Destaques

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better
Novo artigo publicado · 24 de ago.
Announcing the Speech Agent Arena: Compare Speech agents in real world conversations
Nova avaliação de modelo de linguagem · 24 de ago.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort)DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort)
Nova avaliação de modelo de linguagem · 24 de ago.
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
Nova avaliação de modelo de linguagem · 21 de ago.
Grok 4.6 (low)Grok 4.6 (low)
Nova avaliação de modelo de linguagem · 21 de ago.
Grok 4.6 (medium)Grok 4.6 (medium)
Nova avaliação de modelo de linguagem · 21 de ago.
Grok 4.6 (xhigh)Grok 4.6 (xhigh)
Nova avaliação de modelo de linguagem · 21 de ago.
Qwen3.8 27B (low)Qwen3.8 27B (low)
Nova avaliação de modelo de linguagem · 21 de ago.
Qwen3.8 27B (medium)Qwen3.8 27B (medium)
Nova avaliação de modelo de linguagem · 21 de ago.
LFM2.5-2.6BLFM2.5-2.6B
Metodologia atualizada · 20 de ago.
Artificial AnalysisCoding Agent Index methodology update (v1.4)
Novo recurso lançado · 19 de ago.
Artificial AnalysisAbout Us
Nova avaliação de modelo de linguagem · 19 de ago.
G9v3-39A5BG9v3-39A5B
Novo artigo publicado · 18 de ago.
Announcing the Artificial Analysis Search Index: Same Agent, Different Search
Nova avaliação de modelo de linguagem · 18 de ago.
GLM-5.3 (max)GLM-5.3 (max)
Nova avaliação de modelo de linguagem · 17 de ago.
Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)
Novo artigo publicado · 13 de ago.
Gemini 3.7 Flash: On the Intelligence vs. Time per Task Pareto frontier
Novo artigo publicado · 13 de ago.
Announcing Optima: create a custom benchmark for your use case
Nova avaliação de modelo de linguagem · 13 de ago.
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Nova avaliação de modelo de linguagem · 13 de ago.
Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium)Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium)
Nova avaliação de modelo de linguagem · 13 de ago.
Gemini 3.7 Flash (low)Gemini 3.7 Flash (low)Ver mais

Inteligência

Inteligência dos principais modelos de IA com base em nossas avaliações independentes

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Indicates whether the model weights are available. Models are labelled as 'Commercial Use Restricted' if commercial use is limited by conditions, and as 'Non-commercial' if the license prohibits commercial use.

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Inteligência dos modelos de linguagem de fronteira ao longo do tempo

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Desempenho, custo e tempo de execução dos principais agentes de programação em tarefas de engenharia de software de ponta a ponta

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index

Composite average pass@1 across DeepSWE, Terminal-Bench v2.1, and SWE-Atlas-QnA · Higher is better

Imagem e vídeo

Principais modelos dos rankings da Image Arena e da Video Arena, com intervalos de confiança de 95%

Ranking de texto para imagem

Pontuações Elo calculadas com base em votos cegos de preferência na Image Arena. Veja o ranking completo.

Fala

Principais modelos da Arena de Texto para Fala e das avaliações de fala para texto e fala para fala

Text to Speech Arena Leaderboard

Elo scores from blind preference votes in our Text to Speech Arena · See the full leaderboard here.

Relative Elo score of the models as determined by responses from users in Artificial Analysis' Speech Arena. Some models may not be shown due to not yet having enough votes.

Mede o desempenho dos modelos em capacidades e setores específicos

Artificial Analysis Agentic Index

Measures performance in agentic workflows, focusing on behaviors like tool use, planning, autonomy, and complex problem solving.
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better
See more

Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000

Agentic tool use

Agentic coding & terminal use

Coding

Reasoning & knowledge

Scientific reasoning

Physics reasoning

Knowledge

1 - hallucination rate

AA-LCRUpdated

Long context reasoning

Agentic knowledge work, Elo

Agentic SaaS workflows

Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate

Agentic business operations

Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents

Instruction following

Long-horizon agentic tasks

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

Visual reasoning

Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

While model intelligence generally translates across use cases, specific evaluations may be more relevant for certain use cases.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

AA-Briefcase

O AA-Briefcase é uma avaliação agentiva avançada voltada para tarefas de conhecimento de longo prazo. Ela testa agentes em fluxos de trabalho empresariais realistas, que exigem a produção de entregáveis como planilhas, apresentações e memorandos.

AA-Briefcase Elo

AA-Briefcase is an agentic knowledge work benchmark developed by Artificial Analysis. AA-Briefcase Elo is a combined metric that aggregates rubric pass rate, analytical quality Elo and presentation Elo · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

AA-Briefcase Elo is a combined metric that aggregates analytical quality Elo, presentation Elo, and rubric pass rate, with rubric performance converted into Elo via synthetic head-to-head matches. Elo and 95% confidence interval bounds are clamped at 0.

AA-AnalystAgent

O AA-AnalystAgent é um benchmark de análise quantitativa de ponta a ponta sobre planilhas e documentos reais — o tipo de trabalho que analistas de negócios e de dados fazem todos os dias.

AA-AnalystAgent pass^5

Share of end-to-end quantitative analysis tasks solved on all five attempts · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Share of AA-AnalystAgent questions answered correctly on all five attempts. AA-AnalystAgent is Artificial Analysis' benchmark for end-to-end quantitative analysis on real-world spreadsheets and documents; every question is run five independent times, so pass^5 measures how reliably a model reproduces a correct answer rather than how often it reaches one.

AA-Omniscience

O AA-Omniscience é um benchmark de conhecimento e alucinações que recompensa a acurácia, penaliza palpites errados e oferece uma visão abrangente de quais modelos produzem resultados factualmente confiáveis em diferentes áreas

AA-Omniscience Index

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.

GDPval-AA v2

O GDPval-AA v2 avalia modelos de IA em tarefas reais e economicamente relevantes de uma ampla variedade de profissões

GDPval-AA v2 Leaderboard

Elo rating for performance on real-world work tasks · Anchored to a human baseline of 1,000 · Higher is better
Human Baseline (1,000)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

O Artificial Analysis Openness Index avalia quanto os modelos são 'abertos' com base em sua disponibilidade e na transparência de diferentes componentes.

Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Components

Openness Index underlying score contribution by components, up to a maximum of 18 (higher is more open)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Openness Index vs. Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Tokens de saída

Tokens de saída dos principais modelos de IA com base em nossas avaliações independentes

Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average number of output tokens used to run one task in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

The number of tokens required per Intelligence Index task. This is calculated by multiplying the output tokens per eval by the relative weights of each benchmark in the Intelligence Index, then dividing by task count (excluding repeats).

Custo

Preços e custos reais dos principais modelos de IA com base em nossas avaliações independentes

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

The cost to run the evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, calculated using the model's input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices and the number of tokens used across evaluations (excluding repeats).

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Price (USD per M Tokens)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Price per token for cached prompts (previously processed), typically offering a significant discount compared to regular input price, represented as USD per million tokens. The values shown here are the cache hit price; cache write and cache storage are billed separately and vary by provider — see "Cache pricing by provider" for detail.

Velocidade e latência

Comparação do desempenho das APIs oficiais

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average decode time (minutes) per task; excludes TTFT and overhead time · Lower is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

The weighted average time (seconds) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task. This is calculated by dividing output tokens per task by output speed, weighted by the relative weights of each benchmark in the Intelligence Index.

Provedores

Endpoint Accuracy Index: gpt-oss-120b (high)

v1.0 · Composite of BFCL v4-500, HLE-250 and AA-LCR-25 run against each provider endpoint · Percentage of the reference endpoint, with 95% confidence interval · Higher is better

Composite measure of how much of a model's accuracy a given provider endpoint preserves, from re-running BFCL v4-500, HLE-250 and AA-LCR-25 against that endpoint. Where a self-hosted reference endpoint exists, scores are expressed as a percentage of that reference (100 = matches reference); lower scores indicate accuracy lost to quantisation, sampling defaults, or other endpoint-side configuration. Scores are point-in-time snapshots. Methodology.

Output Speed vs. Price: gpt-oss-120b (high)

Output tokens per second · USD per 1M tokens (blended) · 10,000 input tokens
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Smaller, emerging providers are offering high output speed and at competitive prices.

Preços (acerto de cache, entrada e saída): gpt-oss-120b (high)

Price (USD per M Tokens) · Lower is better · 10,000 input tokens

Price per token for cached prompts (previously processed), typically offering a significant discount compared to regular input price, represented as USD per million tokens. The values shown here are the cache hit price; cache write and cache storage are billed separately and vary by provider — see "Cache pricing by provider" for detail.

Output Speed: gpt-oss-120b (high)

Output speed: output tokens per second · 10,000 input tokens

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).