Gemma 2 27B: Quality, Performance & Price Analysis
Analysis of Google's Gemma 2 27B and comparison to other AI models across key metrics including quality, price, performance (tokens per second & time to first token), context window & more. Click on any model to compare API providers for that model. For more details including relating to our methodology, see our FAQs.
Comparison Summary
Quality:
Gemma 2 27B is of higher quality compared to average, with a MMLU score of 0.752 and a Quality Index across evaluations of 61.
Price:Gemma 2 27B is cheaper compared to average with a price of $0.26 per 1M Tokens (blended 3:1).
Gemma 2 27B Input token price: $0.17, Output token price: $0.51 per 1M Tokens.
Speed:Gemma 2 27B Input token price: $0.17, Output token price: $0.51 per 1M Tokens.
Gemma 2 27B is slower compared to average, with a output speed of 49.3 tokens per second.
Latency:Gemma 2 27B has a lower latency compared to average, taking 0.52s to receive the first token (TTFT).
Context Window:Gemma 2 27B has a smaller context windows than average, with a context window of 8.2k tokens.
Highlights
Quality
Artificial Analysis Quality Index; Higher is better
Speed
Output Tokens per Second; Higher is better
Price
USD per 1M Tokens; Lower is better
Parallel Queries:
Prompt Length:
Note: Long prompts not supported as a context window of at least 10k tokens is required
Further details
o1-preview
Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct '24)
Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24)
Command-R+ (Aug '24)
Sonar 3.1 Large
Phi-3 Medium Instruct 14B
Solar Pro
DBRX Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B
Reka Flash (Sep '24)
Jamba 1.5 Large
DeepSeek-Coder-V2
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B
Yi-Large
OpenChat 3.5 (1210)