Nebius: Models Intelligence, Performance & Price

Name: Intelligence
Creator: Artificial Analysis
License: https://artificialanalysis.ai/docs/legal/Terms-of-Use.pdf

Nebius

This analysis is intended to support you in choosing the best model provided by Nebius for your use-case.

Most Intelligent

GLM-5.3 (max) (FP4)

Kimi K3 (max)

GLM-5.3-Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max)

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max)

Intelligence index

Total 32 models

Fastest

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max)

351 t/s

MiniMax-M3 (FP8)

323 t/s

Nemotron 3 Ultra

314 t/s

gpt-oss-120b (low) Base

289 t/s

GLM-5.3 (max) (FP4)

276 t/s

Output speed

Total 32 models

Lowest Price

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (BF16)

$0.08

Nemotron 3 Nano

$0.08

Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 (non-reasoning)

$0.12

Gemma 3 27B (FP8)

$0.12

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max)

$0.15

Blended price (per 1M tokens)

Total 32 models

Nebius offers 32 models, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across models.

For intelligence, the top models on Nebius are GLM-5.3 (max) (FP4) (45), Kimi K3 (max) (44), and GLM-5.3-Flash (42).
For output speed, the fastest models are DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) (351 t/s), MiniMax-M3 (FP8) (323 t/s), and Nemotron 3 Ultra (314 t/s).
For latency, GLM-5.2 (non-reasoning) (FP4) (0.97s), Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 (non-reasoning) (1.11s), and DeepSeek V4 Pro (non-reasoning) (1.28s) offer the lowest time to first answer token.
For pricing, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (BF16) ($0.08), Nemotron 3 Nano ($0.08), and Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 (non-reasoning) ($0.12) offer the lowest blended prices per 1M tokens.
For context window size, MiniMax-M3 (FP8) (1M), Kimi K3 (max) (1M), and GLM-5.3-Flash (1M) support the largest context windows on Nebius.

Intelligence

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Price

USD per 1M tokens (blended) · Lower is better

Intelligence Evaluations

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 incorporates 10 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, GDPval-AA v2.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1

Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 includes: AA-Briefcase v1.1, GDPval-AA v2.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better

AA-Briefcase v1.1Updated

Agentic knowledge work, (Elo-500)/2000

GDPval-AA v2.1Updated

Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000

AutomationBench-AA

Agentic SaaS workflows

Terminal-Bench 4.0

Agentic coding & terminal use

SciCodeUnder review

Coding

Humanity's Last Exam

Reasoning & knowledge

GDP.pdf

Professional document reasoning, All-pass

CritPtUnder review

Physics reasoning

AA-Omniscience Accuracy

Knowledge

AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate

1 - hallucination rate

AA-LCR v1.1

Long context reasoning

Harvey LAB-AA

Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate

EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA

Agentic business operations

Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1New

Agentic scientific research workflows in a terminal

AA-AnalystAgent

Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents

ITBench-AA

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

MMMU-Pro

Visual reasoning

MLCR-AA

Medical long context reasoning

While model intelligence generally translates across use cases, specific evaluations may be more relevant for certain use cases.

Intelligence Index vs. Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended)

Most attractive quadrant

Pareto line

While higher intelligence models are typically more expensive, they do not all follow the same price-quality curve.

Context Window

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better

Larger context windows are relevant to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) LLM workflows which typically involve reasoning and information retrieval of large amounts of data.

Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).

Pricing

Intelligence Index vs. Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended)

Most attractive quadrant

Pareto line

While higher intelligence models are typically more expensive, they do not all follow the same price-quality curve.

Performance Summary

Output Speed vs. Price

Output speed: output tokens per second · USD per 1M tokens (blended)

Most attractive quadrant

Pareto line

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Price per token, shown in USD per million tokens. Price is a blend of cache hit, input, and output token prices using the selected ratio (default 7:2:1 cache-input-output).

Speed

Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available.

Latency

Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token

Latency: Time To First Answer Token

Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time

Time to first answer token received, in seconds, after API request sent. For reasoning models, this includes the 'thinking' time of the model before providing an answer. For models which do not support streaming, this represents time to receive the completion.

Cache Behaviour

Cache Hit Rate

Share of cacheable input tokens served from cache · Median of the last four weeks, updated Sep 26, 2026

The share of cacheable input tokens served from the provider's prompt cache, measured during multi-turn agentic coding sessions. We regularly measure each endpoint and report a representative rate based on recent measurements. Higher values mean more of the input is billed at the cheaper cache-hit price, where the provider offers one, which lowers the effective cost of agentic workloads. For further details, see our methodology page.

Cost per Task vs. Cache Hit Rate

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Cache hit rate: median of the last four weeks, updated Sep 26, 2026

Most attractive quadrant

Pareto line

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

End-to-End Response Time vs. Price

End-to-end response time: end-to-end seconds to output 500 tokens · USD per 1M tokens (blended)

Most attractive quadrant

Pareto line

Price per token, shown in USD per million tokens. Price is a blend of cache hit, input, and output token prices using the selected ratio (default 7:2:1 cache-input-output).


									Further Analysis
GLM-5.3 (max) (FP4)	1M	Open	45	$8.68	291	1.48	10.05	6.86	Model Provider
Kimi K3 (max)	1.05M	Open	44	$9.22	233	1.08	11.80	8.57	Model Provider
GLM-5.3-Flash	1.05M	Open	42	$1.19	135	1.63	20.12	14.79	Model Provider
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max)	1.05M	Open	39	$3.13	348	1.33	8.52	5.75	Model Provider
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max)	1.05M	Open	36	$8.43	174	2.04	16.41	11.50	Model Provider
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max)	1.05M	Open	34	$0.65	159	1.69	17.42	12.59	Model Provider
GLM-5.2 (max) (FP4)	432k	Open	34	$2.94	294	1.00	9.49	6.79	Model Provider
DeepSeek V4 Pro (max)	1M	Open	30	$9.70	164	1.28	30.93	26.62	Model Provider
DeepSeek V4 Pro (high)	1M	Open	30*	--	163	1.31	16.60	12.23	Model Provider
Kimi K3 (low)	1.05M	Open	30	$5.77	206	1.08	13.22	9.71	Model Provider
MiniMax-M3 (FP8)	1.05M	Open	29	$1.91	325	1.47	9.15	6.15	Model Provider
Kimi K2.6	262k	Open	27	$1.91	262	1.48	20.41	17.01	Model Provider
GLM-5.1 (FP8, Base)	200k	Open	26	$2.62	39	1.76	111.84	97.25	Model Provider
Kimi K2.7 Code (FP4)	256k	Open	26	$1.89	247	1.36	12.41	9.02	Model Provider
GLM-5.1 (non-reasoning) (FP8, Base)	200k	Open	24*	--	37	1.80	15.35	--	Model Provider
Kimi K2.6 (non-reasoning)	262k	Open	24*	--	274	1.49	3.32	--	Model Provider
Nemotron 3 Ultra	256k	Open	23	$1.16	317	2.03	10.79	7.18	Model Provider
GLM-5.2 (non-reasoning) (FP4)	432k	Open	22*	--	250	0.97	2.97	--	Model Provider
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (non-reasoning) (Base, FP4)	262k	Open	21*	--	140	1.62	5.19	--	Model Provider
DeepSeek V4 Pro (non-reasoning)	1.05M	Open	21*	--	161	1.28	4.37	--	Model Provider
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (non-reasoning)	1.05M	Open	20	$4.28	168	2.02	4.99	--	Model Provider
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Base, FP4)	262k	Open	18	$0.47	137	1.63	28.59	23.30	Model Provider
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (BF16)	1.05M	Open	13	$0.09	262	0.99	10.55	7.64	Model Provider
Nemotron 3 Super	256k	Open	13	$1.64	170	1.37	16.06	11.75	Model Provider
Qwen3 235B 2507	262k	Open	12*	--	62	1.38	9.40	--	Model Provider
gpt-oss-120b (high) (Base)	128k	Open	12	$0.11	281	0.97	9.88	7.12	Model Provider
gpt-oss-120b (low) Base	128k	Open	10*	--	289	0.95	9.62	6.93	Model Provider
Nemotron 3 Nano	262k	Open	9	$0.02	117	1.07	22.50	17.14	Model Provider
Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 (non-reasoning)	262k	Open	8*	--	43	1.11	12.75	--	Model Provider
Hermes 4 405B (FP8)	128k	Open	7*	--	42	2.42	61.70	47.43	Model Provider
Hermes 4 405B (non-reasoning) (FP8)	128k	Open	7*	--	41	2.32	14.54	--	Model Provider
Gemma 3 27B (FP8)	110k	Open	5	$0.20	36	2.20	16.06	--	Model Provider

Key definitions

Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Nebius

Nebius offers 32 models that we track: GLM-5.3 (max) (FP4), Kimi K3 (max), GLM-5.3-Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max), DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max), GLM-5.2 (max) (FP4), DeepSeek V4 Pro (max), DeepSeek V4 Pro (high), Kimi K3 (low), MiniMax-M3 (FP8), Kimi K2.6, GLM-5.1 (FP8, Base), Kimi K2.7 Code (FP4), GLM-5.1 (non-reasoning) (FP8, Base), Kimi K2.6 (non-reasoning), Nemotron 3 Ultra, GLM-5.2 (non-reasoning) (FP4), Qwen3.5 397B A17B (non-reasoning) (Base, FP4), DeepSeek V4 Pro (non-reasoning), DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (non-reasoning), Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Base, FP4), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (BF16), Nemotron 3 Super, Qwen3 235B 2507, gpt-oss-120b (high) (Base), gpt-oss-120b (low) Base, Nemotron 3 Nano, Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 (non-reasoning), Hermes 4 405B (FP8), Hermes 4 405B (non-reasoning) (FP8), and Gemma 3 27B (FP8).

The most intelligent model available on Nebius is GLM-5.3 (max) (FP4) with an Intelligence Index score of 45.

The fastest model on Nebius by output speed is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) at 351.4 tokens per second.

The model with the lowest time to first answer token on Nebius is GLM-5.2 (non-reasoning) (FP4) at 0.97s. Lower latency means faster initial response time.

The most affordable model on Nebius by blended price is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (BF16) at $0.08 per 1M tokens (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio).

Prices on Nebius vary up to 54x across models, from $0.08 per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (BF16) to $4.20 per 1M tokens for Kimi K3 (low).

Yes, Nebius offers an OpenAI-compatible API, making it easy to switch from OpenAI or use existing OpenAI SDK integrations.

Yes, all 32 models on Nebius support JSON mode for structured output.

Yes, all 32 models on Nebius support function calling (tool use).

Yes, Nebius offers 22 reasoning models: GLM-5.3 (max) (FP4), Kimi K3 (max), GLM-5.3-Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max), DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max), DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max), GLM-5.2 (max) (FP4), DeepSeek V4 Pro (max), DeepSeek V4 Pro (high), Kimi K3 (low), MiniMax-M3 (FP8), Kimi K2.6, GLM-5.1 (FP8, Base), Kimi K2.7 Code (FP4), Nemotron 3 Ultra, Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Base, FP4), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (BF16), Nemotron 3 Super, gpt-oss-120b (high) (Base), gpt-oss-120b (low) Base, Nemotron 3 Nano, and Hermes 4 405B (FP8). Reasoning models use extended thinking to work through complex problems before providing an answer.

Yes, all 32 models on Nebius are open weight models.

Yes, provider performance can vary over time due to infrastructure changes, load balancing, and updates. We continuously benchmark all providers and display historical performance trends in the "Over Time" charts.

When choosing a model on Nebius, consider: intelligence (for quality-sensitive tasks), output speed (for throughput-intensive tasks), latency (for interactive applications requiring quick first responses), pricing (for cost-sensitive workloads), and features like context window size, JSON mode, or function calling support.

Nebius: Models Intelligence, Performance & Price

Most Intelligent

Fastest

Lowest Price

Intelligence

Speed

Price

Intelligence Evaluations

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence Evaluation Relevance

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Intelligence Index vs. Price

Price-Quality Variance

Context Window

Context Window

Context Window for RAG

Context Window

Pricing

Intelligence Index vs. Price

Price-Quality Variance

Performance Summary

Output Speed vs. Price

Output Speed

Price

Speed

Output Speed

Output Speed

Model Performance Representation

Latency

Latency: Time To First Answer Token

Time to First Answer Token

Cache Behaviour

Cache Hit Rate

What Cache Hit Rate Shows

Cost per Task vs. Cache Hit Rate

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

End-to-End Response Time

End-to-End Response Time vs. Price

Price

Key definitions

Context Window

Frequently Asked Questions

What models does Nebius offer?

What is the most intelligent model on Nebius?

What is the fastest model on Nebius?

Which model has the lowest latency on Nebius?

What is the cheapest model on Nebius?

How much do prices vary across models on Nebius?

Is Nebius OpenAI compatible?

Does Nebius support JSON mode?

Does Nebius support function calling?

Does Nebius offer reasoning models?

Does Nebius offer open weight models?

Does Nebius's performance change over time?

How do I choose a model on Nebius?