Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) vs. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
Comparison between Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) and Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) across intelligence, price, speed, context window and more.
For details relating to our methodology, see our Methodology page.
Highlights
Model Comparison
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 51 | 38 | Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) is more intelligent than Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) |
| Price per 1M Tokens | $0.78 | $0.58 | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) is cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) |
| Output Speed | 127 tokens/s | 188 tokens/s | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) is faster than Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) |
| Time to First Token | 2.47s | 1.24s | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) responds faster than Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) |
| Context Window | 1049k tokens~1,573 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | 262k tokens~393 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) has a larger context window than Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) |
| Release Date | July 2026 | June 2026 | Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) has a more recent release date than Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Both Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) and Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) have reasoning |
| Image Input Support | Yes | No | Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) has image input support while Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) does not |
| Open Source (Weights) | No | Yes | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) is open source while Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) is proprietary |
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Intelligence Evaluations
Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000
Agentic tool use
Agentic coding & terminal use
Coding
Reasoning & knowledge
Scientific reasoning
Physics reasoning
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Long context reasoning
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Agentic SaaS workflows
Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate
Agentic business operations
Instruction following
Long-horizon agentic tasks
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Visual reasoning
AA-Briefcase
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Omniscience
AA-Omniscience Index
Openness Index
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Intelligence Index Comparisons
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Token Use
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Context Window
Context Window
Speed
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
Model Size (Open Weights Models Only)
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
Frequently Asked Questions
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) is more intelligent. Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) scores 51, compared with Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) at 38 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) is faster. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) generates 188.1 tokens per second, compared with Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) at 127.3 tokens per second.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) is cheaper. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) costs $0.58 per 1M tokens, compared with Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) at $0.78 per 1M tokens (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio).
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) has lower latency. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) has a time to first token of 1.24s, compared with Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) at 2.47s.
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) has a larger context window. Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) supports 1.0M tokens, compared with Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) at 260k tokens.