Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision): Quality, Performance & Price Analysis
Analysis of Meta's Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) and comparison to other AI models across key metrics including quality, price, performance (tokens per second & time to first token), context window & more. Click on any model to compare API providers for that model. For more details including relating to our methodology, see our FAQs.
Comparison Summary
Quality:
Llama 3.2 90B (Vision) is of higher quality compared to average, with Quality Index across evaluations of 66.
Price:Llama 3.2 90B (Vision) is cheaper compared to average with a price of $0.90 per 1M Tokens (blended 3:1).
Llama 3.2 90B (Vision) Input token price: $0.90, Output token price: $0.90 per 1M Tokens.
Speed:Llama 3.2 90B (Vision) Input token price: $0.90, Output token price: $0.90 per 1M Tokens.
Llama 3.2 90B (Vision) is slower compared to average, with a output speed of 39.8 tokens per second.
Latency:Llama 3.2 90B (Vision) has a lower latency compared to average, taking 0.51s to receive the first token (TTFT).
Context Window:Llama 3.2 90B (Vision) has a smaller context windows than average, with a context window of 130k tokens.
Highlights
Quality
Artificial Analysis Quality Index; Higher is better
Speed
Output Tokens per Second; Higher is better
Price
USD per 1M Tokens; Lower is better
Parallel Queries:
Prompt Length:
Further details