CoreWeave: Models Intelligence, Performance & Price
This analysis is intended to support you in choosing the best model provided by CoreWeave for your use-case.
Most Intelligent
UpdatedIntelligence index
Total 35 models
Fastest
Output speed
Total 35 models
Lowest Price
Blended price (per 1M tokens)
Total 35 models
CoreWeave offers 35 models, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across models.
- For intelligence, the top models on CoreWeave are GLM-5.3-Flash (42), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) (39), and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max) (34).
- For output speed, the fastest models are Nemotron 3 Ultra (327 t/s), Kimi K2.7 Code (304 t/s), and Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) (FP8) (217 t/s). Speed varies significantly across models, with a 60% difference between the fastest and slowest.
- For latency, Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) (0.60s), Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 (Non-reasoning) (0.67s), and Llama 3.1 8B (0.71s) offer the lowest time to first answer token.
- For pricing, gpt-oss-20b (low) ($0.04), gpt-oss-20b (high) ($0.04), and gpt-oss-120b (high) ($0.04) offer the lowest blended prices per 1M tokens.
- For context window size, GLM-5.3-Flash (1M), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) (1M), and DeepSeek V4 Pro (max) (1M) support the largest context windows on CoreWeave.
Highlights
Intelligence Evaluations
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Evaluations
Agentic knowledge work, (Elo-500)/2000
Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000
Agentic SaaS workflows
Agentic coding & terminal use
Coding
Reasoning & knowledge
Professional document reasoning, All-pass
Physics reasoning
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Long context reasoning
Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate
Agentic business operations
Agentic scientific research workflows in a terminal
Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents
Agentic tool use
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Visual reasoning
Medical long context reasoning
Intelligence Index vs. Price
Context Window
Context Window
Pricing
Intelligence Index vs. Price
Performance Summary
Output Speed vs. Price
Speed
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time vs. Price
Further Analysis | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLM-5.3-Flash | 1M | Open | 42 | $0.76 | 172 | 1.61 | 16.12 | 11.61 | |||
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) | 1M | Open | 39 | $0.62 | 205 | 0.94 | 13.13 | 9.76 | |||
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max) | 262k | Open | 34 | $0.44 | 145 | 1.67 | 18.92 | 13.80 | |||
GLM-5.2 (max) | 262k | Open | 34 | $0.70 | 86 | 1.38 | 30.44 | 23.25 | |||
Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) (FP8) | 262k | Open | 34 | $0.92 | 66 | 1.70 | 39.37 | 30.13 | |||
DeepSeek V4 Pro (max) | 1M | Open | 30 | $2.00 | 180 | 1.29 | 28.37 | 24.30 | |||
MiniMax-M3 (NVFP4) | 262k | Open | 29 | -- | 71 | 1.40 | 36.55 | 28.12 | |||
GLM-5 (FP8) | 200k | Open | 28* | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |||
Kimi K2.6 | 262k | Open | 27 | $1.18 | 167 | 1.25 | 30.88 | 26.64 | |||
DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) | 1M | Open | 26* | -- | 76 | 1.59 | 24.42 | 16.27 | |||
Kimi K2.7 Code | 262k | Open | 26 | $0.83 | 304 | 1.08 | 10.07 | 7.34 | |||
Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning) | 262k | Open | 24* | -- | 135 | 1.16 | 4.85 | -- | |||
Nemotron 3 Ultra | 262k | Open | 23 | $0.51 | 327 | 1.00 | 9.48 | 6.95 | |||
Qwen3.6 27B (FP8) | 262k | Open | 21 | $0.27 | 69 | 1.72 | 91.78 | 82.77 | |||
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) | 1M | Open | 21* | -- | 186 | 1.29 | 3.97 | -- | |||
Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) (FP8) | 262k | Open | 20* | -- | 69 | 1.74 | 9.04 | -- | |||
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (FP8) | 262k | Open | 19* | -- | 212 | 1.06 | 12.86 | 9.44 | |||
Gemma 4 31B | 262k | Open | 19* | -- | 61 | 2.01 | 38.72 | 28.50 | |||
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Non-reasoning) | 1M | Open | 19* | -- | 77 | 1.61 | 8.11 | -- | |||
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (FP8) | 262k | Open | 18 | $0.31 | 169 | 1.08 | 35.88 | 31.84 | |||
Gemma 4 26B A4B | 262k | Open | 17* | -- | 96 | 0.67 | 26.73 | 20.85 | |||
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) (FP8) | 262k | Open | 15* | -- | 180 | 1.07 | 3.85 | -- | |||
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) (FP8) | 262k | Open | 15* | -- | 217 | 1.07 | 3.38 | -- | |||
Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) | 262k | Open | 14* | -- | 54 | 2.05 | 11.37 | -- | |||
DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) | 128k | Open | 14* | -- | 70 | 1.39 | 8.58 | -- | |||
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) | 262k | Open | 13* | -- | 99 | 0.60 | 5.65 | -- | |||
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (BF16) | 262k | Open | 13 | $0.10 | 140 | 0.64 | 18.44 | 14.24 | |||
gpt-oss-120b (high) | 131k | Open | 12 | $0.02 | 55 | 1.36 | 46.61 | 36.20 | |||
Granite 4.2 8B | 131k | Open | 11 | $0.05 | 59 | 0.78 | 43.04 | 33.81 | |||
gpt-oss-120b (low) | 131k | Open | 10* | -- | 47 | 1.36 | 54.72 | 42.69 | |||
gpt-oss-20b (low) | 131k | Open | 10* | -- | 165 | 0.60 | 15.77 | 12.14 | |||
gpt-oss-20b (high) | 131k | Open | 9 | $0.01 | 157 | 0.62 | 16.52 | 12.72 | |||
Llama 3.3 70B | 128k | Open | 8* | -- | 84 | 0.90 | 6.86 | -- | |||
Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 (Non-reasoning) | 262k | Open | 8* | -- | 165 | 0.67 | 3.69 | -- | |||
Llama 3.1 8B | 128k | Open | 7* | -- | 139 | 0.71 | 4.31 | -- | |||
Granite 4.1 8B | 131k | Open | 7* | -- | 126 | 0.76 | 4.74 | -- | |||
Key definitions
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CoreWeave
CoreWeave offers 35 models that we track: GLM-5.3-Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max), GLM-5.2 (max), Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) (FP8), DeepSeek V4 Pro (max), MiniMax-M3 (NVFP4), Kimi K2.6, DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Kimi K2.7 Code, Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning), Nemotron 3 Ultra, Qwen3.6 27B (FP8), DeepSeek V4 Pro (Non-reasoning), Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) (FP8), Qwen3.5 35B A3B (FP8), Gemma 4 31B, DeepSeek V4 Flash (Non-reasoning), Qwen3.6 35B A3B (FP8), Gemma 4 26B A4B, Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) (FP8), Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) (FP8), Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning), DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning), Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (BF16), gpt-oss-120b (high), Granite 4.2 8B, gpt-oss-120b (low), gpt-oss-20b (low), gpt-oss-20b (high), Llama 3.3 70B, Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 (Non-reasoning), Llama 3.1 8B, and Granite 4.1 8B.
The most intelligent model available on CoreWeave is GLM-5.3-Flash with an Intelligence Index score of 42.
The fastest model on CoreWeave by output speed is Nemotron 3 Ultra at 327.1 tokens per second.
The model with the lowest time to first answer token on CoreWeave is Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) at 0.60s. Lower latency means faster initial response time.
The most affordable model on CoreWeave by blended price is gpt-oss-20b (low) at $0.04 per 1M tokens (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio).
Prices on CoreWeave vary up to 18x across models, from $0.04 per 1M tokens for gpt-oss-20b (low) to $0.71 per 1M tokens for Llama 3.3 70B.
Yes, CoreWeave offers an OpenAI-compatible API, making it easy to switch from OpenAI or use existing OpenAI SDK integrations.
Yes, all 35 models on CoreWeave support JSON mode for structured output.
Yes, all 35 models on CoreWeave support function calling (tool use).
Yes, CoreWeave offers 22 reasoning models: GLM-5.3-Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max), GLM-5.2 (max), Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) (FP8), DeepSeek V4 Pro (max), MiniMax-M3 (NVFP4), Kimi K2.6, DeepSeek V4 Flash (high), Kimi K2.7 Code, Nemotron 3 Ultra, Qwen3.6 27B (FP8), Qwen3.5 35B A3B (FP8), Gemma 4 31B, Qwen3.6 35B A3B (FP8), Gemma 4 26B A4B, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (BF16), gpt-oss-120b (high), Granite 4.2 8B, gpt-oss-120b (low), gpt-oss-20b (low), and gpt-oss-20b (high). Reasoning models use extended thinking to work through complex problems before providing an answer.
Yes, all 35 models on CoreWeave are open weight models.
Yes, provider performance can vary over time due to infrastructure changes, load balancing, and updates. We continuously benchmark all providers and display historical performance trends in the "Over Time" charts.
When choosing a model on CoreWeave, consider: intelligence (for quality-sensitive tasks), output speed (for throughput-intensive tasks), latency (for interactive applications requiring quick first responses), pricing (for cost-sensitive workloads), and features like context window size, JSON mode, or function calling support.