Todas as avaliações

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 Benchmark Leaderboard

Artificial Analysis' implementation of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB), testing AI agents on real-world legal work from Harvey's dataset of 120 private tasks spanning 24 legal practice areas. v1.1, built in collaboration with Harvey, checks every deliverable against the task's source documents for hallucinations, so work that passes every rubric criterion but contains a material hallucination receives no credit. A panel of three judges grades each deliverable criterion-by-criterion.
Ver tarefas de exemplo

Novidades da v1.1

A v1.1 substitui a v1.0, e as pontuações não são comparáveis entre versões. Os estudos da Harvey com profissionais do direito constataram que as alucinações são um fator principal na escolha dos resultados preferidos pelos advogados, por isso colaboramos com a Harvey para adicionar uma verificação de alucinações à pontuação.

  • O conjunto de dados privado mais recente da Harvey, com melhorias nas tarefas e nos critérios
  • Uma nova verificação de alucinações em cada entregável com base nos documentos-fonte da tarefa, com alucinações materiais penalizadas na pontuação
  • Avaliadores atualizados para GPT-6 Sol, Grok 4.7 e Claude Opus 5.5. Encontramos autopreferência mínima e tiramos a média dos três para mitigar qualquer viés

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1

Muse Wonder Full (Max) alcança a maior pontuação em Harvey LAB-AA v1.1, com 13.1%, seguido por Muse Wonder (Max), com pontuação de 10.0% e Grok 4.7 (Xhigh), com pontuação de 9.4%

Pontuação

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: Taxa de aprovação total com filtro de alucinações

Média por tarefa da porcentagem do painel de avaliadores que considera todos os critérios de avaliação cumpridos; uma tarefa com qualquer alucinação relevante vale zero · Medido de forma independente pela Artificial Analysis
No publicly available API

Alucinações

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: Alucinações por tarefa

Upheld hallucination flags per task, split by severity · Material flags would mislead a reader on a substantive point, minor flags are real errors unlikely to affect the legal interpretation, and only material flags affect the headline score · Lower is better
No publicly available API

Taxa de quase aprovação com filtro de alucinações

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: Taxa de quase aprovação com filtro de alucinações

Average over tasks of the share of the judge panel that missed 0, <=1 and <=2 criteria · Tasks with at least 1 material hallucination count at 0% · Higher is better
Ordenar por critérios não atendidos
No publicly available API

Comparações de pontuação

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: Taxa de aprovação total com filtro de alucinações vs. Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

A taxa de aprovação total com filtro de alucinações é a porcentagem média do painel de avaliadores que considera todos os critérios cumpridos; uma tarefa com qualquer alucinação relevante vale zero · O Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index mede a capacidade geral em toda a bateria de avaliações do índice · Quanto maior em ambos os eixos, melhor
Most attractive quadrant

Custo

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: custo por tarefa

Custo médio por tarefa (USD), detalhado em tokens de entrada, acertos e gravações de cache, raciocínio e resposta

Uso de tokens

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: tokens de saída por tarefa

Tokens de saída usados para executar uma tarefa, detalhados em tokens de raciocínio e resposta
No publicly available API

Velocidade

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: tempo por tarefa

Weighted average decode time (minutes) per task; excludes TTFT and overhead time · Lower is better

Turnos

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: Turnos médios por tarefa

Average number of model turns per Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 task · Lower is better
No publicly available API

Pontuação por área de prática

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: Taxa de aprovação total com filtro de alucinações por área de prática (normalizado)

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: taxa de aprovação total com filtro de alucinações por área de prática jurídica · Cinco tarefas por área de prática · As pontuações são normalizadas por área de prática entre os modelos exibidos; verde indica a pontuação mais alta e vermelho a mais baixa dessa área · As áreas de prática em que todos os modelos exibidos têm o mesmo valor são coloridas de acordo com esse valor

Tamanho do modelo (somente modelos de pesos abertos)

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: Taxa de aprovação total com filtro de alucinações vs. Parâmetros totais

Taxa de aprovação total com filtro de alucinações de Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 · Tamanho em parâmetros (bilhões) · Somente modelos de pesos abertos
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Pontuação vs. data de lançamento

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: Taxa de aprovação total com filtro de alucinações vs. Data de lançamento

Most attractive region

Exemplos de tarefas e entregas

Explore tarefas representativas do conjunto público de Harvey LAB, os arquivos de referência fornecidos a cada modelo e os entregáveis que produziu.

Mergers & Acquisitions

Instruções

Review the attached acquisition data room contracts and internal memo for change of control and assignment provisions, and prepare a comprehensive deal team report.

Output: coc-analysis-report.docx

Entregáveis

Resultados que o modelo deve produzir

  • coc-analysis-report.docxA comprehensive deal team report analyzing change of control and assignment provisions across the target’s material contracts.

Arquivos de referência

Fornecidos ao modelo

Abrir
Abrir
Abrir
Abrir
Abrir
Abrir
Abrir
Abrir
Abrir
Abrir
Abrir
Abrir
Abrir
Abrir
Abrir
Abrir
Abrir
Abrir
Abrir

Entregas dos modelos

Entregáveis produzidos por cada modelo

Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback) - coc-analysis-report.docx
Abrir

Classificação

Criador
Nome
Hallucination-Gated All-Pass Rate
Criterion Pass Rate
Alucinações relevantes por tarefa
Custo por tarefa
Data de lançamento
1
Meta logoMeta
Muse Wonder Full (Max)13.1%95.5%0.62-out. de 2026
2
Meta logoMeta
Muse Wonder (Max)10.0%95.1%0.89$13.86out. de 2026
3
SpaceXAI logoSpaceXAI
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)9.4%92.8%0.74$9.49set. de 2026
4
Meta logoMeta
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)8.9%96.0%1.68$4.21set. de 2026
5
OpenAI logoOpenAI
GPT-6 Astra (Max)8.6%90.6%0.03$13.67set. de 2026
6
OpenAI logoOpenAI
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)6.9%90.6%0.09$2.48set. de 2026
7
Anthropic logoAnthropic
Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback)6.4%92.4%1.32$21.73set. de 2026
8
Kimi logoKimi
Kimi K3 (Max)5.3%93.0%2.09$6.19jul. de 2026
9
Anthropic logoAnthropic
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)4.2%90.0%0.59$17.93set. de 2026
10
Google logoGoogle
Gemini 4 Argon (High)3.9%94.8%3.82$6.29set. de 2026
11
OpenAI logoOpenAI
GPT-6 Sol (Max)3.6%86.9%0.07$3.33set. de 2026
12
OpenAI logoOpenAI
GPT-6 Luna (Max)3.3%86.0%0.38$0.22set. de 2026
13
Mistral logoMistral
Mistral Large 4 Preview3.1%93.0%2.11$2.54out. de 2026
14
Anthropic logoAnthropic
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)2.8%92.1%1.03$14.03set. de 2026
15
Anthropic logoAnthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)2.8%88.0%1.61$0.43out. de 2026

Explorar avaliações

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2

A composite benchmark aggregating ten challenging evaluations to provide a holistic measure of AI capabilities across mathematics, science, coding, and reasoning.

AA-Briefcase v1.1: Agentic Knowledge Work BenchmarkAA-Briefcase v1.1: Agentic Knowledge Work Benchmark

A private evaluation developed by Artificial Analysis for frontier agentic capability in long-horizon knowledge work, testing agents on realistic business workflows that require deliverables such as spreadsheets, presentations, and memos.

GDPval-AA v2.1 LeaderboardGDPval-AA v2.1 Leaderboard

GDPval-AA v2.1 is Artificial Analysis' evaluation framework for OpenAI's GDPval dataset. It tests AI models on real-world tasks across 44 occupations and 9 major industries. Models are given shell access and web browsing capabilities in an agentic loop via Stirrup to solve tasks, with Elo ratings derived from blind pairwise comparisons.

AA-3D: Interactive 3D Experience BenchmarkAA-3D: Interactive 3D Experience Benchmark

A benchmark developed by Artificial Analysis for how well AI models build interactive 3D experiences. Models work as agents in an offline sandbox via Stirrup to turn a written brief into a three.js scene, with Elo ratings derived from blind pairwise votes.

APEX-Agents-AA Benchmark LeaderboardAPEX-Agents-AA Benchmark Leaderboard

Artificial Analysis' implementation of the APEX-Agents benchmark, testing AI agents on long-horizon, cross-application tasks in professional-services environments with realistic application tooling.

AA-AnalystAgent Benchmark LeaderboardAA-AnalystAgent Benchmark Leaderboard

Artificial Analysis' data analysis benchmark, testing AI agents on their ability to work with spreadsheets and documents to answer quantitative questions a Business Analyst or Data Analyst would face day-to-day.

AutomationBench-AA: Agentic SaaS Workflow BenchmarkAutomationBench-AA: Agentic SaaS Workflow Benchmark

A benchmark measuring agentic task completion across simulated SaaS application environments, scoring the share of each task's objectives completed without guardrail violations.

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 Benchmark LeaderboardHarvey LAB-AA v1.1 Benchmark Leaderboard

Artificial Analysis' implementation of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB), testing AI agents on real-world legal work from Harvey's dataset of 120 private tasks spanning 24 legal practice areas. v1.1, built in collaboration with Harvey, checks every deliverable against the task's source documents for hallucinations, so work that passes every rubric criterion but contains a material hallucination receives no credit. A panel of three judges grades each deliverable criterion-by-criterion.

GDP.pdf Benchmark LeaderboardGDP.pdf Benchmark Leaderboard

Artificial Analysis' implementation of Surge AI's GDP.pdf benchmark, testing whether language models can reason over long, real-world professional documents and satisfy detailed task-specific criteria.

EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA Benchmark LeaderboardEnterpriseOps-Gym-AA Benchmark Leaderboard

Artificial Analysis' independent implementation of ServiceNow's EnterpriseOps-Gym, an agentic benchmark testing whether LLM agents can complete stateful, multi-step enterprise workflows across eight business domains via live tool use, graded on the final state of the underlying databases.

Terminal-Bench 4.0 Benchmark LeaderboardTerminal-Bench 4.0 Benchmark Leaderboard

A harder 66-task benchmark of complex terminal work across software, machine learning, science, operations, security, hardware, and media, with recalibrated compute and time allowances and improved instructions, environments, and verifiers.

Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 Benchmark LeaderboardTerminal-Bench-Science 0.1 Benchmark Leaderboard

A 70-task benchmark of research workflows authored and reviewed by domain experts across the life, physical, earth, mathematical, and engineering sciences, each completed in a terminal and checked by its own set of tests.

FrontierCode 1.1 Benchmark LeaderboardFrontierCode 1.1 Benchmark Leaderboard

Artificial Analysis' implementation of Cognition's FrontierCode 1.1, a private agentic coding benchmark that tests models on completing coding tasks in a way that would actually get merged by maintainers of real-world repositories.

AA-PersonalityBench: AI Personality & Communication StyleAA-PersonalityBench: AI Personality & Communication Style

Measures how models communicate rather than whether they are correct: 30 judged personality traits rolled up into 8 indexes, plus 21 measured communication characteristics.

Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning Benchmark LeaderboardArtificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning Benchmark Leaderboard

A challenging benchmark measuring language models' ability to extract, reason about, and synthesize information from long-form documents ranging from 10k to 100k tokens (measured using the cl100k_base tokenizer).

AA-Omniscience: Knowledge and Hallucination BenchmarkAA-Omniscience: Knowledge and Hallucination Benchmark

A benchmark measuring factual recall and hallucination across various economically relevant domains.

SciCode Benchmark LeaderboardSciCode Benchmark Leaderboard

A scientist-curated coding benchmark featuring 288 test set subproblems from 80 laboratory problems across 16 scientific disciplines.

Humanity's Last Exam Benchmark LeaderboardHumanity's Last Exam Benchmark Leaderboard

A frontier-level benchmark with 2,500 expert-vetted questions across mathematics, sciences, and humanities, designed to be the final closed-ended academic evaluation.

CritPt Benchmark LeaderboardCritPt Benchmark Leaderboard

A benchmark designed to test LLMs on research-level physics reasoning tasks, featuring 71 composite research challenges.

GPQA Diamond Benchmark Leaderboard

The most challenging 198 questions from GPQA, where PhD experts achieve 65% accuracy but skilled non-experts only reach 34% despite web access.

ITBench-AA Benchmark LeaderboardITBench-AA Benchmark Leaderboard

Artificial Analysis' implementation of IBM's ITBench benchmark, testing AI agents on Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis from offline incident snapshots. The agent inspects alerts, events, traces, and topology and identifies the contributing-factor entities (deployments, pods, namespaces, network policies, etc.) responsible for the failure.

MMMU-Pro Benchmark LeaderboardMMMU-Pro Benchmark Leaderboard

An enhanced MMMU benchmark that eliminates shortcuts and guessing strategies to more rigorously test multimodal models across 30 academic disciplines.

IFBench Benchmark LeaderboardIFBench Benchmark Leaderboard

A benchmark evaluating precise instruction-following generalization on 58 diverse, verifiable out-of-domain constraints that test models' ability to follow specific output requirements.

Medical Long Context Reasoning (MLCR-AA)Medical Long Context Reasoning (MLCR-AA)

An open benchmark from Wisedocs measuring how well models reason over long, fragmented medical records, performing the multi-document synthesis claims professionals rely on when reviewing insurance and healthcare cases.

HealthBench Benchmark LeaderboardHealthBench Benchmark Leaderboard

OpenAI's HealthBench: 5,000 health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics, from emergency referrals to global health.

HealthBench Professional Benchmark LeaderboardHealthBench Professional Benchmark Leaderboard

OpenAI's HealthBench Professional: 525 clinician conversations covering consult, writing and research tasks, graded against physician-written rubrics.

𝜏³-Banking Benchmark Leaderboard𝜏³-Banking Benchmark Leaderboard

A fintech customer-support benchmark from the 𝜏-Knowledge framework that tests whether agents can navigate a large unstructured knowledge base and execute multi-step tool calls to resolve realistic banking workflows.

Terminal-Bench 2.1 Benchmark LeaderboardTerminal-Bench 2.1 Benchmark Leaderboard

A verified refresh of Terminal-Bench 2.0 — 89 curated tasks across software engineering, system administration, data processing, model training, and security, with environment and instruction fixes so scores reflect agent capability rather than environment gaps.

Terminal-Bench Hard Benchmark LeaderboardTerminal-Bench Hard Benchmark Leaderboard

An agentic benchmark evaluating AI capabilities in terminal environments through software engineering, system administration, and data processing tasks.

𝜏²-Bench Telecom Benchmark Leaderboard𝜏²-Bench Telecom Benchmark Leaderboard

A dual-control conversational AI benchmark simulating technical support scenarios where both agent and user must coordinate actions to resolve telecom service issues.

MMLU-Pro Benchmark LeaderboardMMLU-Pro Benchmark Leaderboard

An enhanced version of MMLU with 12,000 graduate-level questions across 14 subject areas, featuring ten answer options and deeper reasoning requirements.

LiveCodeBench Benchmark LeaderboardLiveCodeBench Benchmark Leaderboard

A contamination-free coding benchmark that continuously harvests fresh competitive programming problems from LeetCode, AtCoder, and CodeForces, evaluating code generation, self-repair, and execution.

MATH-500 Benchmark LeaderboardMATH-500 Benchmark Leaderboard

A 500-problem subset from the MATH dataset, featuring competition-level mathematics across six domains including algebra, geometry, and number theory.

AIME 2025 Benchmark LeaderboardAIME 2025 Benchmark Leaderboard

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination, testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999.

Global-MMLU-Lite Benchmark LeaderboardGlobal-MMLU-Lite Benchmark Leaderboard

A lightweight, multilingual version of MMLU, designed to evaluate knowledge and reasoning skills across a diverse range of languages and cultural contexts.