Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning Benchmark Leaderboard
Background
Methodology
Related links
Highlights
- GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) scores the highest on AA-LCR with a score of 75.7%, followed by GPT-5 (high) with a score of 75.6%, and GPT-5.1 (high) with a score of 75.0%
Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning Benchmark Leaderboard: Results
Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning Benchmark Leaderboard: Token Usage
The total number of tokens used to run the evaluation, including input tokens (prompt), reasoning tokens (for reasoning models), and answer tokens (final response).
Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning Benchmark Leaderboard: Cost Breakdown
The cost to run the evaluation, calculated using the model's input and output token pricing and the number of tokens used.
Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning Benchmark Leaderboard: Score vs. Release Date
Example Problems
Explore Evaluations
A composite benchmark aggregating ten challenging evaluations to provide a holistic measure of AI capabilities across mathematics, science, coding, and reasoning.
GDPval-AA is Artificial Analysis' evaluation framework for OpenAI's GDPval dataset. It tests AI models on real-world tasks across 44 occupations and 9 major industries. Models are given shell access and web browsing capabilities in an agentic loop to solve tasks, with ELO ratings derived from blind pairwise comparisons.
A benchmark measuring factual recall and hallucination across various economically relevant domains.
A composite measure providing an industry standard to communicate model openness for users and developers.
An enhanced version of MMLU with 12,000 graduate-level questions across 14 subject areas, featuring ten answer options and deeper reasoning requirements.
A lightweight, multilingual version of MMLU, designed to evaluate knowledge and reasoning skills across a diverse range of languages and cultural contexts.
The most challenging 198 questions from GPQA, where PhD experts achieve 65% accuracy but skilled non-experts only reach 34% despite web access.
A frontier-level benchmark with 2,500 expert-vetted questions across mathematics, sciences, and humanities, designed to be the final closed-ended academic evaluation.
A contamination-free coding benchmark that continuously harvests fresh competitive programming problems from LeetCode, AtCoder, and CodeForces, evaluating code generation, self-repair, and execution.
A scientist-curated coding benchmark featuring 338 sub-tasks derived from 80 genuine laboratory problems across 16 scientific disciplines.
A 500-problem subset from the MATH dataset, featuring competition-level mathematics across six domains including algebra, geometry, and number theory.
A benchmark evaluating precise instruction-following generalization on 58 diverse, verifiable out-of-domain constraints that test models' ability to follow specific output requirements.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination, testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999.
A benchmark designed to test LLMs on research-level physics reasoning tasks, featuring 71 composite research challenges.
An agentic benchmark evaluating AI capabilities in terminal environments through software engineering, system administration, and data processing tasks.
A dual-control conversational AI benchmark simulating technical support scenarios where both agent and user must coordinate actions to resolve telecom service issues.
A challenging benchmark measuring language models' ability to extract, reason about, and synthesize information from long-form documents ranging from 10k to 100k tokens (measured using the cl100k_base tokenizer).
An enhanced MMMU benchmark that eliminates shortcuts and guessing strategies to more rigorously test multimodal models across 30 academic disciplines.