Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning Benchmark Leaderboard
AA-LCR v1.1
スコア
AA-LCR v1.1:スコア
AA-LCR v1.1:スコア vs. タスクあたりのコスト
トークン使用量
AA-LCR v1.1:タスクあたりの出力トークン
コスト
AA-LCR v1.1:タスクあたりのコスト
速度
AA-LCR v1.1:タスクあたりの時間
スコア vs. リリース日
AA-LCR v1.1:スコア vs. リリース日
タスク例
よくある質問
Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning は、AI モデルが長い文書から情報を抽出し、関連付けて推論できるかを測定します。さまざまな分野と形式の文書を使った 100 問で構成されます。
AA-LCR は自由回答問題を合格または不合格で採点します。別の LLM がモデルの回答を公式回答と同等と判定すると得点になります。最終的な AA-LCR スコアは、ベンチマーク全体におけるモデルの平均合格率です。
AA-LCR の公開結果があるモデルの中で、Kimi K3 (Max) が 88.7% で最高スコアです。 モデルを見る
AA-LCR には、企業レポート、業界レポート、政府の意見募集文書、学術論文、法的文書、マーケティング資料、調査レポートなどの長文書セットが含まれます。
大きなコンテキストウィンドウがあっても、長い文書を効果的に推論できるとは限りません。AA-LCR は、長い入力から情報を見つけ、関連付け、統合できるかを評価します。これは財務分析、法務レビュー、研究、企業文書の処理などで重要です。
評価を探す
A composite benchmark aggregating ten challenging evaluations to provide a holistic measure of AI capabilities across mathematics, science, coding, and reasoning.
A composite measure providing an industry standard to communicate model openness for users and developers.
A private evaluation developed by Artificial Analysis for frontier agentic capability in long-horizon knowledge work, testing agents on realistic business workflows that require deliverables such as spreadsheets, presentations, and memos.
GDPval-AA v2.1 is Artificial Analysis' evaluation framework for OpenAI's GDPval dataset. It tests AI models on real-world tasks across 44 occupations and 9 major industries. Models are given shell access and web browsing capabilities in an agentic loop via Stirrup to solve tasks, with Elo ratings derived from blind pairwise comparisons.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of the APEX-Agents benchmark, testing AI agents on long-horizon, cross-application tasks in professional-services environments with realistic application tooling.
Artificial Analysis' data analysis benchmark, testing AI agents on their ability to work with spreadsheets and documents to answer quantitative questions a Business Analyst or Data Analyst would face day-to-day.
A benchmark measuring agentic task completion across simulated SaaS application environments, scoring the share of each task's objectives completed without guardrail violations.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB), testing AI agents on real-world legal work from Harvey's dataset of 120 private tasks spanning 24 legal practice areas. The agent reads case documents in a sandbox and produces legal deliverables (e.g., memos, disclosure schedules, deposition summaries), graded criterion-by-criterion by a single LLM rubric judge.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of Surge AI's GDP.pdf benchmark, testing whether language models can reason over long, real-world professional documents and satisfy detailed task-specific criteria.
Artificial Analysis' independent implementation of ServiceNow's EnterpriseOps-Gym, an agentic benchmark testing whether LLM agents can complete stateful, multi-step enterprise workflows across eight business domains via live tool use, graded on the final state of the underlying databases.
A harder 66-task benchmark of complex terminal work across software, machine learning, science, operations, security, hardware, and media, with recalibrated compute and time allowances and improved instructions, environments, and verifiers.
A 70-task benchmark of research workflows authored and reviewed by domain experts across the life, physical, earth, mathematical, and engineering sciences, each completed in a terminal and checked by its own set of tests.
A challenging benchmark measuring language models' ability to extract, reason about, and synthesize information from long-form documents ranging from 10k to 100k tokens (measured using the cl100k_base tokenizer).
A benchmark measuring factual recall and hallucination across various economically relevant domains.
A scientist-curated coding benchmark featuring 288 test set subproblems from 80 laboratory problems across 16 scientific disciplines.
A frontier-level benchmark with 2,500 expert-vetted questions across mathematics, sciences, and humanities, designed to be the final closed-ended academic evaluation.
A benchmark designed to test LLMs on research-level physics reasoning tasks, featuring 71 composite research challenges.
The most challenging 198 questions from GPQA, where PhD experts achieve 65% accuracy but skilled non-experts only reach 34% despite web access.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of IBM's ITBench benchmark, testing AI agents on Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis from offline incident snapshots. The agent inspects alerts, events, traces, and topology and identifies the contributing-factor entities (deployments, pods, namespaces, network policies, etc.) responsible for the failure.
An enhanced MMMU benchmark that eliminates shortcuts and guessing strategies to more rigorously test multimodal models across 30 academic disciplines.
A benchmark evaluating precise instruction-following generalization on 58 diverse, verifiable out-of-domain constraints that test models' ability to follow specific output requirements.
An open benchmark from Wisedocs measuring how well models reason over long, fragmented medical records, performing the multi-document synthesis claims professionals rely on when reviewing insurance and healthcare cases.
A fintech customer-support benchmark from the 𝜏-Knowledge framework that tests whether agents can navigate a large unstructured knowledge base and execute multi-step tool calls to resolve realistic banking workflows.
A verified refresh of Terminal-Bench 2.0 — 89 curated tasks across software engineering, system administration, data processing, model training, and security, with environment and instruction fixes so scores reflect agent capability rather than environment gaps.
An agentic benchmark evaluating AI capabilities in terminal environments through software engineering, system administration, and data processing tasks.
A dual-control conversational AI benchmark simulating technical support scenarios where both agent and user must coordinate actions to resolve telecom service issues.
An enhanced version of MMLU with 12,000 graduate-level questions across 14 subject areas, featuring ten answer options and deeper reasoning requirements.
A contamination-free coding benchmark that continuously harvests fresh competitive programming problems from LeetCode, AtCoder, and CodeForces, evaluating code generation, self-repair, and execution.
A 500-problem subset from the MATH dataset, featuring competition-level mathematics across six domains including algebra, geometry, and number theory.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination, testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999.
A lightweight, multilingual version of MMLU, designed to evaluate knowledge and reasoning skills across a diverse range of languages and cultural contexts.