Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental (Feb '25): Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis
Analysis of Google's Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental (Feb '25) and comparison to other AI models across key metrics including quality, price, performance (tokens per second & time to first token), context window & more. Click on any model to compare API providers for that model. For more details including relating to our methodology, see our FAQs.
Comparison Summary
Intelligence:
Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental is of higher quality compared to average, with a MMLU score of 0.805 and a Intelligence Index across evaluations of 49.
Price:Speed:Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental is faster compared to average, with a output speed of 122.6 tokens per second.
Latency:Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental has a lower latency compared to average, taking 0.56s to receive the first token (TTFT).
Context Window:Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental has a larger context windows than average, with a context window of 2.0M tokens.
Highlights
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index; Higher is better
Speed
Output Tokens per Second; Higher is better
Price
USD per 1M Tokens; Lower is better
Parallel Queries:
Prompt Length:
Further details