rate
Agentic business operations
Agentic real-world work tasks, Elo
Agentic interactive 3D experiences, Elo
Product and brand videos designed in code, Elo
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Medical long context reasoning
Visual reasoning
Rich, varied, well-crafted language
Well-structured, scannable, answer-first
Truthful, acknowledges uncertainty, non-sycophantic
Use of filler and generic language
More from Artificial Analysis
Search API
Benchmarks of web search APIs for agents, comparing retrieval quality, latency and price
Providers
Compare API providers on speed, latency, price and endpoint accuracy for each model
AA-3D
Measuring how well AI models build interactive 3D experiences, ranked by blind votes from our recruited panel
AA-Robotics
Measuring how well language models understand, plan and act in the physical world by controlling a robot arm
Quality and price of leading models for generating images from text prompts, ranked by Elo from blind human preference votes
Quality and price of leading models for editing images with text instructions, ranked by Elo from blind human preference votes
Video Voting
Vote between videos from leading models and shape the leaderboard
Video Leaderboard
Compare leading video models by quality and price, ranked by blind human preference votes
Quality and price of leading models for generating video with audio from text prompts, ranked by Elo from blind human preference votes
Quality and price of leading models for generating video with audio from images, ranked by Elo from blind human preference votes
Quality and price of leading models for editing videos with text instructions, ranked by Elo from blind human preference votes