HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) vs. Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B
Comparison between HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) and Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B across intelligence, price, speed, context window and more.
For details relating to our methodology, see our Methodology page.
Highlights
Model Comparison
HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) | Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 17* | 4* | HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) is more intelligent than Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B |
| Context Window | 128k tokens~192 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | 128k tokens~192 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | Both HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) and Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B have the same sized context window |
| Release Date | December 2025 | September 2024 | HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) has a more recent release date than Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B |
| Parameters | 32B | 3B | HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) has more parameters than Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) has reasoning while Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B does not |
| Image Input Support | Yes | No | HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) has image input support while Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B does not |
| Open Source (Weights) | Both HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) and Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B are open source | ||
| License | |||
| License Supports Commercial Use Without Restrictions | Yes | Yes | Both HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) and Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B have license supports commercial use without restrictions |
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Intelligence Evaluations
Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000
Agentic tool use
Agentic coding & terminal use
Coding
Reasoning & knowledge
Scientific reasoning
Physics reasoning
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Long context reasoning
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Agentic SaaS workflows
Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate
Agentic business operations
Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents
Instruction following
Long-horizon agentic tasks
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Visual reasoning
AA-Briefcase
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Omniscience
AA-Omniscience Index
Openness Index
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Intelligence Index Comparisons
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Token Use
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Context Window
Context Window
Speed
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
Model Size (Open Weights Models Only)
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
Frequently Asked Questions
HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) is more intelligent. HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) scores 17 (estimated), compared with Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B at 4 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
Both models have a context window of 130k tokens.