GLM-4.5-Air vs. Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Comparison between GLM-4.5-Air and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) across intelligence, price, speed, context window and more.
For details relating to our methodology, see our Methodology page.
Highlights
Model Comparison
GLM-4.5-Air | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 17* | 20 | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is more intelligent than GLM-4.5-Air |
| Price per 1M Tokens | $0.25 | $1.47 | GLM-4.5-Air is cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) |
| Output Speed | 89 tokens/s | 53 tokens/s | GLM-4.5-Air is faster than Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) |
| Time to First Token | 2.63s | 2.79s | GLM-4.5-Air responds faster than Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) |
| Context Window | 128k tokens~192 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | 256k tokens~384 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) has a larger context window than GLM-4.5-Air |
| Release Date | July 2025 | July 2025 | GLM-4.5-Air has a more recent release date than Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) |
| Parameters | 106B, 12B active at inference time | 235B, 22B active at inference time | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) has more parameters than GLM-4.5-Air |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Both GLM-4.5-Air and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) have reasoning |
| Image Input Support | No | No | Neither GLM-4.5-Air nor Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) have image input support |
| Open Source (Weights) | Both GLM-4.5-Air and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) are open source | ||
| License | |||
| License Supports Commercial Use Without Restrictions | Yes | Yes | Both GLM-4.5-Air and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) have license supports commercial use without restrictions |
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Intelligence Evaluations
Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000
Agentic tool use
Agentic coding & terminal use
Coding
Reasoning & knowledge
Scientific reasoning
Physics reasoning
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Long context reasoning
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Agentic SaaS workflows
Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate
Agentic business operations
Instruction following
Long-horizon agentic tasks
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Visual reasoning
AA-Briefcase
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Omniscience
AA-Omniscience Index
Openness
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Intelligence Index Comparisons
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Token Use
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
Price and Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Context Window
Context Window
Speed
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
Model Size (Open Weights Models Only)
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
Frequently Asked Questions
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is more intelligent. Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) scores 20, compared with GLM-4.5-Air at 17 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
GLM-4.5-Air is faster. GLM-4.5-Air generates 89.3 tokens per second, compared with Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) at 52.8 tokens per second.
GLM-4.5-Air is cheaper. GLM-4.5-Air costs $0.25 per 1M tokens, compared with Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) at $1.47 per 1M tokens (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio).
GLM-4.5-Air has lower latency. GLM-4.5-Air has a time to first token of 2.63s, compared with Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) at 2.79s.
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) has a larger context window. Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) supports 260k tokens, compared with GLM-4.5-Air at 130k tokens.