Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) vs. Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)
Comparison between Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) and Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) across intelligence, price, speed, context window and more.
For details relating to our methodology, see our Methodology page.
Highlights
Model Comparison
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) | Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 29* | 41* | Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) is more intelligent than Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) |
| Price per 1M Tokens | $0.42 | $3.85 | Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) |
| Output Speed | 146 tokens/s | 47 tokens/s | Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) is faster than Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) |
| Time to First Token | 2.08s | 14.67s | Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) responds faster than Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) |
| Context Window | 262k tokens~393 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | 200k tokens~300 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) has a larger context window than Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) |
| Release Date | February 2026 | November 2025 | Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) has a more recent release date than Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Both Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) and Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) have reasoning |
| Image Input Support | Yes | Yes | Both Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) and Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) have image input support |
| Open Source (Weights) | No | Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) is open source while Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) is proprietary |
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Intelligence Evaluations
Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000
Agentic tool use
Agentic coding & terminal use
Coding
Reasoning & knowledge
Scientific reasoning
Physics reasoning
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Long context reasoning
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Agentic SaaS workflows
Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate
Agentic business operations
Instruction following
Long-horizon agentic tasks
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Visual reasoning
AA-Briefcase
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Omniscience
AA-Omniscience Index
Openness Index
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Intelligence Index Comparisons
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Token Use
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Context Window
Context Window
Speed
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
Model Size (Open Weights Models Only)
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
Frequently Asked Questions
Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) is more intelligent. Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) scores 41 (estimated), compared with Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) at 29 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) is faster. Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) generates 145.9 tokens per second, compared with Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) at 46.9 tokens per second.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) is cheaper. Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) costs $0.42 per 1M tokens, compared with Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) at $3.85 per 1M tokens (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio).
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) has lower latency. Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) has a time to first token of 2.08s, compared with Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) at 14.67s.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) has a larger context window. Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) supports 260k tokens, compared with Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) at 200k tokens.