This model is deprecated. We only continue performance benchmarking for the default 10k input token workload. Results for other workloads are historical and no longer updated.

Z AI has launched a newer release, GLM-5.3. We suggest considering it instead.

•
GLM-5.2
•

Open weights model

•

Released June 2026

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) API Provider Benchmarking & Analysis

Model Comparison

This analysis is intended to support you in choosing the best API provider of GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) for your use-case.

Fastest

#1
Baseten (FAST)Baseten (FAST)
338.2 t/s
#2
DatabricksDatabricks
224.0 t/s
#3
Nebius (FP4)Nebius (FP4)
220.2 t/s
#4
ScalewayScaleway
115.6 t/s
#5
BasetenBaseten
109.8 t/s

Output speed

Total 7 providers

Lowest Latency

#1
Baseten (FAST)Baseten (FAST)
0.53 s
#2
DatabricksDatabricks
0.91 s
#3
Nebius (FP4)Nebius (FP4)
1.01 s
#4
ScalewayScaleway
1.16 s
#5
SiliconFlow (FP8)SiliconFlow (FP8)
1.52 s

Time to first token

Total 7 providers

Lowest Price

#1
Bitdeer AIBitdeer AI
$0.37
#2
BasetenBaseten
$0.82
#3
SiliconFlow (FP8)SiliconFlow (FP8)
$0.85
#4
DatabricksDatabricks
$0.90
#5
Baseten (FAST)Baseten (FAST)
$1.23

Blended price (per 1M tokens)

Total 7 providers

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) is available through 7 API providers, each offering different performance characteristics and pricing. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across providers.

  • For output speed, the top providers are Baseten (FAST) (338.2 t/s), Databricks (224.0 t/s), and Nebius (FP4) (220.2 t/s). Speed varies significantly across providers, with a 391% difference between the fastest and slowest.
  • For latency, Baseten (FAST) (0.53s), Databricks (0.91s), and Nebius (FP4) (1.01s) offer the lowest time to first token.
  • For pricing, Bitdeer AI (0.37), Baseten (0.82), and SiliconFlow (FP8) (0.85) offer the lowest blended prices per 1M tokens. Prices vary up to 6.8x across providers.
  • Baseten (FAST) offers the best performance with both the highest speed and lowest latency. For cost optimization, Bitdeer AI provides the most competitive pricing.

Highlights

Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Seconds to first answer token received · Lower is better
USD per 1M tokens (blended) · Lower is better

Pricing

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Price (USD per M Tokens) · Lower is better · 10,000 input tokens

Pricing: Blended Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended) · Lower is better

Pricing: Cache Discount

1 - (cache hit price / input price) · Higher is better

Output Speed vs. Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · Output speed: output tokens per second · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Speed

Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)

Output Speed: GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)

Output speed: output tokens per second · 10,000 input tokens

Latency vs. Output Speed

Latency: seconds to first token received · Output speed: output tokens per second · 10,000 input tokens
Most attractive quadrant

Latency

Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token

Time to First Token

Seconds to first token received · Lower is better · 10,000 input tokens

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better · 10,000 input tokens

Key Comparison Metrics & API Features

Baseten logoBaseten
524k
Open
--
338
0.53
2.01
--
Nebius logoNebius
432k
Open
--
220
1.01
3.28
--
Scaleway logoScaleway
262k
Open
--
116
1.16
5.48
--
Bitdeer AI logoBitdeer AI
1M
Open
--
--
--
--
--
SiliconFlow logoSiliconFlow
1.05M
Open
--
69
1.52
8.78
--
Baseten logoBaseten
1.05M
Open
--
110
2.21
6.77
--
Databricks logoDatabricks
1M
Open
--
224
0.91
3.14
--

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) providers