Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) vs. Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
Comparison between Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) and Qwen3.5 Omni Plus across intelligence, price, speed, context window and more.
For details relating to our methodology, see our Methodology page.
Highlights
Model Comparison
Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 43* | 31* | Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) is more intelligent than Qwen3.5 Omni Plus |
| Price per 1M Tokens | $3.85 | $0.84 | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) |
| Output Speed | 45 tokens/s | 52 tokens/s | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus is faster than Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) |
| Time to First Token | 1.61s | 2.47s | Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) responds faster than Qwen3.5 Omni Plus |
| Context Window | 1000k tokens~1,500 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | 256k tokens~384 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) has a larger context window than Qwen3.5 Omni Plus |
| Release Date | April 2026 | March 2026 | Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) has a more recent release date than Qwen3.5 Omni Plus |
| Reasoning | No | No | Neither Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) nor Qwen3.5 Omni Plus have reasoning |
| Image Input Support | Yes | Yes | Both Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) and Qwen3.5 Omni Plus have image input support |
| Open Source (Weights) | No | No | Both Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) and Qwen3.5 Omni Plus are proprietary |
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Intelligence Evaluations
Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000
Agentic tool use
Agentic coding & terminal use
Coding
Reasoning & knowledge
Scientific reasoning
Physics reasoning
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Long context reasoning
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Agentic SaaS workflows
Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate
Agentic business operations
Instruction following
Long-horizon agentic tasks
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Visual reasoning
AA-Briefcase
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Omniscience
AA-Omniscience Index
Openness Index
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Intelligence Index Comparisons
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Token Use
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Context Window
Context Window
Speed
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
Model Size (Open Weights Models Only)
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
Frequently Asked Questions
Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) is more intelligent. Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) scores 43 (estimated), compared with Qwen3.5 Omni Plus at 31 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus is faster. Qwen3.5 Omni Plus generates 52.4 tokens per second, compared with Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) at 45.2 tokens per second.
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus is cheaper. Qwen3.5 Omni Plus costs $0.84 per 1M tokens, compared with Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) at $3.85 per 1M tokens (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio).
Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) has lower latency. Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) has a time to first token of 1.61s, compared with Qwen3.5 Omni Plus at 2.47s.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) has a larger context window. Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) supports 1.0M tokens, compared with Qwen3.5 Omni Plus at 260k tokens.