This model is deprecated. We only continue performance benchmarking for the default 10k input token workload. Results for other workloads are historical and no longer updated.
Anthropic has launched a newer model, Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning). We suggest considering it instead.
For more information, see comparison of Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning) to other models and API provider benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning).
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) API Provider Benchmarking & Analysis
This analysis is intended to support you in choosing the best API provider of Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) for your use-case.
Fastest
Amazon
Google
Azure
AnthropicOutput speed
Total 4 providers
Lowest Latency
AmazonGoogleAzureAnthropicTime to first token
Total 4 providers
Lowest Price
AmazonAzureGoogleAnthropicBlended price (per 1M tokens)
Total 4 providers
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, high) is available through 4 API providers, each offering different performance characteristics and pricing. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across providers.
- For output speed, the top providers are Amazon (55.5 t/s), Google (43.6 t/s), and Azure (42.6 t/s).
- For latency, Amazon (1.35s), Google (1.46s), and Azure (1.66s) offer the lowest time to first token.
- For pricing, Amazon (2.31), Azure (2.31), and Google (2.31) offer the lowest blended prices per 1M tokens.
- Amazon stands out as the overall leader, ranking first across all three categories: speed, latency, and pricing.
Highlights
Pricing
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Pricing: Blended Price
Pricing: Cache Discount
Output Speed vs. Price
Speed
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
Latency vs. Output Speed
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Time to First Token
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
Key Comparison Metrics & API Features
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) providers
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) is currently available through 4 API providers that we benchmark and track.
All 4 providers of Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) support function calling (tool use).
Amazon leads across all key metrics for Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort), offering the fastest speed, lowest latency, and most competitive pricing.
When choosing a provider for Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort), consider: output speed (for throughput-intensive tasks), latency (for interactive applications requiring quick first responses), pricing (for cost-sensitive workloads), and API features like JSON mode or function calling.
Yes, provider performance can vary over time due to infrastructure changes, load balancing, and updates. We continuously benchmark all providers and display historical performance trends in the "Over Time" charts.
For information about Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)'s intelligence, capabilities, modalities, and how it compares to other models, see the model overview page. View model overview