MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs. Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Comparison between MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) across intelligence, price, speed, context window and more.
For details relating to our methodology, see our Methodology page.
Highlights
Model Comparison
MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 42 | 32 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro is more intelligent than Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) |
| Price per 1M Tokens | $0.18 | $0.68 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper than Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) |
| Output Speed | 49 tokens/s | 136 tokens/s | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is faster than MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Time to First Token | 2.94s | 2.37s | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) responds faster than MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Context Window | 1000k tokens~1,500 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | 262k tokens~393 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | MiMo-V2.5-Pro has a larger context window than Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) |
| Release Date | April 2026 | February 2026 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro has a more recent release date than Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) |
| Parameters | 1023B, 42B active at inference time | 125B, 10B active at inference time | MiMo-V2.5-Pro has more parameters than Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Both MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) have reasoning |
| Image Input Support | No | Yes | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) has image input support while MiMo-V2.5-Pro does not |
| Open Source (Weights) | Both MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) are open source | ||
| License | |||
| License Supports Commercial Use Without Restrictions | Yes | Yes | Both MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) have license supports commercial use without restrictions |
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Intelligence Evaluations
Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000
Agentic tool use
Agentic coding & terminal use
Coding
Reasoning & knowledge
Scientific reasoning
Physics reasoning
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Long context reasoning
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Agentic SaaS workflows
Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate
Agentic business operations
Instruction following
Long-horizon agentic tasks
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Visual reasoning
AA-Briefcase
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Omniscience
AA-Omniscience Index
Openness Index
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Intelligence Index Comparisons
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Token Use
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Context Window
Context Window
Speed
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
Model Size (Open Weights Models Only)
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
Frequently Asked Questions
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is more intelligent. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores 42, compared with Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) at 32 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is faster. Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) generates 136.4 tokens per second, compared with MiMo-V2.5-Pro at 49.4 tokens per second.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper. MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.18 per 1M tokens, compared with Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) at $0.68 per 1M tokens (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio).
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) has lower latency. Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) has a time to first token of 2.37s, compared with MiMo-V2.5-Pro at 2.94s.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has a larger context window. MiMo-V2.5-Pro supports 1.0M tokens, compared with Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) at 260k tokens.