Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) vs. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Comparison between Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B across intelligence, price, speed, context window and more.
For details relating to our methodology, see our Methodology page.
Highlights
Model Comparison
Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 53 | 58 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is more intelligent than Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) |
| Price per 1M Tokens | $0.58 | $1.18 | Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) is cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
| Context Window | 1000k tokens~1,500 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | 984k tokens~1,475 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) has a larger context window than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
| Release Date | August 2026 | August 2026 | Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) has a more recent release date than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Both Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B have reasoning |
| Image Input Support | Yes | No | Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) has image input support while Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B does not |
| Open Source (Weights) | No | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is open source while Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) is proprietary |
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Intelligence Evaluations
Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000
Agentic tool use
Agentic coding & terminal use
Coding
Reasoning & knowledge
Scientific reasoning
Physics reasoning
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Long context reasoning
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Agentic SaaS workflows
Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate
Agentic business operations
Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents
Instruction following
Long-horizon agentic tasks
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Visual reasoning
AA-Briefcase
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Omniscience
AA-Omniscience Index
Openness Index
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Intelligence Index Comparisons
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Token Use
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Context Window
Context Window
Speed
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
Model Size (Open Weights Models Only)
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
Frequently Asked Questions
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is more intelligent. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B scores 58, compared with Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) at 53 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) is cheaper. Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) costs $0.58 per 1M tokens, compared with Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at $1.18 per 1M tokens (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio).
Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) has a larger context window. Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) supports 1.0M tokens, compared with Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at 980k tokens.