CoreWeave: Models Intelligence, Performance & Price

CoreWeave
CoreWeave

This analysis is intended to support you in choosing the best model provided by CoreWeave for your use-case.

Most Intelligent

Updated
#1
GLM-5.2 (max)GLM-5.2 (max)
42
#2
Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) (FP8)Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) (FP8)
41
#3
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max)DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max)
41
#4
Kimi K2.6Kimi K2.6
36
#5
MiniMax-M3 (NVFP4)MiniMax-M3 (NVFP4)
36

Intelligence index

Total 27 models

Fastest

#1
Kimi K2.7 CodeKimi K2.7 Code
311 t/s
#2
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (BF16)Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (BF16)
255 t/s
#3
Nemotron 3 UltraNemotron 3 Ultra
244 t/s
#4
GLM-5.2 (max)GLM-5.2 (max)
238 t/s
#5
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) (FP8)Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) (FP8)
229 t/s

Output speed

Total 27 models

Lowest Price

#1
gpt-oss-20b (high)gpt-oss-20b (high)
$0.04
#2
gpt-oss-20b (low)gpt-oss-20b (low)
$0.04
#3
gpt-oss-120b (high)gpt-oss-120b (high)
$0.04
#4
gpt-oss-120b (low)gpt-oss-120b (low)
$0.04
#5
Granite 4.1 8BGranite 4.1 8B
$0.06

Blended price (per 1M tokens)

Total 27 models

CoreWeave offers 27 models, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across models.

  • For intelligence, the top models on CoreWeave are GLM-5.2 (max) (42), Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) (FP8) (41), and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max) (41).
  • For output speed, the fastest models are Kimi K2.7 Code (311 t/s), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (BF16) (255 t/s), and Nemotron 3 Ultra (244 t/s).
  • For latency, Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 (Non-reasoning) (0.67s), Llama 3.1 8B (0.70s), and Granite 4.1 8B (0.80s) offer the lowest time to first answer token.
  • For pricing, gpt-oss-20b (high) ($0.04), gpt-oss-20b (low) ($0.04), and gpt-oss-120b (high) ($0.04) offer the lowest blended prices per 1M tokens.
  • For context window size, DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) (1M), DeepSeek V4 Flash (Non-reasoning) (1M), and GLM-5.2 (max) (262k) support the largest context windows on CoreWeave.

Highlights

Updated
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Output tokens per second · Higher is better
USD per 1M tokens (blended) · Lower is better

Intelligence Evaluations

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.2 incorporates 10 evaluations: AA-Briefcase, GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1
Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.2 includes: AA-Briefcase, GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better
See more

Agentic knowledge work, (Elo-500)/2000

Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000

Agentic tool use

Agentic coding & terminal use

Coding

Reasoning & knowledge

Professional document reasoning, All-pass

Physics reasoning

Long context reasoning

Agentic SaaS workflows

Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate

Agentic business operations

Scientific reasoning

Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents

Instruction following

Long-horizon agentic tasks

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

Visual reasoning

While model intelligence generally translates across use cases, specific evaluations may be more relevant for certain use cases.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.2 includes: AA-Briefcase, GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Intelligence Index vs. Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

While higher intelligence models are typically more expensive, they do not all follow the same price-quality curve.

Context Window

Context Window

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better

Larger context windows are relevant to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) LLM workflows which typically involve reasoning and information retrieval of large amounts of data.

Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).

Pricing

Intelligence Index vs. Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

While higher intelligence models are typically more expensive, they do not all follow the same price-quality curve.

Performance Summary

Output Speed vs. Price

Output speed: output tokens per second · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Price per token, shown in USD per million tokens. Price is a blend of cache hit, input, and output token prices using the selected ratio (default 7:2:1 cache-input-output).

Speed

Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Latency

Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token

Latency: Time To First Answer Token

Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time

Time to first answer token received, in seconds, after API request sent. For reasoning models, this includes the 'thinking' time of the model before providing an answer. For models which do not support streaming, this represents time to receive the completion.

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

End-to-End Response Time vs. Price

End-to-end response time: end-to-end seconds to output 500 tokens · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Price per token, shown in USD per million tokens. Price is a blend of cache hit, input, and output token prices using the selected ratio (default 7:2:1 cache-input-output).

Further Analysis
Z AI logo
GLM-5.2 (max)
262k
Open
42
$0.49
238
1.20
11.69
8.39
Alibaba logo
Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) (FP8)
262k
Open
41
$0.63
60
1.97
43.47
33.20
DeepSeek logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max)
262k
Open
41
$0.17
131
1.67
20.71
15.23
Kimi logo
Kimi K2.6
262k
Open
36*
--
216
1.10
24.06
20.64
MiniMax logo
MiniMax-M3 (NVFP4)
262k
Open
36
$0.18
166
1.23
16.28
12.04
Kimi logo
Kimi K2.7 Code
262k
Open
33
$0.39
311
1.06
9.85
7.18
Z AI logo
GLM-5 (FP8)
200k
Open
32*
--
--
--
--
--
DeepSeek logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash (high)
1M
Open
30*
--
77
1.58
24.09
16.04
NVIDIA logo
Nemotron 3 Ultra
262k
Open
29
$0.20
244
1.04
12.42
9.33
Kimi logo
Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning)
262k
Open
28*
--
192
1.12
3.73
--
Alibaba logo
Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) (FP8)
262k
Open
23*
--
69
1.74
8.95
--
Alibaba logo
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (FP8)
262k
Open
23*
--
218
1.02
12.49
9.18
Google logo
Gemma 4 31B
262k
Open
22*
--
68
1.96
35.05
25.69
DeepSeek logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Non-reasoning)
1M
Open
22*
--
78
1.58
7.99
--
NVIDIA logo
Nemotron 3 Super
262k
Open
19*
--
135
0.65
19.17
14.82
Alibaba logo
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) (FP8)
262k
Open
17*
--
229
1.00
3.19
--
NVIDIA logo
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (BF16)
262k
Open
16*
--
255
0.57
10.39
7.86
OpenAI logo
gpt-oss-120b (high)
131k
Open
16
$0.03
62
1.37
41.66
32.24
Google logo
Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)
262k
Open
15*
--
62
2.03
10.06
--
DeepSeek logo
DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)
128k
Open
15*
--
58
1.42
10.01
--
IBM logo
Granite 4.2 8B
131k
Open
14
$0.05
32
19.83
97.22
61.91
OpenAI logo
gpt-oss-20b (high)
131k
Open
9*
--
128
0.62
20.11
15.59
OpenAI logo
gpt-oss-120b (low)
131k
Open
9*
--
66
1.33
39.27
30.35
OpenAI logo
gpt-oss-20b (low)
131k
Open
8*
--
125
0.61
20.59
15.99
Meta logo
Llama 3.3 70B
128k
Open
4*
--
81
0.89
7.03
--
Alibaba logo
Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 (Non-reasoning)
262k
Open
3*
--
146
0.67
4.11
--
Meta logo
Llama 3.1 8B
128k
Open
2*
--
142
0.70
4.23
--
IBM logo
Granite 4.1 8B
131k
Open
1*
--
101
0.80
5.75
--

Key definitions

Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about CoreWeave

The most intelligent model available on CoreWeave is GLM-5.2 (max) with an Intelligence Index score of 42.

The fastest model on CoreWeave by output speed is Kimi K2.7 Code at 310.6 tokens per second.

The model with the lowest time to first answer token on CoreWeave is Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 (Non-reasoning) at 0.67s. Lower latency means faster initial response time.

The most affordable model on CoreWeave by blended price is gpt-oss-20b (high) at $0.04 per 1M tokens (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio).

Prices on CoreWeave vary up to 18x across models, from $0.04 per 1M tokens for gpt-oss-20b (high) to $0.71 per 1M tokens for Llama 3.3 70B.

Yes, CoreWeave offers an OpenAI-compatible API, making it easy to switch from OpenAI or use existing OpenAI SDK integrations.

Yes, all 27 models on CoreWeave support JSON mode for structured output.

Yes, all 27 models on CoreWeave support function calling (tool use).

Yes, all 27 models on CoreWeave are open weight models.

Yes, provider performance can vary over time due to infrastructure changes, load balancing, and updates. We continuously benchmark all providers and display historical performance trends in the "Over Time" charts.

When choosing a model on CoreWeave, consider: intelligence (for quality-sensitive tasks), output speed (for throughput-intensive tasks), latency (for interactive applications requiring quick first responses), pricing (for cost-sensitive workloads), and features like context window size, JSON mode, or function calling support.