Inception: Models Intelligence, Performance & Price

Inception
Inception

This analysis is intended to support you in choosing the best model provided by Inception for your use-case.

Most Intelligent

#1
Mercury 2.5Mercury 2.5
12
#2
Mercury 2Mercury 2
11

Intelligence Index

Total 2 models

Fastest

#1
Mercury 2.5Mercury 2.5
689 t/s
#2
Mercury 2Mercury 2
451 t/s

Output speed

Total 2 models

Lowest Price

#1
Mercury 2.5Mercury 2.5
$0.14
#2
Mercury 2Mercury 2
$0.14

Blended price (per 1M tokens)

Total 2 models

Inception offers 2 models, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across models.

  • For intelligence, the top models on Inception are Mercury 2.5 (12) and Mercury 2 (11).
  • For output speed, the fastest models are Mercury 2.5 (689 t/s) and Mercury 2 (451 t/s).
  • For latency, Mercury 2.5 (3.71s) and Mercury 2 (7.79s) offer the lowest time to first answer token.
  • For pricing, Mercury 2.5 ($0.14) and Mercury 2 ($0.14) offer the lowest blended prices per 1M tokens.
  • For context window size, Mercury 2.5 (256k) and Mercury 2 (128k) support the largest context windows on Inception.
  • Mercury 2.5 stands out as the overall leader on Inception, ranking first across intelligence, speed, and pricing.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Output tokens per second · Higher is better
USD per 1M tokens (blended) · Lower is better

Intelligence Evaluations

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 incorporates 10 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, GDPval-AA v2.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1

Evaluations

Evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · AA-PersonalityBench scores are percentile ranks from 1 to 100
See more

Agentic knowledge work, Elo

Agentic SaaS workflows

Agentic real-world work tasks, Elo

Reasoning & knowledge

Professional document reasoning, All-pass

Agentic coding & terminal use

Long context reasoning

SciCodeUnder review

Coding

Physics reasoning

Agentic scientific research workflows in a terminal

No data available

Agentic software engineering in open-source repositories

No data available

Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents

No data available

Legal agentic work, Hallucination-Gated All-Pass Rate

No data available

Agentic business operations

No data available

Agentic interactive 3D experiences, Elo

No data available

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

No data available
MLCR-AAUpdated

Medical long context reasoning

No data available

Visual reasoning

No data available

Rich, varied, well-crafted language

No data available

Well-structured, scannable, answer-first

No data available

Truthful, acknowledges uncertainty, non-sycophantic

No data available

Use of filler and generic language

No data available

Intelligence Index vs. Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant

Context Window

Context Window

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better

Pricing

Intelligence Index vs. Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant

Performance Summary

Output Speed vs. Price

Output speed: output tokens per second · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant

Speed

Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Latency

Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token

Latency: Time To First Answer Token

Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time

Cache Behaviour

Cache Hit Rate

Share of cacheable input tokens served from cache · Median of the last four weeks, updated Sep 26, 2026

Cost per Task vs. Cache Hit Rate

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Cache hit rate: median of the last four weeks, updated Sep 26, 2026
Most attractive quadrant

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

End-to-End Response Time vs. Price

End-to-end response time: end-to-end seconds to output 500 tokens · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant

Further Analysis
Inception logo
Mercury 2.5
256k
Proprietary
12
$0.12
742
3.59
4.26
--
Inception logo
Mercury 2
128k
Proprietary
11
$0.04
443
7.79
8.92
--

Key definitions

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Inception