Stay connected with us on X, Discord, and LinkedIn to stay up to date with future analysis

Anthropic has launched a newer model, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (June), we suggest considering this model instead.

For more information, see Comparison of Claude 3.5 Sonnet (June) to other models and API provider benchmarks for Claude 3.5 Sonnet (June).

Claude 3 Sonnet logo

Claude 3 Sonnet Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis

Proprietary model

Released March 2024

Model summary

Intelligence

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

10
1 out of 4 units for Intelligence.

Speed

Output tokens per second

N/A
Unknown out of 4 units for Speed.

Input Price

USD per 1M tokens

$3.00
3 out of 4 units for Input Price.

Output Price

USD per 1M tokens

$15.00
3 out of 4 units for Output Price.

Verbosity

Output tokens from Intelligence Index

1.0M
1 out of 4 units for Verbosity.

Metrics are compared against models of the same class:

  • Non-reasoning models → compared only with other non-reasoning models
  • Reasoning models → compared across both reasoning and non-reasoning
  • Open weights models → compared only with other open weights models of the same size class:
    • Tiny: ≤4B parameters
    • Small: 4B40B parameters
    • Medium: 40B150B parameters
    • Large: >150B parameters
  • Proprietary models → compared across proprietary and open weights models of the same price range, using a blended 3:1 input/output price ratio:
    • <$0.15 per 1M tokens
    • $0.15$1 per 1M tokens
    • >$1 per 1M tokens
Technical specifications
ReasoningNo

This page shows the non-reasoning version of this model.

A reasoning variant may also exist.

Input modality

Supports: image

This information is still being updated

Output modality

This information is still being updated

Knowledge cutoffAug 1, 2023
Context window200k
~300 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font

Claude 3 Sonnet is among the least intelligent models and somewhat expensive when comparing to other non-reasoning models of similar price. The model supports image input, and has a 200k tokens context window with knowledge up to August 2023.

Claude 3 Sonnet scores 10 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it at the lower end among comparable models (averaging 18). When evaluating the Intelligence Index, it generated 1.0M tokens, which is very concise in comparison to the average of 3.8M.

Pricing for Claude 3 Sonnet is $3.00 per 1M input tokens (somewhat expensive, average: $2.00) and $15.00 per 1M output tokens (somewhat expensive, average: $9.05). In total, it cost $19.31 to evaluate Claude 3 Sonnet on the Intelligence Index.

Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index; Higher is better
Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)
Speed
Output Tokens per Second; Higher is better
Price
USD per 1M Tokens; Lower is better

Intelligence

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.0 incorporates 10 evaluations: GDPval-AA, 𝜏²-Bench Telecom, Terminal-Bench Hard, SciCode, AA-LCR, AA-Omniscience, IFBench, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt
Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.0 includes: GDPval-AA, 𝜏²-Bench Telecom, Terminal-Bench Hard, SciCode, AA-LCR, AA-Omniscience, IFBench, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Dataset","name":"Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index","creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Artificial Analysis","url":"https://artificialanalysis.ai"},"description":"Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: Includes GDPval-AA, 𝜏²-Bench Telecom, Terminal-Bench Hard, SciCode, AA-LCR, AA-Omniscience, IFBench, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt evaluations spanning reasoning, knowledge, math & coding; Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis","measurementTechnique":"Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.","spatialCoverage":"Worldwide","keywords":["analytics","llm","AI","benchmark","model","gpt","claude"],"license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","isAccessibleForFree":true,"citation":"Artificial Analysis (2025). LLM benchmarks dataset. https://artificialanalysis.ai","data":""}

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.0 incorporates 10 evaluations: GDPval-AA, 𝜏²-Bench Telecom, Terminal-Bench Hard, SciCode, AA-LCR, AA-Omniscience, IFBench, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt
Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)
Proprietary
Open Weights

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.0 includes: GDPval-AA, 𝜏²-Bench Telecom, Terminal-Bench Hard, SciCode, AA-LCR, AA-Omniscience, IFBench, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Indicates whether the model weights are available. Models are labelled as 'Commercial Use Restricted' if the weights are available but commercial use is limited (typically requires obtaining a paid license).

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Dataset","name":"Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary","creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Artificial Analysis","url":"https://artificialanalysis.ai"},"description":"Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: Includes GDPval-AA, 𝜏²-Bench Telecom, Terminal-Bench Hard, SciCode, AA-LCR, AA-Omniscience, IFBench, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt evaluations spanning reasoning, knowledge, math & coding; Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis","measurementTechnique":"Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.","spatialCoverage":"Worldwide","keywords":["analytics","llm","AI","benchmark","model","gpt","claude"],"license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","isAccessibleForFree":true,"citation":"Artificial Analysis (2025). LLM benchmarks dataset. https://artificialanalysis.ai","data":""}

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis; Higher is better
Results claimed by AI Lab (not yet independently verified)
GDPval-AA (Agentic Real-World Work Tasks, (ELO-500)/2000)
Terminal-Bench Hard (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)
𝜏²-Bench Telecom (Agentic Tool Use)
AA-LCR (Long Context Reasoning)
AA-Omniscience Accuracy (Knowledge)
AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate (1 - Hallucination Rate)
Humanity's Last Exam (Reasoning & Knowledge)
GPQA Diamond (Scientific Reasoning)
SciCode (Coding)
IFBench (Instruction Following)
CritPt (Physics Reasoning)
MMMU Pro (Visual Reasoning)

While model intelligence generally translates across use cases, specific evaluations may be more relevant for certain use cases.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.0 includes: GDPval-AA, 𝜏²-Bench Telecom, Terminal-Bench Hard, SciCode, AA-LCR, AA-Omniscience, IFBench, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Results

Openness Index assesses model openness on a 0 to 100 normalized scale (higher is more open)

Intelligence Index Comparisons

Intelligence vs. Price

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index; Price: USD per 1M Tokens
Most attractive quadrant
Alibaba
Amazon
Anthropic
DeepSeek
Google
Kimi
OpenAI
xAI
Z AI

While higher intelligence models are typically more expensive, they do not all follow the same price-quality curve.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.0 includes: GDPval-AA, 𝜏²-Bench Telecom, Terminal-Bench Hard, SciCode, AA-LCR, AA-Omniscience, IFBench, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Price per token, represented as USD per million Tokens. Price is a blend of Input & Output token prices (3:1 ratio).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Intelligence Index Token Use & Cost

Output Tokens Used to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Tokens used to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Reasoning Tokens
Answer Tokens

The number of tokens required to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (excluding repeats).

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Input Cost
Reasoning Cost
Output Cost

The cost to run the evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, calculated using the model's input and output token pricing and the number of tokens used across evaluations (excluding repeats).

Context Window

Context Window

Context Window: Tokens Limit; Higher is better

Larger context windows are relevant to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) LLM workflows which typically involve reasoning and information retrieval of large amounts of data.

Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Dataset","name":"Context Window","creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Artificial Analysis","url":"https://artificialanalysis.ai"},"description":"Context window is the maximum number of tokens a model can accept in a single request. Higher limits allow longer prompts, documents, and more complex instructions.","measurementTechnique":"Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.","spatialCoverage":"Worldwide","keywords":["analytics","llm","AI","benchmark","model","gpt","claude"],"license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","isAccessibleForFree":true,"citation":"Artificial Analysis (2025). LLM benchmarks dataset. https://artificialanalysis.ai","data":""}

Pricing: Input and Output Prices

Price: USD per 1M Tokens
Input price
Output price

Price per token included in the request/message sent to the API, represented as USD per million Tokens.

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Intelligence vs. Price (Log Scale)

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index; Price: USD per 1M Tokens; Inspired by prior analysis by Swyx
Most attractive quadrant
Alibaba
Amazon
Anthropic
DeepSeek
Google
Kimi
OpenAI
xAI
Z AI

While higher intelligence models are typically more expensive, they do not all follow the same price-quality curve.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.0 includes: GDPval-AA, 𝜏²-Bench Telecom, Terminal-Bench Hard, SciCode, AA-LCR, AA-Omniscience, IFBench, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Price per token, represented as USD per million Tokens. Price is a blend of Input & Output token prices (3:1 ratio).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

 Pricing Comparison of Claude 3 Sonnet API Providers

Speed

Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)

Output Speed

Output Tokens per Second; Higher is better

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Dataset","name":"Output Speed","creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Artificial Analysis","url":"https://artificialanalysis.ai"},"description":"Output speed measures tokens generated per second after the first token is received. Higher values mean faster model output and higher throughput under comparable conditions.","measurementTechnique":"Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.","spatialCoverage":"Worldwide","keywords":["analytics","llm","AI","benchmark","model","gpt","claude"],"license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","isAccessibleForFree":true,"citation":"Artificial Analysis (2025). LLM benchmarks dataset. https://artificialanalysis.ai","data":""}

Output Speed vs. Price

Output Speed: Output Tokens per Second; Price: USD per 1M Tokens
Most attractive quadrant
Alibaba
Amazon
Anthropic
DeepSeek
Google
Kimi
OpenAI
xAI
Z AI

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Price per token, represented as USD per million Tokens. Price is a blend of Input & Output token prices (3:1 ratio).

Latency

Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token

Latency: Time To First Answer Token

Seconds to First Answer Token Received; Accounts for Reasoning Model 'Thinking' time
Input processing
Thinking (reasoning models, when applicable)

Time to first answer token received, in seconds, after API request sent. For reasoning models, this includes the 'thinking' time of the model before providing an answer. For models which do not support streaming, this represents time to receive the completion.

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 Tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to Output 500 Tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time; Lower is better
Input processing time
'Thinking' time (reasoning models)
Outputting time

Seconds to receive a 500 token response. Key components:

  • Input time: Time to receive the first response token
  • Thinking time (only for reasoning models): Time reasoning models spend outputting tokens to reason prior to providing an answer. Amount of tokens based on the average reasoning tokens across a diverse set of 60 prompts (methodology details).
  • Answer time: Time to generate 500 output tokens, based on output speed

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Model Size (Open Weights Models Only)

Model Size: Total and Active Parameters

Comparison between total model parameters and parameters active during inference
Active Parameters
Passive Parameters

The total number of trainable weights and biases in the model, expressed in billions. These parameters are learned during training and determine the model's ability to process and generate responses.

The number of parameters actually executed during each inference forward pass, expressed in billions. For Mixture of Experts (MoE) models, a routing mechanism selects a subset of experts per token, resulting in fewer active than total parameters. Dense models use all parameters, so active equals total.

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Sonnet

Claude 3 Sonnet was released on March 4, 2024.

Claude 3 Sonnet was created by Anthropic.

Claude 3 Sonnet scores 10 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it at the lower end among other non-reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 18).

Claude 3 Sonnet costs $3.00 per 1M input tokens (somewhat higher than average, median: $2.00) and $15.00 per 1M output tokens (somewhat higher than average, median: $9.05), based on the median across providers serving the model.

Claude 3 Sonnet costs $3.00 per 1M input tokens and $15.00 per 1M output tokens (based on the median across providers serving the model). For a blended rate (3:1 input to output ratio), this is $6.00 per 1M tokens. Pricing may vary by provider. Compare provider pricing

When evaluated on the Intelligence Index, Claude 3 Sonnet generated 1.0M output tokens, which is very competitive compared to other non-reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 3.8M).

No, Claude 3 Sonnet is not a reasoning model. It provides direct responses without extended chain-of-thought reasoning.

Claude 3 Sonnet supports image input.

Claude 3 Sonnet supports text only output.

Yes, Claude 3 Sonnet supports image input and can analyze, describe, and answer questions about images.

No, Claude 3 Sonnet is not multimodal. It only supports image input.

Claude 3 Sonnet has a context window of 200k tokens. This determines how much text and conversation history the model can process in a single request.

No, Claude 3 Sonnet is proprietary. The model weights are not publicly available.

Claude 3 Sonnet is a proprietary model and Anthropic has not disclosed the model size or parameter count.

Claude 3 Sonnet achieves a score of 10 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. This composite benchmark evaluates models across reasoning, knowledge, mathematics, and coding.

Claude 3 Sonnet has a knowledge cutoff of August 2023. The model's training data includes information up to this date.

Yes, Claude 3 Sonnet is available via API through 1 provider. Compare API providers

Claude 3 Sonnet is available through 1 API provider. Compare providers