Gemini 2.0 Flash (experimental): Quality, Performance & Price Analysis
Analysis of Google's Gemini 2.0 Flash (experimental) and comparison to other AI models across key metrics including quality, price, performance (tokens per second & time to first token), context window & more. Click on any model to compare API providers for that model. For more details including relating to our methodology, see our FAQs.
Comparison Summary
Quality:
Gemini 2.0 Flash (exp) is of higher quality compared to average, with Quality Index across evaluations of 82.
Price:Speed:Gemini 2.0 Flash (exp) is faster compared to average, with a output speed of 168.9 tokens per second.
Latency:Gemini 2.0 Flash (exp) has a lower latency compared to average, taking 0.53s to receive the first token (TTFT).
Context Window:Gemini 2.0 Flash (exp) has a larger context windows than average, with a context window of 2.0M tokens.
Highlights
Quality
Artificial Analysis Quality Index; Higher is better
Speed
Output Tokens per Second; Higher is better
Price
USD per 1M Tokens; Lower is better
Parallel Queries:
Prompt Length:
Further details