•

Open weights model

•

Released October 2026

Ling 3.1 Flash API Provider Benchmarking & Analysis

Model Comparison

This analysis is intended to support you in choosing the best API provider of Ling 3.1 Flash for your use-case.

Lowest Time per Task

Time per Intelligence Index task (minutes)

Total 2 providers

Lowest Cost per Task

Cost per Intelligence Index task

Total 2 providers

Ling 3.1 Flash is available through 2 API providers, each offering different performance characteristics and pricing. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across providers.

    Inference time (minutes) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better
    No data available
    Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better
    No data available

    Pricing

    Cost per Intelligence Index Task: Ling 3.1 Flash

    Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better
    No data available

    Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output: Ling 3.1 Flash

    Price (USD per M Tokens) · Lower is better

    Output Speed vs. Cost per Task: Ling 3.1 Flash

    Output speed: output tokens divided by total request time, including time to first token · Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task
    Most attractive quadrant
    No data available

    Speed

    Average of the single-request and multi-turn agentic workloads measured

    Output Speed: Ling 3.1 Flash

    Output tokens divided by total request time · Includes time to first token · Average of the single-request and multi-turn agentic workloads measured · Higher is better

    Latency

    Average of the single-request and multi-turn agentic workloads measured

    Time to First Answer Token: Ling 3.1 Flash

    Seconds until the first answer token after any reasoning · Average of the single-request and multi-turn agentic workloads measured · Lower is better

    Reliability

    Share of requests the endpoint failed, across all the single-request and multi-turn agentic workloads measured

    Endpoint Error Rate: Ling 3.1 Flash

    Share of requests the endpoint failed with an error, a rate limit or a timeout · Across all the single-request and multi-turn agentic workloads measured · Lower is better

    Caching

    Cache Hit Rate: Ling 3.1 Flash

    Median across multi-turn agentic session runs in the last four weeks, updated Oct 26, 2026 · Higher is better

    Cost per Task vs. Cache Hit Rate: Ling 3.1 Flash

    Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Cache hit rate: median of the last four weeks, updated Oct 26, 2026
    Most attractive quadrant
    No data available

    Key Comparison Metrics & API Features

    DeepInfra logoDeepInfra
    --
    --
    73.84
    5.4%
    262k
    Open
    InclusionAI logoInclusionAI
    --
    --
    47.94
    0.7%
    1M
    Open

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about Ling 3.1 Flash providers