Phi-4 Mini Instruct: Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis
Analysis of Microsoft Azure's Phi-4 Mini Instruct and comparison to other AI models across key metrics including quality, price, performance (tokens per second & time to first token), context window & more. Click on any model to compare API providers for that model. For more details including relating to our methodology, see our FAQs.
Comparison Summary
Intelligence:
Phi-4 Mini is of lower quality compared to average, with a MMLU score of 0.465 and a Intelligence Index across evaluations of 26.
Price:Speed:Phi-4 Mini is slower compared to average, with a output speed of 58.7 tokens per second.
Latency:Phi-4 Mini has a lower latency compared to average, taking 0.33s to receive the first token (TTFT).
Context Window:Phi-4 Mini has a smaller context windows than average, with a context window of 130k tokens.
Highlights
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index; Higher is better
Speed
Output Tokens per Second; Higher is better
Price
USD per 1M Tokens; Lower is better
Parallel Queries:
Prompt Length:
Phi-4 Mini Instruct Model Details
Comparisons to Phi-4 Mini
o3-pro
o3
GPT-4.1
o4-mini (high)
Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 4 Scout
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (Jun '25)
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (May '25) (Reasoning)
Claude 4 Sonnet (Extended Thinking)
Claude 4 Opus (Extended Thinking)
Claude 4 Sonnet
Mistral Medium 3
DeepSeek V3 0324 (Mar '25)
DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)
Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high)
Nova Premier
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning)
Qwen3 235B A22B (Reasoning)
GPT-4o (Nov '24)
Further details