This model is deprecated. We only continue performance benchmarking for the default 10k input token workload. Results for other workloads are historical and no longer updated.

Z AI has launched a newer release, GLM-5.1. We suggest considering it instead.

•
GLM-5
•

Open weights model

•

Released February 2026

GLM-5 (Reasoning) API Provider Benchmarking & Analysis

Model Comparison

This analysis is intended to support you in choosing the best API provider of GLM-5 (Reasoning) for your use-case.

Fastest

#1
DeepInfra (FP4)DeepInfra (FP4)
77.8 t/s
#2
Novita FP8Novita FP8
65.7 t/s

Output speed

Total 5 providers

Lowest Latency

#1
DeepInfra (FP4)DeepInfra (FP4)
40.97 s
#2
Novita FP8Novita FP8
49.18 s

Time to first answer token

Total 5 providers

Lowest Price

#1
DeepInfra (FP4)DeepInfra (FP4)
$0.41
#2
SiliconFlow (FP8)SiliconFlow (FP8)
$0.66
#3
FireworksFireworks
$0.66
#4
Novita FP8Novita FP8
$0.66
#5
CoreWeave (FP8)CoreWeave (FP8)
$1.22

Blended price (per 1M tokens)

Total 5 providers

GLM-5 is available through 5 API providers, each offering different performance characteristics and pricing. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across providers.

  • For output speed, the top providers are DeepInfra (FP4) (77.8 t/s) and Novita FP8 (65.7 t/s).
  • For latency, DeepInfra (FP4) (40.97s) and Novita FP8 (49.18s) offer the lowest time to first answer token.
  • For pricing, DeepInfra (FP4) (0.41), SiliconFlow (FP8) (0.66), and Fireworks (0.66) offer the lowest blended prices per 1M tokens. Prices vary up to 3.0x across providers.
  • DeepInfra (FP4) stands out as the overall leader, ranking first across all three categories: speed, latency, and pricing.
Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Seconds to first answer token received · Lower is better
USD per 1M tokens (blended) · Lower is better

Pricing

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output: GLM-5 (Reasoning)

Price (USD per M Tokens) · Lower is better · 10,000 input tokens

Cost per Intelligence Index Task: GLM-5 (Reasoning)

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better
No data available

Output Speed vs. Price: GLM-5 (Reasoning)

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · Output speed: output tokens per second · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant

Speed

Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)

Output Speed: GLM-5 (Reasoning)

Output speed: output tokens per second · 10,000 input tokens

Time per Intelligence Index Task: GLM-5 (Reasoning)

Weighted average decode time (minutes) per Intelligence Index task · Excludes TTFT and overhead time · Lower is better
No data available

Cost per Task vs. Time per Task: GLM-5 (Reasoning)

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Weighted average decode time (minutes) per Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
No data available

Latency

Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token

Time to First Answer Token: GLM-5 (Reasoning)

Seconds to first token received · Lower is better · 10,000 input tokens

Cache Behaviour

Cache Hit Rate: GLM-5 (Reasoning)

Share of cacheable input tokens served from cache · Median of the last four weeks, updated Oct 26, 2026

Cost per Task vs. Cache Hit Rate: GLM-5 (Reasoning)

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Cache hit rate: median of the last four weeks, updated Oct 26, 2026
Most attractive quadrant
No data available

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

End-to-End Response Time: GLM-5 (Reasoning)

Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better · 10,000 input tokens

Key Comparison Metrics & API Features

CoreWeave logoCoreWeave
200k
Open
--
--
--
--
--
DeepInfra logoDeepInfra
203k
Open
--
79
1.21
46.91
39.36
Fireworks logoFireworks
203k
Open
--
--
--
--
--
Novita logoNovita
203k
Open
--
70
2.19
53.67
44.35
SiliconFlow logoSiliconFlow
200k
Open
--
--
--
--
--

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about GLM-5 (Reasoning) providers