Groq: Models Intelligence, Performance & Price

Groq
Groq

This analysis is intended to support you in choosing the best model provided by Groq for your use-case.

Most Intelligent

Updated

Intelligence Index

Total 6 models

Fastest

#1
gpt-oss-20b (high)gpt-oss-20b (high)
866 t/s
#2
gpt-oss-20b (low)gpt-oss-20b (low)
865 t/s
#3
Llama 3.1 8BLlama 3.1 8B
646 t/s
#4
gpt-oss-120b (high)gpt-oss-120b (high)
471 t/s
#5
gpt-oss-120b (low)gpt-oss-120b (low)
471 t/s

Output speed

Total 6 models

Lowest Price

#1
Llama 3.1 8BLlama 3.1 8B
$0.05
#2
gpt-oss-20b (low)gpt-oss-20b (low)
$0.10
#3
gpt-oss-20b (high)gpt-oss-20b (high)
$0.10
#4
gpt-oss-120b (high)gpt-oss-120b (high)
$0.14
#5
gpt-oss-120b (low)gpt-oss-120b (low)
$0.20

Blended price (per 1M tokens)

Total 6 models

Groq offers 6 models, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across models.

  • For output speed, the fastest models are gpt-oss-20b (high) (866 t/s), gpt-oss-20b (low) (865 t/s), and Llama 3.1 8B (646 t/s). Speed varies significantly across models, with a 84% difference between the fastest and slowest.
  • For latency, Llama 3.1 8B (0.84s), Llama 3.3 70B (0.86s), and gpt-oss-20b (high) (3.05s) offer the lowest time to first answer token.
  • For pricing, Llama 3.1 8B ($0.05), gpt-oss-20b (low) ($0.10), and gpt-oss-20b (high) ($0.10) offer the lowest blended prices per 1M tokens. Prices vary up to 3.7x across models.
  • For context window size, gpt-oss-20b (low) (131k), gpt-oss-20b (high) (131k), and Llama 3.1 8B (131k) support the largest context windows on Groq.
Updated
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
No data available
Output tokens per second · Higher is better
USD per 1M tokens (blended) · Lower is better

Intelligence EvaluationsUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0 incorporates 9 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1
No data available

Evaluations

Evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · AA-PersonalityBench scores are percentile ranks from 1 to 100
See more

Agentic knowledge work, Elo

No data available

1 - hallucination rate

No data available

Agentic SaaS workflows

Agentic scientific research workflows in a terminal

Agentic software engineering in open-source repositories

No data available

Reasoning & knowledge

Professional document reasoning, All-pass

Agentic coding & terminal use

Physics reasoning

No data available

Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents

No data available

Legal agentic work, Hallucination-Gated All-Pass Rate

No data available

Agentic business operations

Agentic real-world work tasks, Elo

Agentic interactive 3D experiences, Elo

No data available

Product and brand videos designed in code, Elo

No data available

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

MLCR-AAUpdated

Medical long context reasoning

Visual reasoning

No data available

Rich, varied, well-crafted language

No data available

Well-structured, scannable, answer-first

No data available

Truthful, acknowledges uncertainty, non-sycophantic

No data available

Use of filler and generic language

No data available

Intelligence Index vs. Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
No data available

Context Window

Context Window

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better

Pricing

Intelligence Index vs. Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
No data available

Performance Summary

Output Speed vs. Price

Output speed: output tokens per second · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Speed

Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Latency

Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token

Latency: Time To First Answer Token

Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time

Cache Behaviour

Cache Hit Rate

Share of cacheable input tokens served from cache · Median of the last four weeks, updated Oct 26, 2026

Cost per Task vs. Cache Hit Rate

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Cache hit rate: median of the last four weeks, updated Oct 26, 2026
Most attractive quadrant
No data available

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

End-to-End Response Time vs. Price

End-to-end response time: end-to-end seconds to output 500 tokens · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant

Further Analysis
OpenAI logo
gpt-oss-20b (low)
131k
Open
--
--
865
0.77
3.66
2.31
OpenAI logo
gpt-oss-20b (high)
131k
Open
--
--
866
0.74
3.63
2.31
Meta logo
Llama 3.1 8B
131k
Open
--
--
646
0.84
1.61
--
Meta logo
Llama 3.3 70B
131k
Open
--
--
327
0.86
2.39
--
OpenAI logo
gpt-oss-120b (low)
131k
Open
--
--
471
0.67
5.98
4.25
OpenAI logo
gpt-oss-120b (high)
131k
Open
--
--
471
0.63
5.94
4.25

Key definitions

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Groq