Muse Spark logo
Meta
•

Proprietary model

•

Released April 2026

Muse Sparkの知能、性能、料金の分析

APIプロバイダーのベンチマーク

モデル概要

知能

43
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
知能は4段階中4です。

速度

該当なし
1秒あたりの出力トークン数
速度は4段階中不明です。

入力料金

$0.00
100万トークンあたりのUSD
入力料金は4段階中1です。

出力料金

$0.00
100万トークンあたりのUSD
出力料金は4段階中1です。

冗長性

57M
Intelligence Indexでの出力トークン数
冗長性は4段階中2です。

Muse Sparkの知能は最先端モデルの一群に入ります。料金は割安です。これは同程度の料金の他のモデルと比較した場合です。 このモデルはテキスト、画像、音声入力に対応し、テキストを出力します。コンテキストウィンドウは262kトークンです。

Muse SparkのArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexスコアは43で、同等のモデルの中では平均を大きく上回る水準です（中央値：15）。Intelligence Indexの評価では57Mトークンを生成し、中央値の63Mと比べて比較的簡潔でした。

Muse Sparkの料金は入力100万トークンあたり$0.00（競争力が高い、中央値：$0.20）、出力100万トークンあたり$0.00（競争力が高い、中央値：$0.60）です。

推論はい

このページでは、このモデルの推論版を表示しています。

非推論版も存在する可能性があります。

入力モダリティ

対応：テキスト、画像、音声

出力モダリティ

対応：テキスト

コンテキストウィンドウ262k
Arial 12ポイントのA4用紙約393ページ分

各指標は同じクラスのモデルと比較します。

  • 非推論モデル → 他の非推論モデルとのみ比較
  • 推論モデル → 推論モデルと非推論モデルの両方と比較
  • オープンウェイトモデル → 同じ規模クラスの他のオープンウェイトモデルとのみ比較：
    • 極小：パラメーター数≤4B
    • 小：パラメーター数4B～40B
    • 中：パラメーター数40B～150B
    • 大：パラメーター数>150B
  • 独自モデル → 入力／出力のブレンド料金を3:1として、同じ料金帯の独自モデルとオープンウェイトモデルを比較：
    • 100万トークンあたり<$0.15
    • 100万トークンあたり$0.15～$1
    • 100万トークンあたり>$1

ハイライト

知能

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

速度

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

タスクあたりの費用

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

知能

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Indicates whether the model weights are available. Models are labelled as 'Commercial Use Restricted' if the weights are available but commercial use is limited (typically requires obtaining a paid license).

ベンチマーク

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better
GDPval-AA v2

Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000

𝜏³-Banking

Agentic tool use

Terminal-Bench v2.1

Agentic coding & terminal use

SciCode

Coding

Humanity's Last Exam

Reasoning & knowledge

GPQA Diamond

Scientific reasoning

CritPt

Physics reasoning

AA-Omniscience Accuracy

Knowledge

AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate

1 - hallucination rate

AA-LCR

Long context reasoning

AA-Briefcase

Agentic knowledge work, Elo

AutomationBench-AA

Agentic SaaS workflows

Harvey LAB-AA

Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate

EnterpriseOps-Gym-AANew

Agentic business operations

IFBench

Instruction following

APEX-Agents-AA

Long-horizon agentic tasks

ITBench-AA

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

MMMU-Pro

Visual reasoning

Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

While model intelligence generally translates across use cases, specific evaluations may be more relevant for certain use cases.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

AA-Briefcase

AA-Briefcase Elo

AA-Briefcase is an agentic knowledge work benchmark developed by Artificial Analysis. AA-Briefcase Elo is a combined metric that aggregates rubric pass rate, analytical quality Elo and presentation Elo · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

AA-Briefcase Elo is a combined metric that aggregates analytical quality Elo, presentation Elo, and rubric pass rate, with rubric performance converted into Elo via synthetic head-to-head matches. Elo and 95% confidence interval bounds are clamped at 0.

AA-Omniscience

AA-Omniscience Index

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.

Intelligence Indexの比較

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

トークン使用量

Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average number of output tokens used to run one task in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

The number of tokens required per Intelligence Index task. This is calculated by multiplying the output tokens per eval by the relative weights of each benchmark in the Intelligence Index, then dividing by task count (excluding repeats).

費用

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

The cost to run the evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, calculated using the model's input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices and the number of tokens used across evaluations (excluding repeats).

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Price (USD per M Tokens)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Price per token for cached prompts (previously processed), typically offering a significant discount compared to regular input price, represented as USD per million tokens. The values shown here are the cache hit price; cache write and cache storage are billed separately and vary by provider — see "Cache pricing by provider" for detail.

コンテキストウィンドウ

Context Window

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Larger context windows are relevant to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) LLM workflows which typically involve reasoning and information retrieval of large amounts of data.

Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).

よくある質問

Muse Sparkに関するよくある質問

Muse Sparkは2026年4月8日にリリースされました。

Muse SparkはMetaが開発しました。

Muse SparkのArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexスコアは43で、同程度の料金帯の他の推論モデルの中では平均を大きく上回る水準です（中央値：15）。

Intelligence Indexの評価で、Muse Sparkは57M出力トークンを生成しました。同程度の料金帯の他の推論モデルと比べて平均より少ない水準です（中央値：63M）。

はい。Muse Sparkは推論モデルです。回答前に拡張思考や思考の連鎖による推論を行い、複雑な問題に取り組みます。

Muse Sparkはテキスト、画像、音声入力に対応しています。

Muse Sparkはテキスト出力に対応しています。

はい。Muse Sparkは画像入力に対応し、画像の分析、説明、画像に関する質問への回答が可能です。

はい。Muse Sparkはマルチモーダルです。テキスト、画像、音声入力を処理し、テキスト出力を生成できます。

Muse Sparkのコンテキストウィンドウは260kトークンです。これは、モデルが1回のリクエストで処理できるテキストと会話履歴の量を決定します。

いいえ。Muse Sparkは独自モデルで、モデルウェイトは一般公開されていません。

Muse Sparkは独自モデルであり、Metaはモデルの規模やパラメーター数を開示していません。

Muse SparkのArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexスコアは43です。この複合ベンチマークでは、推論、知識、数学、コーディングについてモデルを評価します。

現在のAPI提供状況は、プロバイダーページでご確認ください。 プロバイダーを表示

提供状況はプロバイダーページでご確認ください。 プロバイダーを比較