Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) vs. MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning)
Comparison between Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) and MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) across intelligence, price, speed, context window and more.
For details relating to our methodology, see our Methodology page.
Highlights
Model Comparison
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) | MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 26 | 32* | MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) is more intelligent than Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) |
| Price per 1M Tokens | $0.26 | $0.12 | MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) is cheaper than Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) |
| Context Window | 1000k tokens~1,500 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | 256k tokens~384 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) has a larger context window than MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) |
| Release Date | March 2026 | December 2025 | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) has a more recent release date than MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) |
| Parameters | 120.6B, 12.7B active at inference time | 309B, 15B active at inference time | MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) has more parameters than Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Both Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) and MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) have reasoning |
| Image Input Support | No | No | Neither Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) nor MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) have image input support |
| Open Source (Weights) | Both Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) and MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) are open source | ||
| License | |||
| License Supports Commercial Use Without Restrictions | Yes | Yes | Both Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) and MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) have license supports commercial use without restrictions |
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Intelligence Evaluations
Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000
Agentic tool use
Agentic coding & terminal use
Coding
Reasoning & knowledge
Scientific reasoning
Physics reasoning
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Long context reasoning
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Agentic SaaS workflows
Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate
Agentic business operations
Instruction following
Long-horizon agentic tasks
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Visual reasoning
AA-Briefcase
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Omniscience
AA-Omniscience Index
Openness Index
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Intelligence Index Comparisons
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Token Use
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Context Window
Context Window
Speed
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
Model Size (Open Weights Models Only)
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
Frequently Asked Questions
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) is more intelligent. MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) scores 32 (estimated), compared with Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) at 26 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) is cheaper. MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) costs $0.12 per 1M tokens, compared with Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) at $0.26 per 1M tokens (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio).
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) has a larger context window. Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) supports 1.0M tokens, compared with MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) at 260k tokens.