ルーブリック
チェックごとの二値合否
モデルはタスクの指示に従い、ソースファイルに隠れた要件を特定し、適切な根拠を使用して正しい結論に達したか?
AA-Briefcaseは、数千の入力ファイルと合計91件のタスクからなる、数週間にわたる4つの知識労働プロジェクトでモデルを評価します。各シナリオでは、データサイエンス、プロダクト管理、企業戦略などの分野における現実的な専門業務を完了する必要があります。各シナリオはエージェントが順番に進める複数週のワークフローで、週ごとに複数のタスクがあります。各タスクの成果物はチェック項目のルーブリックで評価されます。シナリオ内のタスクは週をまたいでファイルとコンテキストを共有しますが、現在、モデルは以前の提出物を引き継がず、各タスクを独立した実行として完了します。
各タスクは3種類のチェックで評価されます。
チェックごとの二値合否
モデルはタスクの指示に従い、ソースファイルに隠れた要件を特定し、適切な根拠を使用して正しい結論に達したか?
ペア比較
別のモデルの提出物と比べ、どちらの成果物がより網羅的で、分析的に厳密かつ十分な根拠に基づいているか?
ペア比較
別のモデルの提出物と比べ、どちらがより専門的に仕上げられているか?
シナリオの構造、提出、採点を示す公開用の5つ目のシナリオをHugging Faceで公開しています。これはデモ専用で、AA-Briefcaseの公式結果には含まれません。
成果物のファイル形式(Excel、PowerPoint、PDF、Word、その他)別のAA-Briefcase成績。
AA-Briefcase実行中に各エージェントが行ったツール呼び出し。ツールカテゴリ別の回数、ターン当たり平均呼び出し回数、ソース探索率を示します。
開発元 | 名前 | Elo | CI | リリース日 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) | 1824 | -12 / +13 | 2026年9月 | |
| 2 | Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) | 1822 | -12 / +12 | 2026年9月 | |
| 3 | Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback) | 1780 | -11 / +11 | 2026年9月 | |
| 4 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback) | 1751 | -13 / +14 | 2026年9月 | |
| 5 | Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort, Default Fallback) | 1705 | -10 / +10 | 2026年9月 | |
| 6 | Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) | 1678 | -10 / +10 | 2026年9月 | |
| 7 | Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) | 1673 | -10 / +11 | 2026年7月 | |
| 8 | Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback) | 1669 | -9 / +10 | 2026年9月 | |
| 9 | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | 1657 | -9 / +9 | 2026年9月 | |
| 10 | Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort) | 1649 | -9 / +10 | 2026年7月 | |
| 11 | Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort, Default Fallback) | 1642 | -10 / +10 | 2026年9月 | |
| 12 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort, Default Fallback) | 1639 | -11 / +11 | 2026年9月 | |
| 13 | Grok 4.7 (High) | 1632 | -10 / +10 | 2026年9月 | |
| 14 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 1621 | -10 / +11 | 2026年9月 | |
| 15 | Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort, Default Fallback) | 1592 | -9 / +10 | 2026年9月 |
A composite benchmark aggregating ten challenging evaluations to provide a holistic measure of AI capabilities across mathematics, science, coding, and reasoning.
A composite measure providing an industry standard to communicate model openness for users and developers.
A private evaluation developed by Artificial Analysis for frontier agentic capability in long-horizon knowledge work, testing agents on realistic business workflows that require deliverables such as spreadsheets, presentations, and memos.
GDPval-AA v2.1 is Artificial Analysis' evaluation framework for OpenAI's GDPval dataset. It tests AI models on real-world tasks across 44 occupations and 9 major industries. Models are given shell access and web browsing capabilities in an agentic loop via Stirrup to solve tasks, with Elo ratings derived from blind pairwise comparisons.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of the APEX-Agents benchmark, testing AI agents on long-horizon, cross-application tasks in professional-services environments with realistic application tooling.
Artificial Analysis' data analysis benchmark, testing AI agents on their ability to work with spreadsheets and documents to answer quantitative questions a Business Analyst or Data Analyst would face day-to-day.
A benchmark measuring agentic task completion across simulated SaaS application environments, scoring the share of each task's objectives completed without guardrail violations.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB), testing AI agents on real-world legal work from Harvey's dataset of 120 private tasks spanning 24 legal practice areas. The agent reads case documents in a sandbox and produces legal deliverables (e.g., memos, disclosure schedules, deposition summaries), graded criterion-by-criterion by a single LLM rubric judge.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of Surge AI's GDP.pdf benchmark, testing whether language models can reason over long, real-world professional documents and satisfy detailed task-specific criteria.
Artificial Analysis' independent implementation of ServiceNow's EnterpriseOps-Gym, an agentic benchmark testing whether LLM agents can complete stateful, multi-step enterprise workflows across eight business domains via live tool use, graded on the final state of the underlying databases.
A harder 66-task benchmark of complex terminal work across software, machine learning, science, operations, security, hardware, and media, with recalibrated compute and time allowances and improved instructions, environments, and verifiers.
A 70-task benchmark of research workflows authored and reviewed by domain experts across the life, physical, earth, mathematical, and engineering sciences, each completed in a terminal and checked by its own set of tests.
A challenging benchmark measuring language models' ability to extract, reason about, and synthesize information from long-form documents ranging from 10k to 100k tokens (measured using the cl100k_base tokenizer).
A benchmark measuring factual recall and hallucination across various economically relevant domains.
A scientist-curated coding benchmark featuring 288 test set subproblems from 80 laboratory problems across 16 scientific disciplines.
A frontier-level benchmark with 2,500 expert-vetted questions across mathematics, sciences, and humanities, designed to be the final closed-ended academic evaluation.
A benchmark designed to test LLMs on research-level physics reasoning tasks, featuring 71 composite research challenges.
The most challenging 198 questions from GPQA, where PhD experts achieve 65% accuracy but skilled non-experts only reach 34% despite web access.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of IBM's ITBench benchmark, testing AI agents on Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis from offline incident snapshots. The agent inspects alerts, events, traces, and topology and identifies the contributing-factor entities (deployments, pods, namespaces, network policies, etc.) responsible for the failure.
An enhanced MMMU benchmark that eliminates shortcuts and guessing strategies to more rigorously test multimodal models across 30 academic disciplines.
A benchmark evaluating precise instruction-following generalization on 58 diverse, verifiable out-of-domain constraints that test models' ability to follow specific output requirements.
An open benchmark from Wisedocs measuring how well models reason over long, fragmented medical records, performing the multi-document synthesis claims professionals rely on when reviewing insurance and healthcare cases.
A fintech customer-support benchmark from the 𝜏-Knowledge framework that tests whether agents can navigate a large unstructured knowledge base and execute multi-step tool calls to resolve realistic banking workflows.
A verified refresh of Terminal-Bench 2.0 — 89 curated tasks across software engineering, system administration, data processing, model training, and security, with environment and instruction fixes so scores reflect agent capability rather than environment gaps.
An agentic benchmark evaluating AI capabilities in terminal environments through software engineering, system administration, and data processing tasks.
A dual-control conversational AI benchmark simulating technical support scenarios where both agent and user must coordinate actions to resolve telecom service issues.
An enhanced version of MMLU with 12,000 graduate-level questions across 14 subject areas, featuring ten answer options and deeper reasoning requirements.
A contamination-free coding benchmark that continuously harvests fresh competitive programming problems from LeetCode, AtCoder, and CodeForces, evaluating code generation, self-repair, and execution.
A 500-problem subset from the MATH dataset, featuring competition-level mathematics across six domains including algebra, geometry, and number theory.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination, testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999.
A lightweight, multilingual version of MMLU, designed to evaluate knowledge and reasoning skills across a diverse range of languages and cultural contexts.