Comparação de modelos: análise de inteligência, desempenho e preço

Name: Inteligência
Creator: Artificial Analysis
License: https://artificialanalysis.ai/docs/legal/Terms-of-Use.pdf

Ambiente de testes Microevals

Clique em qualquer modelo para ver métricas detalhadas. Para mais detalhes, inclusive sobre nossa metodologia, consulte as perguntas frequentes.

Inteligência

Updated

Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback) e

Claude Fable 5.1 (xhigh with fallback) são os modelos com maior inteligência, seguidos por

GPT-6 Astra (max) e

GPT-6 Astra (xhigh).

Velocidade de saída (tokens/s)

Celeris-1 (1460 t/s) e

Mercury 2 (881 t/s) são os modelos mais rápidos, seguidos por

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite e

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.

Latência (segundos)

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Non-reasoning) (0.28s) e

Command A+ (0.39s) são os modelos com menor latência, seguidos por

North Mini Code e

Granite 4.2 3B.

Preço ($ por milhão de tokens)

Devstral 2 ($0.00) e

North Mini Code ($0.00) são os modelos mais baratos, seguidos por

Gemma 3 4B e

Gemma 3 27B.

Janela de contexto

Llama 4 Scout (10M) e

Grok 4.20 0309 (2M) são os modelos com as maiores janelas de contexto, seguidos por

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May) e

Grok 4.1 Fast.

Destaques

Updated

Inteligência

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

Velocidade

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Custo por tarefa

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

InteligênciaUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3 incorporates 10 evaluations: AA-Briefcase, GDPval-AA v2, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench v4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3 includes: AA-Briefcase, GDPval-AA v2, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench v4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary

Indicates whether the model weights are available. Models are labelled as 'Commercial Use Restricted' if commercial use is limited by conditions, and as 'Non-commercial' if the license prohibits commercial use.

Avaliações

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better

AA-Briefcase

Agentic knowledge work, (Elo-500)/2000

GDPval-AA v2

Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000

AutomationBench-AAUpdated

Agentic SaaS workflows

Terminal-Bench v4.0New

Agentic coding & terminal use

SciCode

Coding

Humanity's Last Exam

Reasoning & knowledge

GDP.pdfNew

Professional document reasoning, All-pass

CritPt

Physics reasoning

AA-Omniscience Accuracy

Knowledge

AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate

1 - hallucination rate

AA-LCR v1.1

Long context reasoning

Harvey LAB-AA

Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate

EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA

Agentic business operations

AA-AnalystAgent

Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents

IFBench

Instruction following

𝜏³-Banking

Agentic tool use

APEX-Agents-AA

Long-horizon agentic tasks

ITBench-AA

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

MMMU-Pro

Visual reasoning

While model intelligence generally translates across use cases, specific evaluations may be more relevant for certain use cases.

AA-Briefcase

AA-Briefcase Elo

AA-Briefcase is an agentic knowledge work benchmark developed by Artificial Analysis. AA-Briefcase Elo is a combined metric that aggregates rubric pass rate, analytical quality Elo and presentation Elo · Higher is better

AA-Briefcase Elo is a combined metric that aggregates analytical quality Elo, presentation Elo, and rubric pass rate, with rubric performance converted into Elo via synthetic head-to-head matches. Elo and 95% confidence interval bounds are clamped at 0.

AA-Omniscience

AA-Omniscience Index

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.

Openness Index

Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score

Openness Index assesses model openness on a 0 to 100 normalized scale (higher is more open)

Comparações do Intelligence Index

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task

Most attractive quadrant

Pareto line

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Uso de tokens

Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average number of output tokens used to run one task in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

The number of tokens required per Intelligence Index task. This is calculated by multiplying the output tokens per eval by the relative weights of each benchmark in the Intelligence Index, then dividing by task count (excluding repeats).

Custo

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

The cost to run the evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, calculated using the model's input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices and the number of tokens used across evaluations (excluding repeats).

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Price (USD per M Tokens)

Price per token for cached prompts (previously processed), typically offering a significant discount compared to regular input price, represented as USD per million tokens. The values shown here are the cache hit price; cache write and cache storage are billed separately and vary by provider — see "Cache pricing by provider" for detail.

Janela de contexto

Context Window

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better

Larger context windows are relevant to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) LLM workflows which typically involve reasoning and information retrieval of large amounts of data.

Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).

Velocidade

Medida pela velocidade de saída (tokens por segundo)

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average decode time (minutes) per task; excludes TTFT and overhead time · Lower is better

The weighted average time (seconds) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task. This is calculated by dividing output tokens per task by output speed, weighted by the relative weights of each benchmark in the Intelligence Index.

Latência

Medida pelo tempo (segundos) até o primeiro token

Latency: Time To First Answer Token

Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time

Time to first answer token received, in seconds, after API request sent. For reasoning models, this includes the 'thinking' time of the model before providing an answer. For models which do not support streaming, this represents time to receive the completion.

Tempo de resposta de ponta a ponta

Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better

Seconds to receive a 500 token response. Key components:

Input time: Time to receive the first response token
Thinking time (only for reasoning models): Time reasoning models spend outputting tokens to reason prior to providing an answer. Amount of tokens based on the average reasoning tokens across a diverse set of 60 prompts (methodology details).
Answer time: Time to generate 500 output tokens, based on output speed

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Tamanho do modelo (somente modelos de pesos abertos)

Model Size: Total and Active Parameters

Comparison between total model parameters and parameters active during inference

The total number of trainable weights and biases in the model, expressed in billions. These parameters are learned during training and determine the model's ability to process and generate responses.

The number of parameters actually executed during each inference forward pass, expressed in billions. For Mixture of Experts (MoE) models, a routing mechanism selects a subset of experts per token, resulting in fewer active than total parameters. Dense models use all parameters, so active equals total.

Perguntas frequentes

Atualmente, Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) lidera o Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index com 53 pontos, entre 155 modelos avaliados.

Os melhores modelos de IA segundo o Intelligence Index são: 1. Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) (53), 2. Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback) (53), 3. GPT-6 Astra (max) (53), 4. GPT-6 Astra (xhigh) (53) e 5. Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort, Default Fallback) (51).

Celeris-1 é o mais rápido, com 1,459.7 tokens por segundo, seguido por Mercury 2 (880.8 t/s) e Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning) (415.9 t/s).

Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B é o mais acessível, com um preço combinado de $0.02 por 1M de tokens, seguido por Granite 4.2 3B ($0.02) e Nova Micro ($0.03).

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Non-reasoning) tem o menor tempo até o primeiro token, de 0.28s, seguido por Command A+ (0.39s) e North Mini Code (0.40s).

GLM-5.3 (max) é o modelo de pesos abertos mais bem classificado, com 45 pontos no Intelligence Index. Há 78 modelos de pesos abertos entre 155 modelos avaliados no total.

Os melhores modelos de IA de pesos abertos segundo o Intelligence Index são: 1. GLM-5.3 (max) (45), 2. Kimi K3 (max) (44) e 3. GLM-5.3-Flash (42).

Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) lidera entre 138 modelos de raciocínio, com 53 pontos no Intelligence Index. Os modelos de raciocínio usam um processo de reflexão prolongado para resolver problemas complexos antes de responder.

Os modelos são comparados em várias dimensões, incluindo inteligência (qualidade), preço, velocidade de saída (tokens por segundo), latência (tempo até o primeiro token), tempo de resposta de ponta a ponta e tamanho da janela de contexto. As métricas de desempenho são medidas diretamente com prompts padronizados em 650 modelos.

Clique no nome ou na linha de qualquer modelo nos gráficos para acessar sua página exclusiva, com métricas detalhadas e comparações diretas com modelos semelhantes. Você também pode usar o seletor de modelos para personalizar quais deles aparecem em cada gráfico. Ver o ranking

Comparação de modelos: análise de inteligência, desempenho e preço

InteligênciaUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Open Weights

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence Evaluation Relevance

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

AA-Briefcase

AA-Briefcase Elo

AA-Briefcase Elo

AA-Omniscience

AA-Omniscience Index

AA-Omniscience Index

Openness Index

Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score

Comparações do Intelligence Index

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Uso de tokens

Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task

Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task

Custo

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Cache Hit

Janela de contexto

Context Window

Context Window for RAG

Context Window

Velocidade

Output Speed

Output Speed

Model Performance Representation

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Latência

Latency: Time To First Answer Token

Time to First Answer Token

Tempo de resposta de ponta a ponta

End-to-End Response Time

End-to-End Response Time

Model Performance Representation

Tamanho do modelo (somente modelos de pesos abertos)

Model Size: Total and Active Parameters

Total Parameters

Active Parameters at Inference Time

Perguntas frequentes

Qual é o modelo de IA mais inteligente?

Quais são os melhores modelos de IA?

Qual é o modelo de IA mais rápido?

Qual é o modelo de IA mais barato?

Qual modelo de IA tem a menor latência?

Qual é o melhor modelo de IA de pesos abertos?

Quais são os melhores modelos de IA de pesos abertos?

Qual é o melhor modelo de raciocínio?

Como os modelos de IA são comparados na Artificial Analysis?

Como comparar um modelo específico com outros?