Kimi: Models Intelligence, Performance & Price

Kimi
Kimi

Analysis of Kimi's models across key metrics including quality, price, output speed, latency, context window & more. This analysis is intended to support you in choosing the best model provided by Kimi for your use-case.

Most Intelligent

#1
Kimi K3 (max)
Kimi K3 (max)
60
#2
Kimi K3 (low)
Kimi K3 (low)
48
#3
Kimi K2.6
Kimi K2.6
45
#4
Kimi K2.7 Code
Kimi K2.7 Code
43
#5
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5
36

Intelligence index

Total 7 models

Fastest

#1
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5
58 t/s
#2
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5
58 t/s
#3
Kimi K2.6
Kimi K2.6
45 t/s
#4
Kimi K3 (low)
Kimi K3 (low)
42 t/s
#5
Kimi K3 (max)
Kimi K3 (max)
41 t/s

Output speed

Total 7 models

Lowest Price

#1
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5
$0.49
#2
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5
$0.49
#3
Kimi K2.6
Kimi K2.6
$0.70
#4
Kimi K2.6
Kimi K2.6
$0.70
#5
Kimi K2.7 Code
Kimi K2.7 Code
$0.72

Blended price (per 1M tokens)

Total 7 models

Indicates a reasoning model

Kimi offers 7 models, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across models.

  • For intelligence, the top models on Kimi are Kimi K3 (max) (60), Kimi K3 (low) (48), and Kimi K2.6 (45).
  • For output speed, the fastest models are Kimi K2.5 (58 t/s), Kimi K2.5 (58 t/s), and Kimi K2.6 (45 t/s).
  • For latency, Kimi K2.5 (2.89s), Kimi K2.6 (2.99s), and Kimi K3 (low) (50.97s) offer the lowest time to first answer token.
  • For pricing, Kimi K2.5 ($0.49), Kimi K2.5 ($0.49), and Kimi K2.6 ($0.70) offer the lowest blended prices per 1M tokens.
  • For context window size, Kimi K3 (max) (1M), Kimi K3 (low) (1M), and Kimi K2.6 (256k) support the largest context windows on Kimi.

Highlights

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Output tokens per second · Higher is better
USD per 1M tokens (blended) · Lower is better

Intelligence Evaluations

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better
See more

Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000

Agentic tool use

Agentic coding & terminal use

Coding

Reasoning & knowledge

Scientific reasoning

Physics reasoning

Knowledge

1 - hallucination rate

AA-LCRUpdated

Long context reasoning

Agentic knowledge work, Elo

Agentic SaaS workflows

Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate

Agentic business operations

Instruction following

Long-horizon agentic tasks

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

Visual reasoning

Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

While model intelligence generally translates across use cases, specific evaluations may be more relevant for certain use cases.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Intelligence Index vs. Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

While higher intelligence models are typically more expensive, they do not all follow the same price-quality curve.

Context Window

Context Window

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Larger context windows are relevant to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) LLM workflows which typically involve reasoning and information retrieval of large amounts of data.

Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).

Pricing

Intelligence Index vs. Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

While higher intelligence models are typically more expensive, they do not all follow the same price-quality curve.

Performance Summary

Output Speed vs. Price

Output speed: output tokens per second · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Price per token, shown in USD per million tokens. Price is a blend of cache hit, input, and output token prices using the selected ratio (default 7:2:1 cache-input-output).

Speed

Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Latency

Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token

Latency: Time To First Answer Token

Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Time to first answer token received, in seconds, after API request sent. For reasoning models, this includes the 'thinking' time of the model before providing an answer. For models which do not support streaming, this represents time to receive the completion.

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

End-to-End Response Time vs. Price

End-to-end response time: end-to-end seconds to output 500 tokens · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Price per token, shown in USD per million tokens. Price is a blend of cache hit, input, and output token prices using the selected ratio (default 7:2:1 cache-input-output).

Further Analysis
Kimi logo
Kimi K3 (max)
1.05M
Open
60
$0.84
41
3.03
64.60
49.26
Kimi logo
Kimi K3 (low)
1.05M
Open
48
$0.24
42
3.38
62.87
47.60
Kimi logo
Kimi K2.6
256k
Open
45
$0.37
45
2.82
113.09
99.14
Kimi logo
Kimi K2.7 Code
256k
Open
43
$0.22
40
2.98
71.26
55.77
Kimi logo
Kimi K2.5
256k
Open
36
$0.10
58
2.82
62.73
51.27
Kimi logo
Kimi K2.6
256k
Open
35*
--
40
2.99
15.44
--
Kimi logo
Kimi K2.5
256k
Open
30*
--
58
2.89
11.49
--

Key definitions

Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Kimi

Kimi offers 7 models that we track: Kimi K3 (max), Kimi K3 (low), Kimi K2.6, Kimi K2.7 Code, Kimi K2.5, Kimi K2.6, and Kimi K2.5.

The most intelligent model available on Kimi is Kimi K3 (max) with an Intelligence Index score of 60.

The fastest model on Kimi by output speed is Kimi K2.5 at 58.2 tokens per second.

The model with the lowest time to first answer token on Kimi is Kimi K2.5 at 2.89s. Lower latency means faster initial response time.

The most affordable model on Kimi by blended price is Kimi K2.5 at $0.49 per 1M tokens (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio).

Prices on Kimi vary up to 5x across models, from $0.49 per 1M tokens for Kimi K2.5 to $2.31 per 1M tokens for Kimi K3 (low).

Yes, Kimi offers an OpenAI-compatible API, making it easy to switch from OpenAI or use existing OpenAI SDK integrations.

Yes, all 7 models on Kimi support JSON mode for structured output.

Yes, all 7 models on Kimi support function calling (tool use).

Yes, Kimi offers 5 reasoning models: Kimi K3 (max), Kimi K3 (low), Kimi K2.6, Kimi K2.7 Code, and Kimi K2.5. Reasoning models use extended thinking to work through complex problems before providing an answer.

Yes, all 7 models on Kimi are open weight models.

Yes, provider performance can vary over time due to infrastructure changes, load balancing, and updates. We continuously benchmark all providers and display historical performance trends in the "Over Time" charts.

When choosing a model on Kimi, consider: intelligence (for quality-sensitive tasks), output speed (for throughput-intensive tasks), latency (for interactive applications requiring quick first responses), pricing (for cost-sensitive workloads), and features like context window size, JSON mode, or function calling support.