Inception: Models Intelligence, Performance & Price

Inception
Inception

This analysis is intended to support you in choosing the best model provided by Inception for your use-case.

Most Intelligent

Updated
#1
Mercury 2Mercury 2
14
#2
Mercury 2.5Mercury 2.5
12

Intelligence index

Total 2 models

Fastest

#1
Mercury 2Mercury 2
764 t/s
#2
Mercury 2.5Mercury 2.5
697 t/s

Output speed

Total 2 models

Lowest Price

#1
Mercury 2Mercury 2
$0.14
#2
Mercury 2.5Mercury 2.5
$0.14

Blended price (per 1M tokens)

Total 2 models

Inception offers 2 models, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across models.

  • For intelligence, the top models on Inception are Mercury 2 (14) and Mercury 2.5 (12).
  • For output speed, the fastest models are Mercury 2 (764 t/s) and Mercury 2.5 (697 t/s).
  • For latency, Mercury 2.5 (3.59s) and Mercury 2 (4.68s) offer the lowest time to first answer token.
  • For pricing, Mercury 2 ($0.14) and Mercury 2.5 ($0.14) offer the lowest blended prices per 1M tokens.
  • For context window size, Mercury 2.5 (256k) and Mercury 2 (128k) support the largest context windows on Inception.
  • Mercury 2 stands out as the overall leader on Inception, ranking first across intelligence, speed, and pricing.
Updated
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Output tokens per second · Higher is better
USD per 1M tokens (blended) · Lower is better

Intelligence Evaluations

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 incorporates 10 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, GDPval-AA v2.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1
Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better
See more

Agentic knowledge work, (Elo-500)/2000

Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000

Agentic SaaS workflows

Agentic coding & terminal use

SciCodeUnder review

Coding

Reasoning & knowledge

Professional document reasoning, All-pass

CritPtUnder review

Physics reasoning

Long context reasoning

Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate

No data available

Agentic business operations

No data available

Agentic scientific research workflows in a terminal

No data available

Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents

No data available

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

No data available

Visual reasoning

No data available

Medical long context reasoning

No data available

Intelligence Index vs. Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant

Context Window

Context Window

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better

Pricing

Intelligence Index vs. Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant

Performance Summary

Output Speed vs. Price

Output speed: output tokens per second · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant

Speed

Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Latency

Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token

Latency: Time To First Answer Token

Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

End-to-End Response Time vs. Price

End-to-end response time: end-to-end seconds to output 500 tokens · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant

Further Analysis
Inception logo
Mercury 2
128k
Proprietary
14*
--
846
4.54
5.13
--
Inception logo
Mercury 2.5
256k
Proprietary
12
$0.12
637
3.36
4.15
--

Key definitions

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Inception