•

Proprietary model

•

Released December 2025

Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis

Name: Intelligence
Creator: Artificial Analysis
License: https://artificialanalysis.ai/docs/legal/Terms-of-Use.pdf

Try it out API Provider Benchmarks

Speed

N/A

Output tokens per second

Cost

In $0.00Out $0.00

N/A

Cost per Intelligence Index task

Verbosity

N/A

Output tokens from Intelligence Index

Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning is below average in intelligence, but well priced when comparing to other models of similar price. The model supports text input, outputs text, and has a 128k tokens context window.

Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning scores 9 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it below average among comparable models (median: 11).

Pricing for Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning is $0.00 per 1M input tokens (competitively priced, median: $0.19) and $0.00 per 1M output tokens (competitively priced, median: $0.60).

Reasoning	Yes This page shows the reasoning version of this model. A non-reasoning variant may also exist.
Input modality	Supports: text
Output modality	Supports: text
Context window	128k ~192 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font

Metrics are compared against models of the same class:

Non-reasoning models → compared only with other non-reasoning models
Reasoning models → compared across both reasoning and non-reasoning
Open weights models → compared only with other open weights models of the same size class:

Tiny: ≤4B parameters
Small: 4B–40B parameters
Medium: 40B–150B parameters
Large: >150B parameters

Proprietary models → compared across proprietary and open weights models of the same price range, using a blended 3:1 input/output price ratio:

<$0.15 per 1M tokens
$0.15–$1 per 1M tokens
>$1 per 1M tokens

Highlights

Updated

Intelligence

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Cost per Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

IntelligenceUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3 incorporates 10 evaluations: AA-Briefcase, GDPval-AA v2, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench v4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1

Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3 includes: AA-Briefcase, GDPval-AA v2, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench v4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary

Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)

Indicates whether the model weights are available. Models are labelled as 'Commercial Use Restricted' if commercial use is limited by conditions, and as 'Non-commercial' if the license prohibits commercial use.

Benchmarks

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better

AA-Briefcase

Agentic knowledge work, (Elo-500)/2000

GDPval-AA v2

Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000

AutomationBench-AAUpdated

Agentic SaaS workflows

Terminal-Bench v4.0New

Agentic coding & terminal use

SciCode

Coding

Humanity's Last Exam

Reasoning & knowledge

GDP.pdfNew

Professional document reasoning, All-pass

CritPt

Physics reasoning

AA-Omniscience Accuracy

Knowledge

AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate

1 - hallucination rate

AA-LCR v1.1

Long context reasoning

Harvey LAB-AA

Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate

EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA

Agentic business operations

AA-AnalystAgent

Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents

IFBench

Instruction following

𝜏³-Banking

Agentic tool use

APEX-Agents-AA

Long-horizon agentic tasks

ITBench-AA

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

MMMU-Pro

Visual reasoning

While model intelligence generally translates across use cases, specific evaluations may be more relevant for certain use cases.

AA-Omniscience

AA-Omniscience Index

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.

Intelligence Index Comparisons

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task

Most attractive quadrant

Pareto line

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Cost

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

The cost to run the evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, calculated using the model's input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices and the number of tokens used across evaluations (excluding repeats).

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Price (USD per M Tokens)

Price per token for cached prompts (previously processed), typically offering a significant discount compared to regular input price, represented as USD per million tokens. The values shown here are the cache hit price; cache write and cache storage are billed separately and vary by provider — see "Cache pricing by provider" for detail.

Context Window

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better

Larger context windows are relevant to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) LLM workflows which typically involve reasoning and information retrieval of large amounts of data.

Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning

Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning was released on December 4, 2025.

Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning was created by Motif Technologies.

Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning scores 9 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it below average among other reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 11).

Yes, Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning is a reasoning model. It uses extended thinking or chain-of-thought reasoning to work through complex problems before providing an answer.

Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning supports text input.

Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning supports text output.

No, Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning does not support image input. It can only process text.

No, Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning is not multimodal. It only supports text input.

Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning has a context window of 130k tokens. This determines how much text and conversation history the model can process in a single request.

No, Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning is proprietary. The model weights are not publicly available.

Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning has 12.7 billion parameters.

Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning achieves a score of 9 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. This composite benchmark evaluates models across reasoning, knowledge, mathematics, and coding.

Check the providers page for current API availability. View providers

Visit the providers page to see availability. Compare providers

Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis

Model summary

IntelligenceUpdated

Speed

Cost

Verbosity

Comparison Summary

Technical specifications

645 models in this class

Intelligence

Speed

Cost per Task

IntelligenceUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Open Weights

Benchmarks

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence Evaluation Relevance

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

AA-Omniscience

AA-Omniscience Index

AA-Omniscience Index

Intelligence Index Comparisons

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Cache Hit

Context Window

Context Window

Context Window for RAG

Context Window

Frequently Asked Questions

When was Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning released?

Who created Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning?

How intelligent is Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning?

Is Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning a reasoning model?

What input modalities does Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning support?

What output modalities does Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning support?

Can Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning process images?

Is Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning multimodal?

What is the context window of Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning?

Is Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning open source?

How many parameters does Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning have?

How does Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning perform on benchmarks?

Is Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning available via API?

Where can I use Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning?