DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Comparison between DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro across intelligence, price, speed, context window and more.
For details relating to our methodology, see our Methodology page.
Highlights
Model Comparison
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 44 | 42 | DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) is more intelligent than MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Price per 1M Tokens | $0.18 | $0.18 | Both DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro have the same price |
| Output Speed | 55 tokens/s | 39 tokens/s | DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) is faster than MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Time to First Token | 1.55s | 2.60s | DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) responds faster than MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Context Window | 1000k tokens~1,500 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | 1000k tokens~1,500 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | Both DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro have the same sized context window |
| Release Date | April 2026 | April 2026 | DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) has a more recent release date than MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Parameters | 1600B, 49B active at inference time | 1023B, 42B active at inference time | DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) has more parameters than MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Both DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro have reasoning |
| Image Input Support | No | No | Neither DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) nor MiMo-V2.5-Pro have image input support |
| Open Source (Weights) | Both DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro are open source | ||
| License | |||
| License Supports Commercial Use Without Restrictions | Yes | Yes | Both DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro have license supports commercial use without restrictions |
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Intelligence Evaluations
Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000
Agentic tool use
Agentic coding & terminal use
Coding
Reasoning & knowledge
Scientific reasoning
Physics reasoning
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Long context reasoning
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Agentic SaaS workflows
Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate
Agentic business operations
Instruction following
Long-horizon agentic tasks
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Visual reasoning
AA-Briefcase
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Omniscience
AA-Omniscience Index
Openness Index
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Intelligence Index Comparisons
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Token Use
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Context Window
Context Window
Speed
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
Model Size (Open Weights Models Only)
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
Frequently Asked Questions
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) is more intelligent. DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) scores 44, compared with MiMo-V2.5-Pro at 42 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) is faster. DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) generates 55.0 tokens per second, compared with MiMo-V2.5-Pro at 39.2 tokens per second.
Both models cost $0.18 per 1M tokens (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio).
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) has lower latency. DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) has a time to first token of 1.55s, compared with MiMo-V2.5-Pro at 2.60s.
Both models have a context window of 1.0M tokens.