DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) vs. Qwen3.8 Max
Comparison between DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) and Qwen3.8 Max across intelligence, price, speed, context window and more.
For details relating to our methodology, see our Methodology page.
Highlights
Model Comparison
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) | Qwen3.8 Max | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 53 | 58 | Qwen3.8 Max is more intelligent than DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) |
| Price per 1M Tokens | $0.18 | $1.18 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) is cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max |
| Output Speed | 83 tokens/s | 47 tokens/s | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) is faster than Qwen3.8 Max |
| Time to First Token | 1.63s | 2.70s | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) responds faster than Qwen3.8 Max |
| Context Window | 1000k tokens~1,500 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | 1000k tokens~1,500 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | Both DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) and Qwen3.8 Max have the same sized context window |
| Release Date | August 2026 | August 2026 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) has a more recent release date than Qwen3.8 Max |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Both DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) and Qwen3.8 Max have reasoning |
| Image Input Support | No | Yes | Qwen3.8 Max has image input support while DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) does not |
| Open Source (Weights) | Yes | No | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) is open source while Qwen3.8 Max is proprietary |
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Intelligence Evaluations
Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000
Agentic tool use
Agentic coding & terminal use
Coding
Reasoning & knowledge
Scientific reasoning
Physics reasoning
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Long context reasoning
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Agentic SaaS workflows
Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate
Agentic business operations
Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents
Instruction following
Long-horizon agentic tasks
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Visual reasoning
AA-Briefcase
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Omniscience
AA-Omniscience Index
Openness Index
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Intelligence Index Comparisons
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Token Use
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Context Window
Context Window
Speed
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
Model Size (Open Weights Models Only)
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
Frequently Asked Questions
Qwen3.8 Max is more intelligent. Qwen3.8 Max scores 58, compared with DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) at 53 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) is faster. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) generates 83.2 tokens per second, compared with Qwen3.8 Max at 46.9 tokens per second.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) is cheaper. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) costs $0.18 per 1M tokens, compared with Qwen3.8 Max at $1.18 per 1M tokens (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio).
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) has lower latency. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) has a time to first token of 1.63s, compared with Qwen3.8 Max at 2.70s.
Both models have a context window of 1.0M tokens.