Muse Glimmer (high) vs. Kimi K2.7 Code
Comparison between Muse Glimmer (high) and Kimi K2.7 Code across intelligence, price, speed, context window and more.
For details relating to our methodology, see our Methodology page.
Highlights
Model Comparison
Muse Glimmer (high) | Kimi K2.7 Code | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 35 | 43 | Kimi K2.7 Code is more intelligent than Muse Glimmer (high) |
| Price per 1M Tokens | $0.23 | $0.72 | Muse Glimmer (high) is cheaper than Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Output Speed | 101 tokens/s | 39 tokens/s | Muse Glimmer (high) is faster than Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Time to First Token | 0.88s | 2.83s | Muse Glimmer (high) responds faster than Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Context Window | 256k tokens~384 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | 256k tokens~384 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | Both Muse Glimmer (high) and Kimi K2.7 Code have the same sized context window |
| Release Date | August 2026 | June 2026 | Muse Glimmer (high) has a more recent release date than Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Parameters | 30B | 1000B, 32B active at inference time | Kimi K2.7 Code has more parameters than Muse Glimmer (high) |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Both Muse Glimmer (high) and Kimi K2.7 Code have reasoning |
| Image Input Support | Yes | Yes | Both Muse Glimmer (high) and Kimi K2.7 Code have image input support |
| Open Source (Weights) | Both Muse Glimmer (high) and Kimi K2.7 Code are open source | ||
| License | |||
| License Supports Commercial Use Without Restrictions | Yes | Yes | Both Muse Glimmer (high) and Kimi K2.7 Code have license supports commercial use without restrictions |
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Intelligence Evaluations
Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000
Agentic tool use
Agentic coding & terminal use
Coding
Reasoning & knowledge
Scientific reasoning
Physics reasoning
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Long context reasoning
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Agentic SaaS workflows
Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate
Agentic business operations
Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents
Instruction following
Long-horizon agentic tasks
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Visual reasoning
AA-Briefcase
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Omniscience
AA-Omniscience Index
Openness Index
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Intelligence Index Comparisons
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Token Use
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Context Window
Context Window
Speed
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
Model Size (Open Weights Models Only)
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
Frequently Asked Questions
Kimi K2.7 Code is more intelligent. Kimi K2.7 Code scores 43, compared with Muse Glimmer (high) at 35 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
Muse Glimmer (high) is faster. Muse Glimmer (high) generates 100.8 tokens per second, compared with Kimi K2.7 Code at 39.0 tokens per second.
Muse Glimmer (high) is cheaper. Muse Glimmer (high) costs $0.23 per 1M tokens, compared with Kimi K2.7 Code at $0.72 per 1M tokens (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio).
Muse Glimmer (high) has lower latency. Muse Glimmer (high) has a time to first token of 0.88s, compared with Kimi K2.7 Code at 2.83s.
Both models have a context window of 260k tokens.