FriendliAI: Models Intelligence, Performance & Price

FriendliAI
FriendliAI

This analysis is intended to support you in choosing the best model provided by FriendliAI for your use-case.

Most Intelligent

#1
GLM-5.3 (max)GLM-5.3 (max)
45
#2
GLM-5.3-FlashGLM-5.3-Flash
42
#3
GLM-5.2 (max)GLM-5.2 (max)
34
#4
GLM-5.1GLM-5.1
26
#5
GLM-5.1 (non-reasoning)GLM-5.1 (non-reasoning)
24

Intelligence index

Total 9 models

Fastest

#1
MiniMax-M2.5MiniMax-M2.5
182 t/s
#2
GLM-5.2 (max)GLM-5.2 (max)
157 t/s
#3
GLM-5.3 (max)GLM-5.3 (max)
155 t/s
#4
GLM-5.1GLM-5.1
143 t/s
#5
GLM-5.1 (non-reasoning)GLM-5.1 (non-reasoning)
142 t/s

Output speed

Total 9 models

Lowest Price

#1
GLM-5.3-FlashGLM-5.3-Flash
$0.10
#2
Gemma 4 31BGemma 4 31B
$0.17
#3
Gemma 4 31B (non-reasoning)Gemma 4 31B (non-reasoning)
$0.17
#4
MiniMax-M2.5MiniMax-M2.5
$0.22
#5
DeepSeek V3.2 (non-reasoning)DeepSeek V3.2 (non-reasoning)
$0.42

Blended price (per 1M tokens)

Total 9 models

FriendliAI offers 9 models, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across models.

  • For intelligence, the top models on FriendliAI are GLM-5.3 (max) (45), GLM-5.3-Flash (42), and GLM-5.2 (max) (34).
  • For output speed, the fastest models are MiniMax-M2.5 (182 t/s), GLM-5.2 (max) (157 t/s), and GLM-5.3 (max) (155 t/s).
  • For latency, GLM-5.1 (non-reasoning) (0.87s), Gemma 4 31B (non-reasoning) (0.91s), and DeepSeek V3.2 (non-reasoning) (1.09s) offer the lowest time to first answer token.
  • For pricing, GLM-5.3-Flash ($0.10), Gemma 4 31B ($0.17), and Gemma 4 31B (non-reasoning) ($0.17) offer the lowest blended prices per 1M tokens. Prices vary up to 4.2x across models.
  • For context window size, GLM-5.3 (max) (1M), GLM-5.3-Flash (1M), and GLM-5.2 (max) (1M) support the largest context windows on FriendliAI.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Output tokens per second · Higher is better
USD per 1M tokens (blended) · Lower is better

Intelligence Evaluations

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 incorporates 10 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, GDPval-AA v2.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1
Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better
See more

Agentic knowledge work, (Elo-500)/2000

Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000

Agentic SaaS workflows

Agentic coding & terminal use

SciCodeUnder review

Coding

Reasoning & knowledge

Professional document reasoning, All-pass

CritPtUnder review

Physics reasoning

Long context reasoning

Legal agentic work, Hallucination-Gated All-Pass Rate

Agentic business operations

Agentic scientific research workflows in a terminal

Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents

No data available

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

Visual reasoning

Medical long context reasoning

Intelligence Index vs. Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Context Window

Context Window

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better

Pricing

Intelligence Index vs. Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Performance Summary

Output Speed vs. Price

Output speed: output tokens per second · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Speed

Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Latency

Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token

Latency: Time To First Answer Token

Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time

Cache Behaviour

Cache Hit Rate

Share of cacheable input tokens served from cache · Median of the last four weeks, updated Sep 26, 2026

Cost per Task vs. Cache Hit Rate

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Cache hit rate: median of the last four weeks, updated Sep 26, 2026
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

End-to-End Response Time vs. Price

End-to-end response time: end-to-end seconds to output 500 tokens · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Further Analysis
Z AI logo
GLM-5.3 (max)
1M
Open
45
$1.81
167
1.15
16.14
11.99
Z AI logo
GLM-5.3-Flash
1M
Open
42
$0.51
128
1.51
21.00
15.59
Z AI logo
GLM-5.2 (max)
1M
Open
34
$0.87
153
0.84
17.14
13.04
Z AI logo
GLM-5.1
203k
Open
26
$0.75
131
0.84
33.52
28.88
Z AI logo
GLM-5.1 (non-reasoning)
203k
Open
24*
--
126
0.87
4.85
--
MiniMax logo
MiniMax-M2.5
197k
Open
23*
--
171
0.40
15.00
11.67
MiniMax logo
MiniMax-M2.1
197k
Open
21*
--
--
--
--
--
DeepSeek logo
DeepSeek V3.2 (non-reasoning)
164k
Open
16*
--
61
1.09
9.29
--
Google logo
Gemma 4 31B
256k
Open
15
$0.10
82
2.41
29.66
21.15
Google logo
Gemma 4 31B (non-reasoning)
262k
Open
14*
--
85
1.31
7.19
--

Key definitions

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about FriendliAI