Gemini Experimental (Nov '24): Quality, Performance & Price Analysis
Analysis of Google's Gemini Experimental (Nov '24) and comparison to other AI models across key metrics including quality, price, performance (tokens per second & time to first token), context window & more. Click on any model to compare API providers for that model. For more details including relating to our methodology, see our FAQs.
Comparison Summary
Quality:Price:Speed:
Gemini Experimental (Nov) is slower compared to average, with a output speed of 40.8 tokens per second.
Latency:Gemini Experimental (Nov) has a higher latency compared to average, taking 2.64s to receive the first token (TTFT).
Context Window:Gemini Experimental (Nov) has a smaller context windows than average, with a context window of 33k tokens.
Highlights
Quality
Artificial Analysis Quality Index; Higher is better
Speed
Output Tokens per Second; Higher is better
Price
USD per 1M Tokens; Lower is better
Parallel Queries:
Prompt Length:
Further details