Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs. Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
Comparison between Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) across intelligence, price, speed, context window and more.
For details relating to our methodology, see our Methodology page.
Highlights
Model Comparison
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 58 | 43 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is more intelligent than Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) |
| Price per 1M Tokens | $1.18 | $1.54 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) |
| Context Window | 984k tokens~1,475 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | 1000k tokens~1,500 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) has a larger context window than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
| Release Date | August 2026 | June 2026 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has a more recent release date than Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has reasoning while Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) does not |
| Image Input Support | No | Yes | Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) has image input support while Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B does not |
| Open Source (Weights) | No | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is open source while Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) is proprietary |
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Intelligence Evaluations
Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000
Agentic tool use
Agentic coding & terminal use
Coding
Reasoning & knowledge
Scientific reasoning
Physics reasoning
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Long context reasoning
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Agentic SaaS workflows
Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate
Agentic business operations
Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents
Instruction following
Long-horizon agentic tasks
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Visual reasoning
AA-Briefcase
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Omniscience
AA-Omniscience Index
Openness Index
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Intelligence Index Comparisons
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Token Use
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Context Window
Context Window
Speed
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
Model Size (Open Weights Models Only)
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
Frequently Asked Questions
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is more intelligent. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B scores 58, compared with Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) at 43 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is cheaper. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B costs $1.18 per 1M tokens, compared with Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) at $1.54 per 1M tokens (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio).
Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) has a larger context window. Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) supports 1.0M tokens, compared with Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at 980k tokens.