Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) vs. Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning)

Name: Intelligence
Creator: Artificial Analysis
License: https://artificialanalysis.ai/docs/legal/Terms-of-Use.pdf

Comparison between Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) and Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) across intelligence, price, speed, context window and more.

For details relating to our methodology, see our Methodology page.

	Anthropic	Google
Intelligence
Intelligence Index	26*	18*
Humanity's Last Exam	19%	15%
CritPt	3%	1%
AA-Omniscience	2	−4
AA-LCR v1.1	67%	55%
Cost
Price per 1M Tokens	$3.85	$0.435
Input Price per 1M Tokens	$5.00	$0.50
Output Price per 1M Tokens	$25.00	$3.00
Cache Hit Price per 1M Tokens	$0.50	$0.05
Token Use
Performance
Output Speed	41 tokens/s	213 tokens/s
Time to First Token	2.08s	0.95s
Time to First Answer Token	2.08s	0.95s
End-to-End Response Time	14.14s	3.29s
Technical specifications
Context Window	1000k tokens~1,500 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font	1000k tokens~1,500 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font
Release Date	February 2026	December 2025
Knowledge Cutoff		January 2025
Reasoning	No	No
Input modality	Supports: text and image	Supports: text, image, speech, and video
Output modality	Supports: text	Supports: text
Open Source (Weights)	No	No

* Estimated

Highlights

Updated

Intelligence

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Cost per Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

No data available

IntelligenceUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 incorporates 10 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, GDPval-AA v2.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1

Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 includes: AA-Briefcase v1.1, GDPval-AA v2.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary

Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)

Indicates whether the model weights are available. Models are labelled as 'Commercial Use Restricted' if commercial use is limited by conditions, and as 'Non-commercial' if the license prohibits commercial use.

Benchmarks

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better

AA-Briefcase v1.1Updated

Agentic knowledge work, (Elo-500)/2000

GDPval-AA v2.1Updated

Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000

AutomationBench-AAUpdated

Agentic SaaS workflows

Terminal-Bench 4.0New

Agentic coding & terminal use

SciCode

Coding

Humanity's Last Exam

Reasoning & knowledge

GDP.pdfNew

Professional document reasoning, All-pass

CritPt

Physics reasoning

AA-Omniscience Accuracy

Knowledge

AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate

1 - hallucination rate

AA-LCR v1.1

Long context reasoning

Harvey LAB-AA

Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate

EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA

Agentic business operations

AA-AnalystAgent

Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents

𝜏³-Banking

Agentic tool use

ITBench-AA

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

MMMU-Pro

Visual reasoning

MLCR-AANew

Medical long context reasoning

While model intelligence generally translates across use cases, specific evaluations may be more relevant for certain use cases.

AA-Omniscience

AA-Omniscience Index

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.

Intelligence Index Comparisons

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task

Most attractive quadrant

Pareto line

AA-Briefcase v1.1

GDPval-AA v2.1

Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Cost

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

The cost to run the evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, calculated using the model's input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices and the number of tokens used across evaluations (excluding repeats).

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Price (USD per M Tokens)

Price per token for cached prompts (previously processed), typically offering a significant discount compared to regular input price, represented as USD per million tokens. The values shown here are the cache hit price; cache write and cache storage are billed separately and vary by provider — see "Cache pricing by provider" for detail.

Context Window

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better

Larger context windows are relevant to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) LLM workflows which typically involve reasoning and information retrieval of large amounts of data.

Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).

Speed

Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average decode time (minutes) per task; excludes TTFT and overhead time · Lower is better

The weighted average time (seconds) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task. This is calculated by dividing output tokens per task by output speed, weighted by the relative weights of each benchmark in the Intelligence Index.

Latency

Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token

Latency: Time To First Answer Token

Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time

Time to first answer token received, in seconds, after API request sent. For reasoning models, this includes the 'thinking' time of the model before providing an answer. For models which do not support streaming, this represents time to receive the completion.

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better

Seconds to receive a 500 token response. Key components:

Input time: Time to receive the first response token
Thinking time (only for reasoning models): Time reasoning models spend outputting tokens to reason prior to providing an answer. Amount of tokens based on the average reasoning tokens across a diverse set of 60 prompts (methodology details).
Answer time: Time to generate 500 output tokens, based on output speed

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) is more intelligent. Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) scores 26 (estimated), compared with Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) at 18 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) is faster. Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) generates 213.2 tokens per second, compared with Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) at 41.5 tokens per second.

Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) is cheaper. Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) costs $0.43 per 1M tokens, compared with Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) at $3.85 per 1M tokens (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio).

Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) has lower latency. Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning) has a time to first token of 0.95s, compared with Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) at 2.08s.

Both models have a context window of 1.0M tokens.

Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) vs. Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning)

Intelligence

Speed

Cost per Task

IntelligenceUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Open Weights

Benchmarks

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence Evaluation Relevance

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

AA-Omniscience

AA-Omniscience Index

AA-Omniscience Index

Intelligence Index Comparisons

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Cache Hit

Context Window

Context Window

Context Window for RAG

Context Window

Speed

Output Speed

Output Speed

Model Performance Representation

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Latency

Latency: Time To First Answer Token

Time to First Answer Token

End-to-End Response Time

End-to-End Response Time

End-to-End Response Time

Model Performance Representation

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is more intelligent, Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) or Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning)?

Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) or Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning)?

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) or Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning)?

Which has lower latency, Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) or Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning)?

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) or Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Non-reasoning)?