LongCat 2.0 vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Comparison between LongCat 2.0 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro across intelligence, price, speed, context window and more.
For details relating to our methodology, see our Methodology page.
Highlights
Model Comparison
LongCat 2.0 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 33 | 42 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro is more intelligent than LongCat 2.0 |
| Price per 1M Tokens | $0.46 | $0.18 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper than LongCat 2.0 |
| Output Speed | 41 tokens/s | 71 tokens/s | MiMo-V2.5-Pro is faster than LongCat 2.0 |
| Time to First Token | 2.87s | 2.75s | MiMo-V2.5-Pro responds faster than LongCat 2.0 |
| Context Window | 1000k tokens~1,500 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | 1000k tokens~1,500 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | Both LongCat 2.0 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro have the same sized context window |
| Release Date | June 2026 | April 2026 | LongCat 2.0 has a more recent release date than MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Parameters | 1600B, 48B active at inference time | 1023B, 42B active at inference time | LongCat 2.0 has more parameters than MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Both LongCat 2.0 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro have reasoning |
| Image Input Support | No | No | Neither LongCat 2.0 nor MiMo-V2.5-Pro have image input support |
| Open Source (Weights) | Both LongCat 2.0 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro are open source | ||
| License | |||
| License Supports Commercial Use Without Restrictions | Yes | Yes | Both LongCat 2.0 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro have license supports commercial use without restrictions |
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Intelligence Evaluations
Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000
Agentic tool use
Agentic coding & terminal use
Coding
Reasoning & knowledge
Scientific reasoning
Physics reasoning
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Long context reasoning
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Agentic SaaS workflows
Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate
Agentic business operations
Instruction following
Long-horizon agentic tasks
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Visual reasoning
AA-Briefcase
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Omniscience
AA-Omniscience Index
Openness
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Intelligence Index Comparisons
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Token Use
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
Price and Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Context Window
Context Window
Speed
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
Model Size (Open Weights Models Only)
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
Frequently Asked Questions
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is more intelligent. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores 42, compared with LongCat 2.0 at 33 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is faster. MiMo-V2.5-Pro generates 70.8 tokens per second, compared with LongCat 2.0 at 41.4 tokens per second.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper. MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.18 per 1M tokens, compared with LongCat 2.0 at $0.46 per 1M tokens (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio).
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has lower latency. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has a time to first token of 2.75s, compared with LongCat 2.0 at 2.87s.
Both models have a context window of 1.0M tokens.