Todas as avaliações

AA-Omniscience v1.1: Knowledge and Hallucination Benchmark

A benchmark measuring factual recall and hallucination across various economically relevant domains.
Ver tarefas de exemplo

Publicação

Ver no arXiv

AA-Omniscience: Evaluating Cross-Domain Knowledge Reliability in Large Language Models

Declan Jackson, William Keating, George Cameron e Micah Hill-Smith.

AA-Omniscience

Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) alcança a maior pontuação em AA-Omniscience, com 67, seguido por Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback), com pontuação de 65 e Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback), com pontuação de 64

AA-Omniscience Accuracy

Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) alcança a maior pontuação em AA-Omniscience Accuracy, com 79%, seguido por Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback), com pontuação de 78% e Claude Fable 5.2 (High, Default Fallback), com pontuação de 77%

AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate

Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) alcança a menor pontuação em AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate, com 4%, seguido por Gemini 4 Argon (High), com pontuação de 4% e Gemini 4 Hydrogen (Xhigh), com pontuação de 8%

Pontuação

AA-Omniscience v1.1: Pontuação líquida

AA-Omniscience v1.1 Net Score (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.
No publicly available API

Pontuação líquida do AA-Omniscience vs. custo por tarefa

Pontuação líquida do AA-Omniscience · Custo médio por tarefa (USD)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Pontuação líquida do AA-Omniscience

Pontuação líquida do AA-Omniscience vs. Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Pontuação líquida do AA-Omniscience · Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Most attractive quadrant

Pontuação líquida do AA-Omniscience: v1 → v1.1

Pontuação líquida do AA-Omniscience (quanto maior, melhor) · A v1.1 removeu as perguntas saturadas, por isso a maioria dos modelos tem pontuação menor; isso reflete a mudança no conjunto de dados, não uma piora dos modelos.
Ordenar por

AA-Omniscience v1.1: perguntas públicas vs. privadas

Pontuação líquida do AA-Omniscience (quanto maior, melhor) · Em 86 modelos no lançamento da v1.1 (out. de 2026): r = 0.991; diferença média público − privado −0.2 pontos
Most attractive quadrant

Precisão do AA-Omniscience

Precisão do AA-Omniscience

AA-Omniscience v1.1 Accuracy (higher is better) measures the proportion of correctly answered questions out of all questions, regardless of whether the model chooses to answer
No publicly available API

Taxa de alucinação do AA-Omniscience

Taxa de alucinação do AA-Omniscience

AA-Omniscience v1.1 Hallucination Rate (lower is better) measures how often the model answers incorrectly when it should have refused or admitted to not knowing the answer. It is defined as the proportion of incorrect answers out of all non-correct responses, i.e. incorrect / (incorrect + partial answers + not attempted)
No publicly available API

Pontuação detalhada por domínio

Pontuação líquida do AA-Omniscience por domínio (normalizada)

Pontuação líquida do AA-Omniscience · As pontuações são normalizadas por domínio entre todos os modelos testados: verde indica a maior pontuação e vermelho, a menor naquele domínio.

Análise detalhada de engenharia de software

Pontuação líquida do AA-Omniscience em engenharia de software por linguagem (normalizada)

Pontuação líquida do AA-Omniscience em engenharia de software · As pontuações são normalizadas por linguagem entre todos os modelos testados: verde indica a maior pontuação e vermelho, a menor naquela linguagem.

Distribuição de perguntas do AA-Omniscience

Distribuição de perguntas entre os domínios e subdomínios do benchmark AA-Omniscience

Negócios

Humanidades e ciências sociais

Ciências, engenharia e matemática

Saúde

Direito

Engenharia de software (SWE)

Tamanho do modelo (somente modelos de pesos abertos)

Pontuação líquida do AA-Omniscience vs. parâmetros totais

Pontuação líquida do AA-Omniscience · Tamanho em bilhões de parâmetros
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Precisão do AA-Omniscience vs. parâmetros totais

Precisão do AA-Omniscience · Tamanho em bilhões de parâmetros
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Taxa de alucinação do AA-Omniscience vs. parâmetros totais

Taxa de alucinação do AA-Omniscience · Tamanho em bilhões de parâmetros
Most attractive quadrant

Uso de tokens

AA-Omniscience v1.1: uso de tokens

Tokens usados para executar a avaliação
No publicly available API

Custo

AA-Omniscience v1.1: custo por tarefa

Custo médio por tarefa (centavos de USD), detalhado em tokens de entrada, acertos e gravações de cache, raciocínio e resposta

Pontuação vs. data de lançamento

AA-Omniscience v1.1: pontuação líquida vs. data de lançamento

Most attractive region

Tarefas de exemplo

Explorar avaliações

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1

A composite benchmark aggregating nine challenging evaluations to provide a holistic measure of AI capabilities across knowledge work, coding, science, and general knowledge.

AA-Briefcase v1.1: Agentic Knowledge Work BenchmarkAA-Briefcase v1.1: Agentic Knowledge Work Benchmark

A private evaluation developed by Artificial Analysis for frontier agentic capability in long-horizon knowledge work, testing agents on realistic business workflows that require deliverables such as spreadsheets, presentations, and memos.

AA-3D: Interactive 3D Experience BenchmarkAA-3D: Interactive 3D Experience Benchmark

A benchmark developed by Artificial Analysis for how well AI models build interactive 3D experiences. Models work as agents in an offline sandbox via Stirrup to turn a written brief into a three.js scene, with Elo ratings derived from blind pairwise votes.

APEX-Agents-AA BenchmarkAPEX-Agents-AA Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of the APEX-Agents benchmark, testing AI agents on long-horizon, cross-application tasks in professional-services environments with realistic application tooling.

AA-AnalystAgent BenchmarkAA-AnalystAgent Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' data analysis benchmark, testing AI agents on their ability to work with spreadsheets and documents to answer quantitative questions a Business Analyst or Data Analyst would face day-to-day.

AutomationBench-AA: Agentic SaaS Workflow BenchmarkAutomationBench-AA: Agentic SaaS Workflow Benchmark

A benchmark measuring agentic task completion across simulated SaaS application environments, scoring the share of each task's objectives completed without guardrail violations.

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 BenchmarkHarvey LAB-AA v1.1 Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB), testing AI agents on real-world legal work from Harvey's dataset of 120 private tasks spanning 24 legal practice areas. v1.1, built in collaboration with Harvey, checks every deliverable against the task's source documents for hallucinations, so work that passes every rubric criterion but contains a material hallucination receives no credit. A panel of three judges grades each deliverable criterion-by-criterion.

GDP.pdf BenchmarkGDP.pdf Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of Surge AI's GDP.pdf benchmark, testing whether language models can reason over long, real-world professional documents and satisfy detailed task-specific criteria.

EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA BenchmarkEnterpriseOps-Gym-AA Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' independent implementation of ServiceNow's EnterpriseOps-Gym, an agentic benchmark testing whether LLM agents can complete stateful, multi-step enterprise workflows across eight business domains via live tool use, graded on the final state of the underlying databases.

Terminal-Bench 4.0 BenchmarkTerminal-Bench 4.0 Benchmark

A harder 66-task benchmark of complex terminal work across software, machine learning, science, operations, security, hardware, and media, with recalibrated compute and time allowances and improved instructions, environments, and verifiers.

Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 BenchmarkTerminal-Bench-Science 0.1 Benchmark

A 70-task benchmark of research workflows authored and reviewed by domain experts across the life, physical, earth, mathematical, and engineering sciences, each completed in a terminal and checked by its own set of tests.

FrontierCode-AA 2.0 BenchmarkFrontierCode-AA 2.0 Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of Cognition's FrontierCode 2.0, a private agentic coding benchmark of 132 tasks in real open-source repositories, graded on whether a maintainer would merge the agent's change.

HLE-Diamond BenchmarkHLE-Diamond Benchmark

A refined and updated 1,000-question set of Humanity's Last Exam, split evenly between reasoning and knowledge questions, with 272 questions that include an image.

AA-PersonalityBench: AI Personality & Communication Style BenchmarkAA-PersonalityBench: AI Personality & Communication Style Benchmark

Measures how models communicate rather than whether they are correct: 30 judged personality traits rolled up into 8 indexes, plus 21 measured communication characteristics.

AA-Omniscience v1.1: Knowledge and Hallucination BenchmarkAA-Omniscience v1.1: Knowledge and Hallucination Benchmark

A benchmark measuring factual recall and hallucination across various economically relevant domains.

GPQA Diamond Benchmark

The most challenging 198 questions from GPQA, where PhD experts achieve 65% accuracy but skilled non-experts only reach 34% despite web access.

ITBench-AA BenchmarkITBench-AA Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of IBM's ITBench benchmark, testing AI agents on Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis from offline incident snapshots. The agent inspects alerts, events, traces, and topology and identifies the contributing-factor entities (deployments, pods, namespaces, network policies, etc.) responsible for the failure.

MMMU-Pro BenchmarkMMMU-Pro Benchmark

An enhanced MMMU benchmark that eliminates shortcuts and guessing strategies to more rigorously test multimodal models across 30 academic disciplines.

IFBench BenchmarkIFBench Benchmark

A benchmark evaluating precise instruction-following generalization on 58 diverse, verifiable out-of-domain constraints that test models' ability to follow specific output requirements.

MLCR-AA: Medical Long Context Reasoning BenchmarkMLCR-AA: Medical Long Context Reasoning Benchmark

An open benchmark from Wisedocs measuring how well models reason over long, fragmented medical records, performing the multi-document synthesis claims professionals rely on when reviewing insurance and healthcare cases.

Code2Video-AA BenchmarkCode2Video-AA Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of HeyGen's Code2Video Bench, evaluating how well models create short product and brand videos from 114 design briefs using HyperFrames HTML.

HealthBench BenchmarkHealthBench Benchmark

OpenAI's HealthBench: 5,000 health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics, from emergency referrals to global health.

CritPt v2 BenchmarkCritPt v2 Benchmark

CritPt v2 is the revised version of CritPt, a benchmark designed to test LLMs on research-level physics reasoning tasks, featuring 70 composite research challenges. Models solve problems with a code-execution tool in an offline Linux sandbox.

VIALS-AA BenchmarkVIALS-AA Benchmark

VIALS-AA is Artificial Analysis' implementation of Handshake AI's VIALS benchmark. It tests whether language models can interpret scientific images and answer questions about the evidence they contain.

Multimodal Knowledge Agent (MKA) BenchmarkMultimodal Knowledge Agent (MKA) Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of Google DeepMind's Multimodal Knowledge Agent (MKA) benchmark. It tests whether agents can read visually dense project files, such as architectural drawings, engineering schematics and clinical scans, and produce the deliverables a professional would.

GDPval-AA v2.1 BenchmarkGDPval-AA v2.1 Benchmark

GDPval-AA v2.1 is Artificial Analysis' evaluation framework for OpenAI's GDPval dataset. It tests AI models on real-world tasks across 44 occupations and 9 major industries. Models are given shell access and web browsing capabilities in an agentic loop via Stirrup to solve tasks, with Elo ratings derived from blind pairwise comparisons.

𝜏³-Banking Benchmark𝜏³-Banking Benchmark

A fintech customer-support benchmark from the 𝜏-Knowledge framework that tests whether agents can navigate a large unstructured knowledge base and execute multi-step tool calls to resolve realistic banking workflows.

Terminal-Bench 2.1 BenchmarkTerminal-Bench 2.1 Benchmark

A verified refresh of Terminal-Bench 2.0: 89 curated tasks across software engineering, system administration, data processing, model training, and security, with environment and instruction fixes so scores reflect agent capability rather than environment gaps.

FrontierCode 1.1 BenchmarkFrontierCode 1.1 Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of Cognition's FrontierCode 1.1, a private agentic coding benchmark that tests models on completing coding tasks in a way that would actually get merged by maintainers of real-world repositories.

AA-LCR v1.1: Long Context Reasoning BenchmarkAA-LCR v1.1: Long Context Reasoning Benchmark

A challenging benchmark measuring language models' ability to extract, reason about, and synthesize information from long-form documents ranging from 10k to 100k tokens (measured using the cl100k_base tokenizer).

SciCode BenchmarkSciCode Benchmark

A scientist-curated coding benchmark featuring 288 test set subproblems from 80 laboratory problems across 16 scientific disciplines.

Humanity's Last Exam BenchmarkHumanity's Last Exam Benchmark

A frontier-level benchmark with 2,500 expert-vetted questions across mathematics, sciences, and humanities, designed to be the final closed-ended academic evaluation.

CritPt BenchmarkCritPt Benchmark

A benchmark designed to test LLMs on research-level physics reasoning tasks, featuring 71 composite research challenges.

Terminal-Bench Hard BenchmarkTerminal-Bench Hard Benchmark

An agentic benchmark evaluating AI capabilities in terminal environments through software engineering, system administration, and data processing tasks.

𝜏²-Bench Telecom Benchmark𝜏²-Bench Telecom Benchmark

A dual-control conversational AI benchmark simulating technical support scenarios where both agent and user must coordinate actions to resolve telecom service issues.

MMLU-Pro BenchmarkMMLU-Pro Benchmark

An enhanced version of MMLU with 12,000 graduate-level questions across 14 subject areas, featuring ten answer options and deeper reasoning requirements.

LiveCodeBench BenchmarkLiveCodeBench Benchmark

A contamination-free coding benchmark that continuously harvests fresh competitive programming problems from LeetCode, AtCoder, and CodeForces, evaluating code generation, self-repair, and execution.

MATH-500 BenchmarkMATH-500 Benchmark

A 500-problem subset from the MATH dataset, featuring competition-level mathematics across six domains including algebra, geometry, and number theory.

AIME 2025 BenchmarkAIME 2025 Benchmark

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination, testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999.

Global-MMLU-Lite BenchmarkGlobal-MMLU-Lite Benchmark

A lightweight, multilingual version of MMLU, designed to evaluate knowledge and reasoning skills across a diverse range of languages and cultural contexts.