GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) vs. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium)
Comparison between GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) across intelligence, price, speed, context window and more.
For details relating to our methodology, see our Methodology page.
Highlights
Model Comparison
GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 40* | 22 | GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) is more intelligent than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) |
| Price per 1M Tokens | $1.87 | $1.47 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) is cheaper than GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) |
| Output Speed | 175 tokens/s | 115 tokens/s | GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) is faster than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) |
| Time to First Token | 89.40s | 14.76s | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) responds faster than GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) |
| Context Window | 400k tokens~600 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | 256k tokens~384 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) has a larger context window than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) |
| Release Date | December 2025 | November 2025 | GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) has a more recent release date than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Both GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) have reasoning |
| Image Input Support | Yes | Yes | Both GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) have image input support |
| Open Source (Weights) | No | No | Both GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) are proprietary |
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Intelligence Evaluations
Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000
Agentic tool use
Agentic coding & terminal use
Coding
Reasoning & knowledge
Scientific reasoning
Physics reasoning
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Long context reasoning
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Agentic SaaS workflows
Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate
Agentic business operations
Instruction following
Long-horizon agentic tasks
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Visual reasoning
AA-Briefcase
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Omniscience
AA-Omniscience Index
Openness
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Intelligence Index Comparisons
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Token Use
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
Price and Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Context Window
Context Window
Speed
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
Model Size (Open Weights Models Only)
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
Frequently Asked Questions
GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) is more intelligent. GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) scores 40 (estimated), compared with Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) at 22 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) is faster. GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) generates 175.4 tokens per second, compared with Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) at 115.4 tokens per second.
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) is cheaper. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) costs $1.47 per 1M tokens, compared with GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) at $1.87 per 1M tokens (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio).
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) has lower latency. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) has a time to first token of 14.76s, compared with GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) at 89.40s.
GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) has a larger context window. GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) supports 400k tokens, compared with Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) at 260k tokens.