Z AI has launched a newer model, GLM-5, we suggest considering this model instead.
For more information, see Comparison of GLM-5 to other models and API provider benchmarks for GLM-5.
GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) API Provider Benchmarking & Analysis
Analysis of API providers for GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) across performance metrics including latency (time to first token), output speed (output tokens per second), price and others. API providers benchmarked include Google, Baseten, Novita, SiliconFlow, DeepInfra (FP4), Parasail (FP8), Cerebras, Together.ai, Nebius (FP8), Clarifai, Amazon Bedrock.
Fastest
Output speed
Total 11 providers
Lowest Latency
Time to first token
Total 11 providers
Lowest Price
Blended price (per 1M tokens)
Total 11 providers
GLM-4.7 is available through 11 API providers, each offering different performance characteristics and pricing. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across providers.
- For output speed, the top providers are Cerebras (1,498.6 t/s), Baseten (268.9 t/s), Google (211.8 t/s). Speed varies significantly across providers, with a 1478% difference between the fastest and slowest.
- For latency, Baseten (0.41s), Cerebras (0.51s), Google (0.60s) offer the lowest time to first token.
- For pricing, DeepInfra (FP4) (0.74), Nebius (FP8) (0.80), Together.ai (0.84) offer the lowest blended prices per 1M tokens.
Update: Default performance benchmarking workload has updated to 10k input tokens to better reflect production use cases. You can still select different workloads above!
Pricing
Pricing: Input and Output Prices: GLM-4.7 Providers
Speed vs. Price: GLM-4.7 Providers
Speed
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed: GLM-4.7 Providers
Latency vs. Output Speed: GLM-4.7 Providers
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Time to First Answer Token: GLM-4.7 Providers
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 Tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time: GLM-4.7 Providers
API Features
Function (Tool) Calling & JSON Mode: GLM-4.7 Providers
Context Window: GLM-4.7 Providers
Summary Table of Key Comparison Metrics
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) providers
GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) is available through 11 API providers: Google, Baseten, Novita, SiliconFlow, DeepInfra (FP4), Parasail (FP8), Cerebras, Together.ai, Nebius (FP8), Clarifai, and Amazon. Each provider offers different performance characteristics and pricing.
GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) is currently available through 11 API providers that we benchmark and track.
The most affordable providers for GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) by blended price are DeepInfra (FP4) ($0.74 per 1M tokens), Nebius (FP8) ($0.80 per 1M tokens), and Together.ai ($0.84 per 1M tokens). Blended price uses a 3:1 input to output token ratio.
The providers with the lowest input token pricing for GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) are DeepInfra (FP4) ($0.40 per 1M input tokens), Nebius (FP8) ($0.40 per 1M input tokens), and Parasail (FP8) ($0.45 per 1M input tokens).
The providers with the lowest output token pricing for GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) are DeepInfra (FP4) ($1.75 per 1M output tokens), SiliconFlow ($2.00 per 1M output tokens), and Together.ai ($2.00 per 1M output tokens).
Prices for GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) vary up to 3.2x across providers. The most affordable is DeepInfra (FP4) at $0.74 per 1M tokens, while Cerebras charges $2.38 per 1M tokens.
Output speed for GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) varies significantly across providers. Cerebras is the fastest at 1,498.6 t/s, which is 37.3x faster than Parasail (FP8) at 40.1 t/s.
7 of 11 providers support JSON mode for GLM-4.7 (Reasoning): Google, Novita, DeepInfra (FP4), Parasail (FP8), Together.ai, Nebius (FP8), and Clarifai.
All 11 providers of GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) support function calling (tool use).
The best provider for GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) depends on your priorities: Cerebras offers the highest output speed, Baseten has the lowest latency, and DeepInfra (FP4) provides the most competitive pricing.
When choosing a provider for GLM-4.7 (Reasoning), consider: output speed (for throughput-intensive tasks), latency (for interactive applications requiring quick first responses), pricing (for cost-sensitive workloads), and API features like JSON mode or function calling.
Yes, provider performance can vary over time due to infrastructure changes, load balancing, and updates. We continuously benchmark all providers and display historical performance trends in the "Over Time" charts.
For information about GLM-4.7 (Reasoning)'s intelligence, capabilities, modalities, and how it compares to other models, see the model overview page. View model overview
DeepInfra (FP4)
Cerebras