This model is deprecated. We only continue performance benchmarking for the default 10k input token workload. Results for other workloads are historical and no longer updated.

DeepSeek has launched a newer release, DeepSeek V3.1. We suggest considering it instead.

•

Open weights model

•

Released May 2025

DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) API Provider Benchmarking & Analysis

Model Comparison

This analysis is intended to support you in choosing the best API provider of DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) for your use-case.

Fastest

#1
Google VertexGoogle Vertex
153.1 t/s
#2
DeepInfraDeepInfra
24.6 t/s
#3
NovitaNovita
24.2 t/s

Output speed

Total 5 providers

Lowest Latency

#1
Google VertexGoogle Vertex
14.05 s
#2
DeepInfraDeepInfra
82.27 s
#3
NovitaNovita
83.98 s

Time to first answer token

Total 5 providers

Lowest Price

#1
DeepInfraDeepInfra
$0.56
#2
NovitaNovita
$0.64
#3
Google VertexGoogle Vertex
$1.76
#4
HyperbolicHyperbolic
$3.00
#5
Together AITogether AI
$3.40

Blended price (per 1M tokens)

Total 5 providers

DeepSeek R1 0528 is available through 5 API providers, each offering different performance characteristics and pricing. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across providers.

  • For output speed, the top providers are Google Vertex (153.1 t/s), DeepInfra (24.6 t/s), and Novita (24.2 t/s).
  • For latency, Google Vertex (14.05s), DeepInfra (82.27s), and Novita (83.98s) offer the lowest time to first answer token.
  • For pricing, DeepInfra (0.56), Novita (0.64), and Google Vertex (1.76) offer the lowest blended prices per 1M tokens. Prices vary up to 6.1x across providers.
  • Google Vertex offers the best performance with both the highest speed and lowest latency. For cost optimization, DeepInfra provides the most competitive pricing.
Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Seconds to first answer token received · Lower is better
USD per 1M tokens (blended) · Lower is better

Pricing

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Price (USD per M Tokens) · Lower is better · 10,000 input tokens

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type · Lower is better
No data available

Output Speed vs. Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · Output speed: output tokens per second · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Speed

Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)

Output Speed: DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)

Output speed: output tokens per second · 10,000 input tokens

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average decode time (minutes) per task; excludes TTFT and overhead time · Lower is better
No data available

Cost per Task vs. Time per Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Weighted average decode time (minutes) per Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
No data available

Latency

Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token

Time to First Answer Token

Seconds to first token received · Lower is better · 10,000 input tokens

Cache Behaviour

Cache Hit Rate

Share of cacheable input tokens served from cache · Median of the last four weeks, updated Sep 26, 2026

Cost per Task vs. Cache Hit Rate

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Cache hit rate: median of the last four weeks, updated Sep 26, 2026
Most attractive quadrant
No data available

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better · 10,000 input tokens

Key Comparison Metrics & API Features

Together AI logoTogether AI
164k
Open
--
--
--
--
--
Hyperbolic logoHyperbolic
164k
Open
--
--
--
--
--
Google logoGoogle
164k
Open
--
157
0.98
16.93
12.76
Novita logoNovita
164k
Open
--
23
1.25
109.63
86.70
DeepInfra logoDeepInfra
164k
Open
--
25
0.94
102.87
81.54

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) providers