This model is deprecated. We only continue performance benchmarking for the default 10k input token workload. Results for other workloads are historical and no longer updated.

Z AI has launched a newer release, GLM-5. We suggest considering it instead.

•
GLM-4.7
•

Open weights model

•

Released December 2025

GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) API Provider Benchmarking & Analysis

Model Comparison

This analysis is intended to support you in choosing the best API provider of GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) for your use-case.

Fastest

#1
BasetenBaseten
215.1 t/s
#2
GoogleGoogle
183.3 t/s
#3
AmazonAmazon
71.3 t/s
#4
NovitaNovita
38.2 t/s
#5
DeepInfra (FP4)DeepInfra (FP4)
16.0 t/s

Output speed

Total 6 providers

Lowest Latency

#1
BasetenBaseten
9.84 s
#2
GoogleGoogle
11.61 s
#3
AmazonAmazon
29.48 s
#4
NovitaNovita
56.98 s
#5
DeepInfra (FP4)DeepInfra (FP4)
126.65 s

Time to first answer token

Total 6 providers

Lowest Price

#1
DeepInfra (FP4)DeepInfra (FP4)
$0.31
#2
NovitaNovita
$0.42
#3
BasetenBaseten
$0.42
#4
Together AITogether AI
$0.60
#5
AmazonAmazon
$0.76

Blended price (per 1M tokens)

Total 6 providers

GLM-4.7 is available through 6 API providers, each offering different performance characteristics and pricing. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across providers.

  • For output speed, the top providers are Baseten (215.1 t/s), Google (183.3 t/s), and Amazon (71.3 t/s). Speed varies significantly across providers, with a 1247% difference between the fastest and slowest.
  • For latency, Baseten (9.84s), Google (11.61s), and Amazon (29.48s) offer the lowest time to first answer token.
  • For pricing, DeepInfra (FP4) (0.31), Novita (0.42), and Baseten (0.42) offer the lowest blended prices per 1M tokens. Prices vary up to 2.4x across providers.
  • Baseten offers the best performance with both the highest speed and lowest latency. For cost optimization, DeepInfra (FP4) provides the most competitive pricing.
Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Seconds to first answer token received · Lower is better
USD per 1M tokens (blended) · Lower is better

Pricing

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Price (USD per M Tokens) · Lower is better · 10,000 input tokens

Pricing: Blended Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended) · Lower is better

Pricing: Cache Discount

1 - (cache hit price / input price) · Higher is better

Output Speed vs. Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · Output speed: output tokens per second · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Speed

Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)

Output Speed: GLM-4.7 (Reasoning)

Output speed: output tokens per second · 10,000 input tokens

Latency vs. Output Speed

Latency: seconds to first token received · Output speed: output tokens per second · 10,000 input tokens
Most attractive quadrant

Latency

Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token

Time to First Answer Token

Seconds to first token received · Lower is better · 10,000 input tokens

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better · 10,000 input tokens

Key Comparison Metrics & API Features

Novita logoNovita
205k
Open
--
35
5.11
76.57
57.17
Baseten logoBaseten
200k
Open
--
211
0.60
12.44
9.47
DeepInfra logoDeepInfra
203k
Open
--
20
1.33
124.71
98.70
Amazon Bedrock logoAmazon Bedrock
200k
Open
--
57
1.60
45.43
35.07
Together AI logoTogether AI
203k
Open
--
--
--
--
--
Google logoGoogle
200k
Open
--
177
0.68
14.79
11.29

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) providers