This model is deprecated. We only continue performance benchmarking for the default 10k input token workload. Results for other workloads are historical and no longer updated.

Kimi has launched a newer release, Kimi K2.6. We suggest considering it instead.

•
Kimi K2.5
•

Open weights model

•

Released January 2026

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) API Provider Benchmarking & Analysis

Model Comparison

This analysis is intended to support you in choosing the best API provider of Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) for your use-case.

Fastest

#1
AzureAzure
166.8 t/s
#2
NovitaNovita
53.4 t/s
#3
DeepInfraDeepInfra
40.6 t/s
#4
AmazonAmazon
39.5 t/s
#5
SiliconFlow (FP8)SiliconFlow (FP8)
28.0 t/s

Output speed

Total 5 providers

Lowest Latency

#1
AzureAzure
19.48 s
#2
NovitaNovita
57.46 s
#3
DeepInfraDeepInfra
74.59 s
#4
AmazonAmazon
77.14 s
#5
SiliconFlow (FP8)SiliconFlow (FP8)
108.12 s

Time to first answer token

Total 5 providers

Lowest Price

#1
DeepInfraDeepInfra
$0.36
#2
SiliconFlow (FP8)SiliconFlow (FP8)
$0.36
#3
NovitaNovita
$0.49
#4
AzureAzure
$0.84
#5
AmazonAmazon
$0.84

Blended price (per 1M tokens)

Total 5 providers

Kimi K2.5 is available through 5 API providers, each offering different performance characteristics and pricing. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across providers.

  • For output speed, the top providers are Azure (166.8 t/s), Novita (53.4 t/s), and DeepInfra (40.6 t/s). Speed varies significantly across providers, with a 495% difference between the fastest and slowest.
  • For latency, Azure (19.48s), Novita (57.46s), and DeepInfra (74.59s) offer the lowest time to first answer token.
  • For pricing, DeepInfra (0.36), SiliconFlow (FP8) (0.36), and Novita (0.49) offer the lowest blended prices per 1M tokens. Prices vary up to 2.3x across providers.
  • Azure offers the best performance with both the highest speed and lowest latency. For cost optimization, DeepInfra provides the most competitive pricing.

Highlights

Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Seconds to first answer token received · Lower is better
USD per 1M tokens (blended) · Lower is better

Pricing

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Price (USD per M Tokens) · Lower is better · 10,000 input tokens

Pricing: Blended Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended) · Lower is better

Pricing: Cache Discount

1 - (cache hit price / input price) · Higher is better

Output Speed vs. Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · Output speed: output tokens per second · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Speed

Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)

Output Speed: Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)

Output speed: output tokens per second · 10,000 input tokens

Latency vs. Output Speed

Latency: seconds to first token received · Output speed: output tokens per second · 10,000 input tokens
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Latency

Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token

Time to First Answer Token

Seconds to first token received · Lower is better · 10,000 input tokens

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better · 10,000 input tokens

Key Comparison Metrics & API Features

DeepInfra logoDeepInfra
262k
Open
--
41
1.56
85.80
72.10
SiliconFlow logoSiliconFlow
262k
Open
--
28
2.28
125.13
105.13
Microsoft Azure logoMicrosoft Azure
262k
Open
--
167
1.68
22.48
17.80
Amazon Bedrock logoAmazon Bedrock
256k
Open
--
39
1.94
89.81
75.20
Novita logoNovita
262k
Open
--
53
1.82
66.73
55.55

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) providers