CoreWeave: Models Intelligence, Performance & Price
Analysis of CoreWeave's models across key metrics including quality, price, output speed, latency, context window & more. This analysis is intended to support you in choosing the best model provided by CoreWeave for your use-case.
Most Intelligent
Intelligence index
Total 24 models
Fastest
Output speed
Total 24 models
Lowest Price
Blended price (per 1M tokens, 3:1 input-output ratio)
Total 24 models
CoreWeave offers 24 models, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across models.
- For intelligence, the top models on CoreWeave are Kimi K2.6 (54), GLM-5.1 (51), GLM-5 (FP8) (50).
- For output speed, the fastest models are gpt-oss-20B (low) (317 t/s), gpt-oss-20B (high) (306 t/s), Phi-4 Mini (234 t/s). Speed varies significantly across models, with a 106% difference between the fastest and slowest.
- For latency, Llama 4 Scout (0.68s), Kimi K2.6 (0.76s), Granite 4.1 8B (0.85s) offer the lowest time to first token.
- For pricing, DeepSeek V4 Flash ($0.01), Granite 4.1 8B ($0.06), gpt-oss-20B (high) ($0.09) offer the lowest blended prices per 1M tokens. Prices vary up to 10.0x across models.
- For context window size, DeepSeek V4 Flash (1m), NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (262k), Kimi K2.6 (262k) support the largest context windows on CoreWeave.
Highlights
Intelligence Evaluations
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Evaluations
Agentic real-world work tasks, (ELO-500)/2000
Agentic coding & terminal use
Agentic tool use
Long context reasoning
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Reasoning & knowledge
Scientific reasoning
Coding
Instruction following
Physics reasoning
Long-horizon agentic tasks
Visual reasoning
Intelligence vs. Price
Context Window
Context Window
JSON Mode & Function Calling
Function (Tool) Calling & JSON Mode
| Models | Function calling | JSON Mode |
|---|---|---|
Pricing
Intelligence vs. Price
Performance Summary
Output Speed vs. Price
Speed
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Time to First Answer Token
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time vs. Price
Key definitions
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CoreWeave
CoreWeave offers 24 models that we track: Kimi K2.6, GLM-5.1, GLM-5, Kimi K2.5, MiniMax-M2.5, Gemma 4 31B, DeepSeek V4 Flash, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super, gpt-oss-120B (high), Qwen3 235B A22B 2507, DeepSeek V3.1, Qwen3 235B 2507, Qwen3 Coder 480B, gpt-oss-120B (low), gpt-oss-20B (high), gpt-oss-20B (low), Gemma 4 E4B, Qwen3 30B A3B 2507, Gemma 4 E4B, Llama 3.3 70B, Llama 4 Scout, Granite 4.1 8B, Llama 3.1 8B, and Phi-4 Mini.
The most intelligent model available on CoreWeave is Kimi K2.6 with an Intelligence Index score of 54.
The fastest model on CoreWeave by output speed is gpt-oss-20B (low) at 316.8 tokens per second.
The model with the lowest time to first token on CoreWeave is Llama 4 Scout at 0.68s. Lower latency means faster initial response time.
The most affordable model on CoreWeave by blended price is DeepSeek V4 Flash at $0.01 per 1M tokens (3:1 input to output ratio).
Prices on CoreWeave vary up to 215x across models, from $0.01 per 1M tokens for DeepSeek V4 Flash to $2.15 per 1M tokens for GLM-5.1.
Yes, CoreWeave offers an OpenAI-compatible API, making it easy to switch from OpenAI or use existing OpenAI SDK integrations.
Yes, all 24 models on CoreWeave support JSON mode for structured output.
20 of 24 models on CoreWeave support function calling (tool use).
Yes, CoreWeave offers 13 reasoning models: Kimi K2.6, GLM-5.1, GLM-5, Kimi K2.5, MiniMax-M2.5, Gemma 4 31B, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super, gpt-oss-120B (high), Qwen3 235B A22B 2507, gpt-oss-120B (low), gpt-oss-20B (high), gpt-oss-20B (low), and Gemma 4 E4B. Reasoning models use extended thinking to work through complex problems before providing an answer.
Yes, all 24 models on CoreWeave are open weight models.
Yes, provider performance can vary over time due to infrastructure changes, load balancing, and updates. We continuously benchmark all providers and display historical performance trends in the "Over Time" charts.
When choosing a model on CoreWeave, consider: intelligence (for quality-sensitive tasks), output speed (for throughput-intensive tasks), latency (for interactive applications requiring quick first responses), pricing (for cost-sensitive workloads), and features like context window size, JSON mode, or function calling support.