GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs. Grok Build 0.1 0616
Comparison between GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) and Grok Build 0.1 0616 across intelligence, price, speed, context window and more.
For details relating to our methodology, see our Methodology page.
Highlights
Model Comparison
GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) | Grok Build 0.1 0616 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 34 | 40 | Grok Build 0.1 0616 is more intelligent than GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) |
| Price per 1M Tokens | $1.28 | $0.54 | Grok Build 0.1 0616 is cheaper than GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) |
| Output Speed | 60 tokens/s | 106 tokens/s | Grok Build 0.1 0616 is faster than GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) |
| Time to First Token | 1.96s | 0.54s | Grok Build 0.1 0616 responds faster than GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) |
| Context Window | 1000k tokens~1,500 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | 256k tokens~384 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) has a larger context window than Grok Build 0.1 0616 |
| Release Date | June 2026 | June 2026 | Both GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) and Grok Build 0.1 0616 have the same release date |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | Grok Build 0.1 0616 has reasoning while GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) does not |
| Image Input Support | No | Yes | Grok Build 0.1 0616 has image input support while GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) does not |
| Open Source (Weights) | No | GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) is open source while Grok Build 0.1 0616 is proprietary |
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Intelligence Evaluations
Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000
Agentic tool use
Agentic coding & terminal use
Coding
Reasoning & knowledge
Scientific reasoning
Physics reasoning
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Long context reasoning
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Agentic SaaS workflows
Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate
Agentic business operations
Instruction following
Long-horizon agentic tasks
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Visual reasoning
AA-Briefcase
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Omniscience
AA-Omniscience Index
Openness Index
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Intelligence Index Comparisons
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Token Use
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Context Window
Context Window
Speed
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
Model Size (Open Weights Models Only)
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
Frequently Asked Questions
Grok Build 0.1 0616 is more intelligent. Grok Build 0.1 0616 scores 40, compared with GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) at 34 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
Grok Build 0.1 0616 is faster. Grok Build 0.1 0616 generates 106.0 tokens per second, compared with GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) at 60.1 tokens per second.
Grok Build 0.1 0616 is cheaper. Grok Build 0.1 0616 costs $0.54 per 1M tokens, compared with GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) at $1.28 per 1M tokens (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio).
Grok Build 0.1 0616 has lower latency. Grok Build 0.1 0616 has a time to first token of 0.54s, compared with GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) at 1.96s.
GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) has a larger context window. GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) supports 1.0M tokens, compared with Grok Build 0.1 0616 at 260k tokens.