DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) API Provider Benchmarking & Analysis
This analysis is intended to support you in choosing the best API provider of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) for your use-case.
Fastest
Systalyze
Nebius
DeepSeek
DigitalOceanOutput speed
Total 4 providers
Lowest Latency
DigitalOceanSystalyzeDeepSeekNebiusTime to first token
Total 4 providers
Lowest Price
SystalyzeDeepSeekDigitalOceanNebiusBlended price (per 1M tokens)
Total 4 providers
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (non-reasoning) is available through 4 API providers, each offering different performance characteristics and pricing. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across providers.
- For output speed, the top providers are Systalyze (258.2 t/s), Nebius (142.3 t/s), and DeepSeek (85.0 t/s). Speed varies significantly across providers, with a 396% difference between the fastest and slowest.
- For latency, DigitalOcean (0.84s), Systalyze (1.57s), and DeepSeek (1.67s) offer the lowest time to first token.
- For pricing, Systalyze (0.33), DeepSeek (0.69), and DigitalOcean (0.69) offer the lowest blended prices per 1M tokens. Prices vary up to 4.8x across providers.
- Systalyze provides an excellent balance of speed and cost-effectiveness. For the lowest latency, DigitalOcean is the best choice.
Update: Default performance benchmarking workload has updated to 10k input tokens to better reflect production use cases. You can still select different workloads above.
Pricing
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Output Speed vs. Price
Speed
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Cost per Task vs. Time per Task
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Time to First Token
Cache Behaviour
Cache Hit Rate
Cost per Task vs. Cache Hit Rate
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
Key Comparison Metrics & API Features
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) providers
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is available through 4 API providers: Systalyze, DeepSeek, Nebius, and DigitalOcean. Each provider offers different performance characteristics and pricing.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is currently available through 4 API providers that we benchmark and track.
The providers with the lowest time to first token for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) are DigitalOcean (0.84s), Systalyze (1.57s), and DeepSeek (1.67s). Lower latency means faster initial response time.
The most affordable providers for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by blended price are Systalyze ($0.33 per 1M tokens), DeepSeek ($0.69 per 1M tokens), and DigitalOcean ($0.69 per 1M tokens). Blended price uses a 7:2:1 cache hit/input/output token ratio.
Output speed for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) varies significantly across providers. Systalyze is the fastest at 258.2 t/s, which is 5.0x faster than DigitalOcean at 52.1 t/s.
All 4 providers of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) support JSON mode for structured output.
All 4 providers of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) support function calling (tool use).
The best provider for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) depends on your priorities: Systalyze offers the highest output speed, DigitalOcean has the lowest latency, and Systalyze provides the most competitive pricing.
When choosing a provider for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning), consider: output speed (for throughput-intensive tasks), latency (for interactive applications requiring quick first responses), pricing (for cost-sensitive workloads), and API features like JSON mode or function calling.
Yes, provider performance can vary over time due to infrastructure changes, load balancing, and updates. We continuously benchmark all providers and display historical performance trends in the "Over Time" charts.
For information about DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)'s intelligence, capabilities, modalities, and how it compares to other models, see the model overview page. View model overview