Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs. GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)
Comparison between Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) across intelligence, price, speed, context window and more.
For details relating to our methodology, see our Methodology page.
Highlights
Model Comparison
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 58 | 35 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is more intelligent than GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) |
| Price per 1M Tokens | $1.18 | $0.90 | GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) is cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
| Context Window | 984k tokens~1,475 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | 1000k tokens~1,500 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) has a larger context window than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
| Release Date | August 2026 | June 2026 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has a more recent release date than GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) |
| Parameters | 2400B, 95B active at inference time | 753B, 40B active at inference time | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has more parameters than GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has reasoning while GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) does not |
| Image Input Support | No | No | Neither Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B nor GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) have image input support |
| Open Source (Weights) | Both Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) are open source | ||
| License | |||
| License Supports Commercial Use Without Restrictions | No | Yes | GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) has license supports commercial use without restrictions while Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B does not |
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Intelligence Evaluations
Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000
Agentic tool use
Agentic coding & terminal use
Coding
Reasoning & knowledge
Scientific reasoning
Physics reasoning
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Long context reasoning
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Agentic SaaS workflows
Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate
Agentic business operations
Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents
Instruction following
Long-horizon agentic tasks
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Visual reasoning
AA-Briefcase
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Omniscience
AA-Omniscience Index
Openness Index
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Intelligence Index Comparisons
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Token Use
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Context Window
Context Window
Speed
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
Model Size (Open Weights Models Only)
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
Frequently Asked Questions
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is more intelligent. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B scores 58, compared with GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) at 35 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) is cheaper. GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) costs $0.90 per 1M tokens, compared with Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at $1.18 per 1M tokens (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio).
GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) has a larger context window. GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) supports 1.0M tokens, compared with Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at 980k tokens.